- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
- Messages
- 10,257
- Reaction score
- 4,163
- Location
- Washington, D.C.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
$2.5 billion, $5 Billion, $15 billion or $25 billion...The press, because Pence and others uttered such notions, have reported that the amount of money appropriated for a wall be a point of negotiation in the talks to abate Trump's shutdown of portions of the federal government. That the sum of money be a negotiation point is among the most dimwitted propositions I've heard in recent weeks. The Dems' stance on the idea of building a wall on the southern border is "no new wall/fencing on the southern border," not "X dollars for new southern border walling/fencing is too much money."
Son: "Dad, can I have $2000 to go to NY for the weekend?"
Dad: "I'm not permitting you to go to NY for the weekend, so no."
Son: "Well, how about $1000?"
Dad: "What part of 'you're not going to NY for the weekend' confuses you? It's not about the money. It's that you're not going to NY for the weekend.
Given the nature of Dems' position, all sums of money are "too much," and it's thus absurd to even haggle over the amount of money that be or be not appropriated to that end.
i don't understand. What's wrong with new york?
$2.5 billion, $5 Billion, $15 billion or $25 billion...The press, because Pence and others uttered such notions, have reported that the amount of money appropriated for a wall be a point of negotiation in the talks to abate Trump's shutdown of portions of the federal government. That the sum of money be a negotiation point is among the most dimwitted propositions I've heard in recent weeks. The Dems' stance on the idea of building a wall on the southern border is "no new wall/fencing on the southern border," not "X dollars for new southern border walling/fencing is too much money."
Son: "Dad, can I have $2000 to go to NY for the weekend?"
Dad: "I'm not permitting you to go to NY for the weekend, so no."
Son: "Well, how about $1000?"
Dad: "What part of 'you're not going to NY for the weekend' confuses you? It's not about the money. It's that you're not going to NY for the weekend.
Given the nature of Dems' position, all sums of money are "too much," and it's thus absurd to even haggle over the amount of money that be or be not appropriated to that end.
Representative Ted Lieu put it succinctly:
"Here's the problem you created. If Dems cave to your ransom-note tactics of using a shutdown, what's to keep you from doing this again? Nothing. That's why Dems won't budge."
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1080144741533007872
Similarly, Trump lied about where the funding would come from during the campaign, only to turn around and foist the burden onto the American tax payer. If Democrats give in, they will not only be rewarding his blackmail, but the continued motivation to lie regarding important and costly issues.
The only reason Trump is going to Congress for the money is because Congress won't do what's necessary to make Mexico pay.
But, of course, that's how Congress wants it. Congress doesn't want a wall because their big money donors don't want a wall. Doesn't matter what the people want, doesn't matter what's good for the country. The donors are the only ones who matter.
Son: But Dad, you gave my brother loads of money to go to NY just a few years ago.
Dad: That was different son, because your brother is a stellar Grade A student who earned it whereas you are a miserable failure who flunked out of school, lies all the time, is regularly in and out of prison and disgraces the family daily.
Son: But Dad, you gave my brother loads of money to go to NY just a few years ago.
Dad: That was different son, because he is not like you and then was not like now - it's politics son.
The only reason Trump is going to Congress for the money is because Congress won't do what's necessary to make Mexico pay.
But, of course, that's how Congress wants it. Congress doesn't want a wall because their big money donors don't want a wall. Doesn't matter what the people want, doesn't matter what's good for the country. The donors are the only ones who matter.
The only reason Trump is going to Congress for the money is because Congress won't do what's necessary to make Mexico pay.
But, of course, that's how Congress wants it. Congress doesn't want a wall because their big money donors don't want a wall. Doesn't matter what the people want, doesn't matter what's good for the country. The donors are the only ones who matter.
The only reason Trump is going to Congress for the money is because Congress won't do what's necessary to make Mexico pay.
But, of course, that's how Congress wants it. Congress doesn't want a wall because their big money donors don't want a wall. Doesn't matter what the people want, doesn't matter what's good for the country. The donors are the only ones who matter.
How about enlightening at least me; what are the Congressional moves to “make Mexico pay?”
$2.5 billion, $5 Billion, $15 billion or $25 billion...The press, because Pence and others uttered such notions, have reported that the amount of money appropriated for a wall be a point of negotiation in the talks to abate Trump's shutdown of portions of the federal government. That the sum of money be a negotiation point is among the most dimwitted propositions I've heard in recent weeks. The Dems' stance on the idea of building a wall on the southern border is "no new wall/fencing on the southern border," not "X dollars for new southern border walling/fencing is too much money."
Son: "Dad, can I have $2000 to go to NY for the weekend?"
Dad: "I'm not permitting you to go to NY for the weekend, so no."
Son: "Well, how about $1000?"
Dad: "What part of 'you're not going to NY for the weekend' confuses you? It's not about the money. It's that you're not going to NY for the weekend.
Given the nature of Dems' position, all sums of money are "too much," and it's thus absurd to even haggle over the amount of money that be or be not appropriated to that end.
Some comments are so untethered to anything in the real world there's no reason to engage them seriously.
Some comments are so untethered to anything in the real world that there's no reason to engage them seriously.
Keeping the government closed over a dispute about a relatively small amount of money is an option.
Keeping the government closed over a dispute about a relatively small amount of money is an option.
It is also stupidly destructive and immoral, if we are going to risk that kind of damage then it needs to be over big important things.
The only reason Trump is going to Congress for the money is because Congress won't do what's necessary to make Mexico pay.
But, of course, that's how Congress wants it. Congress doesn't want a wall because their big money donors don't want a wall. Doesn't matter what the people want, doesn't matter what's good for the country. The donors are the only ones who matter.
This is the one time when someone will tell you that: “it’s not about the money,” it will be the unvarnished truth!
Trump has decided that keeping his word as he was asking for votes is important, and the D's have decided that humiliating the President is important.
One is better than the other.
Trump has decided that keeping his word as he was asking for votes is important, and the D's have decided that humiliating the President is important.
One is better than the other.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?