• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Zelenskyy urges world to heed Ukraine’s ‘terror’ attack warning

Zelensky has said peace requires Putin leave Ukraine. That's the only acceptable outcome.

How much of Poland should Putin be allowed to take?
But Putin isn't going to leave. So that demand is a non starter. I prefer a negotiating position that is more grounded in reality.
 
Like America did in Korea then?

Leaving aside the United States is not a party to this conflict outside of support and is not actively engaged in combate with Russia, I don't think anyone would have a problem with there being a demilitarized zone between Russia and Ukraine. Russia has to leave first.
 
But Putin isn't going to leave. So that demand is a non starter. I prefer a negotiating position that is more grounded in reality.

But you cannot, or will not, articulate what you think is even plausible here. Moreover, you are ignoring Putin's character assuming he will all of a sudden negotiate.
 
Someone is arguing to justify their user name a little too hard and weak in the details portion.
 
Russia has to leave first.
Not really.
- All troop movements stop. Cease fire.
- DMZ established
-Troops advance or withdraw to DMZ established.
 
Then maybe they should try offering Putin something that he wants, in exchange for peace. That's usually how negotiations work. You can't just expect to be given everything that you want for free.

We've seen that script before. The main characters in the story were Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler.
 
We've seen that script before. The main characters in the story were Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler.
Armchair historians who criticize Neville Chamberlain probably would have made the same decisions, were they in his shoes.
 
That's a false binary. A negotiated peace is not a surrender. I do not propose that Ukraine lay down their arms. I propose that they negotiate realistically.

And if the pre-negotiated conditions set by Russia are unacceptable...?
 
And if the pre-negotiated conditions set by Russia are unacceptable...?
Then the war continues, until both sides are willing to accept something less than what they originally wanted.
 
Good luck with that.
I trust the Ukrainian people know what they're doing. It's their country, not mine. Wish them good luck.

Please do. I'd prefer not to let more people die pointlessly.
Nobody in Ukraine knows you exist, much less cares what you think. Funny how you think you're "letting" something happen. Lol.
 
The war continues until Russia cuts its losses and leaves.
Except they're not going to leave. So you can either negotiate peace now, or wait a couple more years so more people can die first.
 
But Putin isn't going to leave. So that demand is a non starter. I prefer a negotiating position that is more grounded in reality.
That's the variable here, and what Ukrainians are trying to do is make it difficult for Russia to remain. We've seen this dynamic in other recent conflicts (Vietnam, Afghanistan) where the cost of trying to maintain the war becomes too high for the invading force, and ultimately they leave. The thing here is the same applies for the efforts to support Ukraine, since that's costly for the allies doing it. Where the negotiation aspect is concerning is Putin's already taken Ukrainian land before, and there's little doubt he would do so again even with an agreement in place.

Putin's attempt here was to bring Ukraine back into Russia's sphere of influence, which essentially means Ukrainians who don't want that have no choice but to surrender to his will. He didn't march into the Donbas, he launched a full invasion on multiple fronts in an attempt to usurp the existing government; there should be no reward for that kind of action, especially when there are no assurances it ends there. If you remember, Putin doesn't even acknowledge Ukraine as being a separate nation from Russia, so I put little stock in him not invading again even if Ukraine agreed to surrender some territory. This is about more than just territory based on what he's publicly expressed and made pretty clear.
 
Back
Top Bottom