- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 23,086
- Reaction score
- 2,375
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
For a person who supposedly has two degrees, your knowledge of history and grammar are abysmal.
I provided links to documentation showing that Simon Greenleaf was an active Christian well before he stood in front of any classroom of Harvard students.
SECOND: Mr Greenleaf was the ROYALL Professor of Law, the title of the position paying honor to the man who had provided funding for the job - The Legacy of Isaac Royall, Jr
THIRD: Lord Lyndhurst and Thomas Arnold were "royal" attorneys, they were British.
FOURTH: Thomas Arnold, though well educated in the field of history, didn't much care for the work of the scientists of his day. He wrote that ". . . rather than have physical science the principal thing in my son's mind, I would gladly have him think that the sun went round the earth, and that the stars were so many spangles set in the bright blue firmament. Surely the one thing needful for a Christian and an Englishman to study is Christian and moral and political philosophy." Arnold of Rugby: His School Life and Contributions to Education (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1897), p. xvii.
He also didn't see Catholics, Quakers or Unitarians as Christian
FIFTH: Mr Arnold was the Regius Professor of History at OXFORD University - NOT Oxnard.
My dad used to call that kind of flippant one up-man-ship being a jailhouse lawyer.
The big thing is, for all your so-called 'smarts and knowledge,' those learned men were all heads and heels above you concerning the historical Jesus. It still amazes me to this day how a guy like you - or any person - can be presented with the reams and volumes of evidences for the historical Jesus, etc., etc., and still be absolutely clueless about it all. And then be a believer in socialism to boot. I still get a kick out of that, lol.