- Joined
- Sep 28, 2017
- Messages
- 9,718
- Reaction score
- 3,071
- Location
- Blue State America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You have any proof?...Or are you spouting some Alt Right Bvll**** you read somewhere?
They're the same folks that defend a sittimg president who spied on a presidential candidate.
And the funny thing is they are going to say "this is blaming it on Obama" or "This is blaming it on Hillary" when oin fact...no...its not blaming the acts of anyone...it is pointing out the hypocrisy of people that spent 8 years of the previous administration fawning over them and making excuses for every ethical breach that are now desperate to fund SOMETHING.
Pretense of concern about conflict of interest...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. But the Clinton speaking schedule as Sec State, and selling access to the State Dept...why...thats just...nothing.
Not PERSONAL schedule. You threw that part in to try and make it look bad. It's the professional schedule that is a problem. If you leave a meeting in one city at this time, and have to be at a meeting in another city at this time, there are times the schedules will not meet up. Keep in mind WE are going to use this if the Democrats ever regain any power at the federal level. We will question every flight, every office supply order...
Remind me where we differ on this.
The leg of the trip that we (based on the OP) are questioning is a trip home from Las Vegas. That sounds incredibly personal to me.
The post before the one I just posted.
Oh, sorry. okay. I think it's rampant. You're link says it isn't. An investigation will tell the tale.
In what way? Companies list their airplanes with chartering companies. Customers go to the chartering companies to buy a charter. I don't know whether or not the charter company chooses the plane or the customer since I don't charter them myself. This sounds like a complaint without a problem. The problem is that he chartered the jet in the first place.
Maybe he needed to change clothes, let the dog out, pick up a presentation, who knows... But if this is all you all can find to hate on... Keep on. Here's the #PettyAward
When Bill and Hillary fly they are required to compensate the government for the cost of a plane ticket. The same as any other former president and first lady. My point was that the Carters fly commercial, should it be required of everyone? You threw out that a former Sec did it. DeVos pays for her own travel, should everyone have to because she does it?
I just seems pretty damn fishy to me. As I pointed out earlier, I don't even so much as take a lunch from a vendor because I consider it unethical so personally I would not be on a chartered plane owned by the execs in an industry that spends hundreds of millions of dollars a year on lobbying and other attempts to influence government policy.
Do you think that the Secretary even knew who owned the plane? Someone on his staff charters it and he flies. Do you think the plane is even in the name of the executive or a holding company of some sorts?
I have no idea if he did or did not, but I would be surprised if he didn't know who owned it. Particularly considering the amount of money the oil industry spends lobbying and buying influence with government in a given year. At any rate, it looks bad and that is the point. People that make small unethical decisions also tend to make big unethical decisions.
In what way? Companies list their airplanes with chartering companies. Customers go to the chartering companies to buy a charter. I don't know whether or not the charter company chooses the plane or the customer since I don't charter them myself. This sounds like a complaint without a problem. The problem is that he chartered the jet in the first place.
Dood...you could have been sitting in her office while the deals were going down (and not just bothered to take the time to read emails) and you would still deny it.Selling access?...You have proof?......No because none exists except in the mind of the Alt Right conspiracy freaks
I know thats (NOT "waiting" and "seeing") what is happening in the article cited and in this thread.You don't know that. Not at all. And if Price has written a check back for $51,000, what does that tell you an investigation will turn up? I just hope "they" investigate it fairly and include the Obama White House.
I know thats (NOT "waiting" and "seeing") what is happening in the article cited and in this thread.
Dood...you could have been sitting in her office while the deals were going down (and not just bothered to take the time to read emails) and you would still deny it.
Rats love their sycophants.
I just seems pretty damn fishy to me. As I pointed out earlier, I don't even so much as take a lunch from a vendor because I consider it unethical so personally I would not be on a chartered plane owned by the execs in an industry that spends hundreds of millions of dollars a year on lobbying and other attempts to influence government policy.
Really? Who owns N757AF which is registered to DJT OPERATIONS I LLC, DOVER , DE, US. They want to lease it. Will you worry about who owns the company or who the officers are? Did you have to look that up to see who it was?
You have any proof?...Or are you spouting some Alt Right Bvll**** you read somewhere?
I just pointed out your guy is on track to outspend all of his predecessors on travel expenses and you are saying nothing. So even if the Obama's were inefficient in their use of planes for travel, Trump so far has been an order of magnitude worse in terms of blowing taxpayer money on his travel expenses. Yet all you can do is bring up Obama. It is pathetic.
What about: they were all pre-cleared by ethics officials in the department.
In the Dept he runs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?