I dont know...we have reached a point where using the word 'mother' is offensive...I could see that rationale being accurate.I give you a B for effort on this troll post, but no try again..
Then there's TDS evil, which you bring up even though Trump has nothing to do with the thread...There's chaotic evil, neutral evil, and lawful evil.
Trumpists have created stupid evil, the most unpredictably awful kind of character you could play.
'Trumpists'; or those who follow Trump's line of 'thinking'. In other words, brain-dead idiots.Then there's TDS evil, which you bring up even though Trump has nothing to do with the thread...
Oh for goodness sake! You are seriously trying to compare a human bodily function with a pretty girl in a low-cut top? I've seen kids playing on beaches with women wandering around in ridiculously skimpy beach wear. I have yet to hear of any reports of traumatised kids as a result.
Oh for goodness sake! You are seriously trying to compare a human bodily function with a pretty girl in a low-cut top?
Maybe they thought that image was hurtful to the gay couples that cant have babies...or to the men pretending to be women that also cant have babies. I mean...really....the whole subject of babies is a delicate one where leftists are concerned. I dont suppose the book included colorful drawing of the babies that the leftists celebrate being slaughtered.
Well when it actually happens, start complaining then if you really must. If you feel morally outraged over partially exposed breasts, it's on you.It’s not the feeding of the child that is the problem.
Do you think it’s fine for first grade teachers to dress like that for work?
National Geographic has been long gone then, right?That makes sense. I'm fine with not having pictures of babies breastfeeding in elementary school libraries.
You never know, I'm sure some right wing incel in Florida jerked off to it and then felt guilty and banned it.Why? Is it pornography, or a top-shelf titty book?
Because that is so un-natural.That makes sense. I'm fine with not having pictures of babies breastfeeding in elementary school libraries.
False equivalence.
Ah but that's different; those people are brown and primitive, and NG is simply graphically demonstrating their moral depravity. Just like Florida, in fact.National Geographic has been long gone then, right?
That looks awfully like Ms. LaVolpe, seventh grade math teacher. No, I am not making up the name. We boys learned our math!
Demigoggy?Florida is turning into DeSantis' own little fiefdom. Can you say "demagogue?" I knew that you could.
We had one of those. You never saw such a crowded front row in class!That looks awfully like Ms. LaVolpe, seventh grade math teacher. No, I am not making up the name. We boys learned our math!
I have always had good boots...This is the problem with slippery slopes……….
Looks fake... The angle. The arms. The face is kinda digital looking.That looks awfully like Ms. LaVolpe, seventh grade math teacher. No, I am not making up the name. We boys learned our math!
Nope. I don’t think books with bare tits belong in an elementary school library.
National Geographic has been long gone then, right?
Look down below you Josie. Can you see the shark?
But I recall you are fine with racially insensitive images, such as the Dr. Seuss books that are criticized by his own foundation.Nope. I don’t think books with bare tits belong in an elementary school library.
Well when it actually happens, start complaining then if you really must. If you feel morally outraged over partially exposed breasts, it's on you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?