- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Messages
- 44,932
- Reaction score
- 41,216
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Mamdani is an actual communist, not a "democratic socialist" or whatever soft-pedaling euphemism he is using at the moment.
Prove it.
Mamdani is an actual communist, not a "democratic socialist" or whatever soft-pedaling euphemism he is using at the moment.
This was all in response to a quote from a ‘founding father’ stating property rights were important but taxation was ok.What I realize judging from your assertion is, you make up shit ("Mamdani advances no policies that take property from owners . . . ") that is refuted by Mamdani's own words, e.g.,
Prove it.
Several Communist refugees and New York pols expressed outrage Monday after a clip resurfaced of presumptive Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani noting that one of his goals is “seizing the means of production.”
It's really irrelevant what label you want to put on Mamdani, the fact is, he wants to use government force to take one groups property and redistribute it to another group.
Mamdani also wants to seize the means of production.
See: Zohran Mamdani’s ‘chilling’ call for ‘seizing the means of production’ draws outrage from Communist refugees: ‘Dangerous and scary’
While the phrase "seizing the means of production" is often associated with communist movements, some experts have suggested that Zohran Mamdani's use of it could have been intended as hyperbole rather than a literal policy proposal. It's also important to note that democratic socialism, the ideology Zohran Mamdani identifies with, has historically diverged from communism by not typically advocating for the seizure of the means of production in the same manner, often favoring nationalization of industries with compensation to owners instead.
There is more to Marxism than the ideological arguments made in support of it by Zohran Mamdani, which are made to gather the peoples’ support.
The arguments made are nothing more than a con game by Mamdani to acquire power, and once acquiring that power will live in luxury as the chosen one who is in charge of re-distributing the wealth people have produced.
George Orwell’s Animal Farm is a tutorial on this ancient rope-a-dope con game, which Zohran Mamdani is now perpetrating on the people of NYC.
.
The good people of Cuba fell for Mamdani’s type of game in 1959 when Fidel Castro took over, and they are still paying the price to this very day.
How is that different from any other politician?
Your deflection is noted.![]()
Your deflection is noted. Are you a fan of Mamdani?Answer the question: How is that different from any other politician?
Your deflection is noted. Are you a fan of Mamdani?
Your continued deflection is noted. Are you a fan of Mamdani?Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
Your continued deflection is noted. Are you a fan of Mamdani?
So you won't answer a rational question. This would just imply you KNOW that all politicians take our property and redistribute it.
The subject of the thread is Mamdani.
Are you a fan of Mamdani?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I see you have a fetish for wanting to deflect and switch the subject.
The subject of the thread is not about all other politicians. We are talking about Mamdani.
Are you a fan of Mamdani?
There is more to Marxism than the ideological arguments made in support of it by Zohran Mamdani, which are made to gather the peoples’ support.
The arguments made are nothing more than a con game by Mamdani to acquire power, and once acquiring that power will live in luxury as the chosen one who is in charge of re-distributing the wealth people have produced.
George Orwell’s Animal Farm is a tutorial on this ancient rope-a-dope con game, which Zohran Mamdani is now perpetrating on the people of NYC.
.
The good people of Cuba fell for Mamdani’s type of game in 1959 when Fidel Castro took over, and they are still paying the price to this very day.
NYC's government libraries prefer to groom grade school children with drag queen exhibitions
The subject of the thread is not about all other politicians. It is absurd to speak for, all other politicians. We are here talking about Mamdani.Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
It's really irrelevant what label you want to put on Mamdani, the fact is, he wants to use government force to take one groups property and redistribute it to another group.
Weird how thats not on his political platform and also not even a thing the Mayor of New York would have any power to do.
Mamdani also wants to seize the means of production.
See: Zohran Mamdani’s ‘chilling’ call for ‘seizing the means of production’ draws outrage from Communist refugees: ‘Dangerous and scary’
The subject of the thread is not about all other politicians. It is absurd to speak for, all other politicians. We are here talking about Mamdani.
The subject of this thread is how fantastically your OP failed when you demonstrated you dont really understand anything about Mamdani, Animal Farm, or George Orwell.
The subject of the thread is Mamdani.
Are you a fan of Mamdani?
It's absurd to attack a politician for campaigning on the same thing literally every other politician campaigns on (taking and redistributing property).
Do all other politicians propose to tax "whiter" neighborhoods higher?
The subject of the thread is not about all other politicians. We are here talking about Mamdani.
Are you a fan of Mamdani?