"Target has been celebrating Pride Month for more than a decade. But this year’s collection has led to an increase in confrontations between customers and employees and incidents of Pride merchandise being thrown on the floor, Target spokesperson Kayla Castaneda said.
Target’s action comes on the heels of a conservative backlash against Bud Light after brewer Anheuser-Busch promoted the beer on social media with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.
While various Pride Collection products were under review, the only ones being immediately removed were the LGBTQ brand Abprallen, which has come under scrutiny for its association with the British designer Eric Carnell.
Carnell has faced social media backlash for designing merchandise with images of pentagrams, horned skulls and other symbols."
Link
Will our right-wing friends reveling in the hateful backlash towards businesses showing support for the LGBTQ community realize that it promotes threats of violence, and thus have second thought about it?
Probably not. Seems political violence is increasingly acceptable to them.
Point of fact - not a single threat was reported in the article.
As an example of how shoddy reporting is these days -- the headline of the article says - quote unquote 'Threats' prompt US Target stores to remove some pride collection stuff. Yet, the most important piece of information -- an example of an actual "threat" - is left out of the story.
It cannot be assumed, because we know that the LGBT community will often suggest that merely denying that there are more than two genders is "violence" directed at their community. So, we don't know what they mean by "threat." A threat, in normal English, means that someone has directed a statement of intention to inflict injury on someone. A threat is like "I'm goig to bomb the place" or "I'll kick the shit out of you," or "You better watch out, something might happen to you..." - stuff like that.
How does Target phrase it? They say they received threats (no example given) which "impacted our associates' sense of well-being and safety..." -- well, with all due respect, the LGBT community constantly claims their well-being and safety is impacted - they "feel unsafe" just when people disagree with their ideology. So, I'm not willing to accept the unsupported allegation that threats have been leveled without even seeing an example.
If actual threats were made, wouldn't Target report that to the policy? Wouldn't the threatened emlployees call the cops and make a report? Why not? Are they going to take literal threats like that and NOT seek to protect their employees? If they received threats from customers, have those customers been barred from Target's stores? Who? When? Where? Were these phone calls, rather than in person threats? If they were phone calls, why is there no news report of Target receiving threats over the phone? Why isn't Target asking for local law enforcement to investigate and the FBI local field office to investigate - after all - it would be a "hate crime" with federal jurisdiction.
So -- what are we really talking about here? Customers not liking seeing t-shirts marketed to kids that have devil horns, pentagrams and symbols of Satanism on them? That they don't want "trans" messaging on kids' t-shirts and they are making their objections known? Isn't that probably what is happening here?