• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

18 U.S. Code § 2101 - Riots

ElChupacabra said:
Ah, are you one of those who thinks unless someone's speech says "go commit acts of violence" their rhetoric can't incite violence?
Click to expand...
im someone who thinks that nobody said "go commit acts of violence"
 
he said we will march down Pennsylvania ave, not the capital
 
The Hairy Fiddler said:
Listen up dude. Rudy made it clear Wednesday morning. 3 separate links. That's not inciting violence? Do you have any English comprehension skills?
Click to expand...
listen up dude. none of those posts proved there was violence
 
uptower said:
Dead people didn't vote. This has been disproved. Come with facts or not at all.
Click to expand...
dead people did vote and democrtat DA's refused to do anything
 
Mobs are 'orchestrated to pressure congress' all the time. How do you not know this?
 
Fletch said:
Mobs are 'orchestrated to pressure congress' all the time. How do you not know this?
Click to expand...

You are being intellectually dishonest. You know that is not what William Barr meant.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
You are being intellectually dishonest. You know that is not what William Barr meant.
Click to expand...
I quoted your post. If thats not what Barr meant, why did you put those words in his mouth? Were you just being intellectually dishonest?
 
Fletch said:
I quoted your post. If thats not what Barr meant, why did you put those words in his mouth? Were you just being intellectually dishonest?
Click to expand...

You are again being intellectually dishonest. Anyone can see that his rebuke of Trump, he meant that Trump fomenting sedition and insurrection. Otherwise, why would he publically rebuke Trump as having "betrayed his office and supporters"? His former AG that has backed through and through would not all of a sudden rebuke Trump has having betrayed his office if he meant that Trump did something that politicians routinely do.

So if you want to keep up with the intellectual dishonesty, then go ahead, and I will just put you on ignore.
 
Fletch said:
Keep proving you dont know wtf you are talking about.
Click to expand...
It is intuitively obvious to even the most causal of observers that the phrase "we are a nation of laws" is pure unadulterated bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.