• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

“It Will Not End Well For You”

To me this is an attempt to take pressure and spotlight off of Vance. Trump doesn't like when anyone but Trump gets publicity. Good or bad. Sounds to me like an adult entered the room and said "enough" with the odd-ball stuff. I wonder if Trump will announce he's going to be nice again now?

But all we/Dems have to do is keep showing how he was associated with engineering it. (But be very careful tho! ;))

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
To me this is an attempt to take pressure and spotlight off of Vance. Trump doesn't like when anyone but Trump gets publicity. Good or bad. Sounds to me like an adult entered the room and said "enough" with the odd-ball stuff. I wonder if Trump will announce he's going to be nice again now?

Meh. I wouldn’t run around bragging about it, either.
My point was that the entire first paragraph of the Trump campaign's official statement is a complete lie. I suspect they were thrilled when it was under the radar.

“President Trump’s campaign has been very clear for over a year that Project 2025 had nothing to do with the campaign, did not speak for the campaign, and should not be associated with the campaign or the President in any way,”
 
Well, that's just another one of trump's big fat lies; it's a fact that all 140 people involved in creating project 2025 are trump accolades.

This is nothing more than trump trying to pull his ass out of the fire, now that P2025 has scared the shit out of everyone.....

Acolytes.
 
He's far more familiar with it than he wants ANYONE to know. He never counted on it being so unpopular, and as usual, he will throw P2025 under the bus to not loose votes. Why? Because his best event is lying to the American people.
I know Bongino has been crowing about 2025 for years and he's BFF with Trump, just ask him!
 
The CEO of Project 2025 resigned this afternoon.

Poor guy, must have been painful under those bus tracks. Did anyone officially welcome him yet to the, thrown right under the bus to protect dear leader, club?
 
🤭🤭

View attachment 67523246


Now you need to believe that my campaign had nothing to do with Project 2025, despite the fact that my VP pick has direct ties to the movement. If you don’t stop telling the truth about it, it will not end well for you!”

Add as many exclamation points as you need.

Wanna be mafioso strikes again.
What fear and desperation. Project 2025 IS TRUMP.
 
One of the real oddities (weirdities 😇 ) of the Trump campaign is that it continues to double down on extreme positions that are only attractive to the voters who have already committed to Trump. P2025, and Vance to a lessor extent, are more examples of that. To win in November, Trump needs to start appealing to the independents, centrists, and more moderate Republicans. P2025 is scaring those people away rather than attracting them. It's time for Trump to start hiding the more extreme parts of his agenda before the uncommitted voting public work out what he truly has planned.

My feeling is that the extreme right have got so giddy with excitement over the thought of getting into power that they are forgetting to keep their awful agenda hidden.
 
That's kind of a weird statement.
Not really considering the leader of the project just got fired.


Dans is leaving “after pressure from Trump campaign leadership” and an “ongoing power rift over staffing control” for a second Trump administration, Roger Sollenberger, a reporter for the Daily Beast, wrote on Twitter/X.

Don't let any of this fool you into believing the project doesn't mean anything. It very much does. The leg work has been done.
 
If Trump were to drop Vance is would be an outrage, a 'Bloodless Coup'! We demand to run against Vance, well....as long as we get to run against Trump...
They can't get rid of Vance, that would be an abortion.
 
🤭🤭

View attachment 67523246


Now you need to believe that my campaign had nothing to do with Project 2025, despite the fact that my VP pick has direct ties to the movement. If you don’t stop telling the truth about it, it will not end well for you!”

Add as many exclamation points as you need.

Wanna be mafioso strikes again.

He was so very clear when he said he wasn't familiar with it and disagreed with some of it.
 
Are we supposed to just ignore the fact that multiple former Trump administration officials from his first term were involved in writing project 2025?

I mean, sure, it's possible he knows nothing specific about it, and probably hasn't read it, but for damn sure some of those people will be considered for positions if he gets another term, and I'd be very surprised if it wasn't at least discussed in broad terms with him.

Basically…,

Yes

WW
 
🤭🤭

View attachment 67523246


Now you need to believe that my campaign had nothing to do with Project 2025, despite the fact that my VP pick has direct ties to the movement. If you don’t stop telling the truth about it, it will not end well for you!”

Add as many exclamation points as you need.

Wanna be mafioso strikes again.
Meanwhile, the authors of Project 2025 are

Paul Dans: Former chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management during the Trump administration, serves as the director of Project 2025.
Spencer Chretien: Former special assistant to President Trump and associate director of Presidential Personnel, serves as the associate director of the project.
Steven Groves: Former deputy press secretary and assistant special counsel in the Trump administration, co-editor of Project 2025.
Russ Vought: Former director of the Office of Management and Budget under Trump, contributed to the policy guide.
Roger Severino: Former director of the Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services under Trump, involved in the project.
Christopher Miller: Former acting Defense Secretary under Trump, contributed to the policy guide.
Stephen Moore: Economic advisor to Trump and co-author of the Project 2025 framework.
William Perry Pendley: Former acting director of the Bureau of Land Management under Trump, contributed to the policy guide.
Bernard McNamee: Former member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under Trump, authored sections on energy policy.

All of these people have served in the Trump administration and are directly involved in the current Trump campaign and will serve in his administration should he get elected. This basically means two things...

  1. Trump is fully aware of Project 2025 but deliberately avoids acknowledging it, recognizing its unpopular nature. This suggests a lack of transparency and willingness to mislead voters about his true intentions if re-elected.
  2. Trump is uninformed about the project, indicating that his advisors are shaping policies without his knowledge or input. This raises questions about his ability to lead and control his administration effectively.
Either of these will make him unfit to become the president

Diving Mullah
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom