• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

1 Year ago, Biden called for banning magazines that can hold "multiple bullets"

mike2810 said:
TD. I have ready stated I don't care. If you want a high capacity mag, then by all means get some.
You seem to feel the need to have them. I don't. For me the standard mag is fine.
Click to expand...

you do know that many gun banners call standard mags "high capacity"
 
noonereal said:
It's an iron phallus for the small of mind.
Click to expand...

You really should take your own advice from another section on this website and stop the antagonizing posts if you are interested in any meaningful debate.
 
Chillfolks said:
You really should take your own advice from another section on this website and stop the antagonizing posts if you are interested in any meaningful debate.
Click to expand...

Sorry you take offense, honestly.

It is what it is however.
 
noonereal said:
Sorry you take offense, honestly.

It is what it is however.
Click to expand...

I am not offened by your posts at all I recognize them for the steaming pile of **** they are. I just find it comical that you asl others not to post antagonizing posts when on this forum that is all you have to offer.
 
Aunt Antifa said:
So that’s you admitting everything I wrote was 100% correct.

Thank you I like this game.
Click to expand...

:lamo

No...that’s you recognizing you **** the bed and figured your only recourse is to shriek TTTRRRUUUUUUMMMMPPPP!!!! And TRULY seal the deal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
zsu2357 said:
I guess it's what you call being snuck up on and shot in the ass?:shock:
Click to expand...

Well...it did make one of the most inane and pathetic segues away from an arguement I’ve seen in a while.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
VanceMack said:
:lamo

No...that’s you recognizing you **** the bed and figured your only recourse is to shriek TTTRRRUUUUUUMMMMPPPP!!!! And TRULY seal the deal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So in other words you admit I was correct and you apologize.

Thank you! :)
 
Aunt Antifa said:
So in other words you admit I was correct and you apologize.

Thank you! :)
Click to expand...
:lamo

I'm sure you will try to convince yourself of that. Hell...I reckon you actually have that self delusion thing down pat and may actually believe it, even if you know just how badly you clowned yourself.
 
swing_voter said:
*rollseyes*

He means large magazines, like 30 and over.
Click to expand...

People like to say what he means as if they know. I don't think he even thinks about it. But if you don't want to be misunderstood you should not miscommunicate.

Banning magazines over 30 rounds were just means people have 30 round magazines why not been a magazine look more than three rounds? Why you just randomly pick some arbitrary number and say that's too much
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom