• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Zelensky PUTS SCREWS INTO Trump after NEW BETRAYAL

ROFL

The stupid game Marxists play.

{
Republican lawmakers immediately accused the administration of handing Russian President Vladimir Putin a major political victory. Democrats urged the White House to reconsider, and the Kremlin called the news a "positive signal."


The State Department announced the decision in a report to Congress. The move was first reported by Axios.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken opted to waive sanctions against the Russian-owned company behind the pipeline, Nord Stream 2 AG, as well as its German CEO, Matthias Warnig, and other corporate officers, because sanctions "would negatively impact U.S. relations with Germany, the EU and other European allies and partners," said the State Department report, which was obtained by NBC News.}


Play your game and scream "NUHN UHN" now.

You're comparing this to Trump abandoning our commitment to an ally?
 
There is nothing to gain from supporting Russia in any way so explain Trump's love of Putin. I can't.
Think Trump Tower Moscow.
 
You're comparing this to Trump abandoning our commitment to an ally?

What ally and what commitment? President Trump isn’t abandoning any allies or commitments to them. Ukraine has never been an ally of ours, never a significant trading partner, shares no formal alliances with America, has never been in our sphere of influence, and shares no historic economic, cultural, or diplomatic ties with the United States.
 
What ally and what commitment? President Trump isn’t abandoning any allies or commitments to them. Ukraine has never been an ally of ours, never a significant trading partner, shares no formal alliances with America, has never been in our sphere of influence, and shares no historic economic, cultural, or diplomatic ties with the United States.

Ukraine has been independent and nonaligned since 1991. The US got involved with Ukraine via The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances of 1994. The US decided to support the Euromaidan movement in 2013 and then help Ukraine to resist Russian land grabs in Crimea and two oblasts in eastern Ukraine (Donbas). Via Euromaidan and subsequent new laws by parliament, Ukraine removed herself from any so-called "Russian sphere" and openly courted closer ties with Europe ( the European Union Association Agreement) and with Washington. The US built a brand new embassy in Kyiv (the embassy compound covers one square city block) and US assistence began to pour in.

iu


I'ts odd that since the massive Russian invasion of 24 February 2022, not even one solitary Russian ballistic missile, cruise missile, or kamakazee drone has exploded in the US Embassy cpmpound.

Anyone with even half-a-brain would conclude that Russia does in fact know exactly where its missile/drone munitions will detonate.

Which leads to the conclusion that Russian missile/drone attacks on civilian targets are purposeful, are commissioned for the sake of abject terrorism, and are war crimes.
 
You're comparing this to Trump abandoning our commitment to an ally?

What ally?

You mean this?



LOL, the drones are programmed to love Ukraine - not America - but Ukraine. Oh, and Trump resumed welfare to the land of embezzlement that you so love.
 
What ally and what commitment? President Trump isn’t abandoning any allies or commitments to them. Ukraine has never been an ally of ours, never a significant trading partner, shares no formal alliances with America, has never been in our sphere of influence, and shares no historic economic, cultural, or diplomatic ties with the United States.

Maybe she meant the Sinaloa Cartel, who are indeed close allies with the democrat party and particularly the Biden Cartel.
 
Ukraine has been independent and nonaligned since 1991. The US got involved with Ukraine via The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances of 1994.

In June 1992, Russia and the USA formally launched the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program. This initiative funded the dismantlement and secure storage of nuclear weapons and materials in former Soviet republics. On December 5, 1994, Ukraine agreed to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as a non-nuclear state in exchange for "security assurances" from the United States, Russia, and the United Kingdom. Under the Budapest Memorandum, the signatories pledged to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and refrain from using force or economic coercion. Let’s be clear: the only "security guarantee" was that, in the event of an invasion, the matter would be referred to the UN Security Council—there were no actual guarantees of military assistance.

Regarding Ukraine’s inherited nuclear arsenal following the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was the third-largest in the world yet Ukraine never had operational control. Launch authority remained in Moscow’s hands, relying on Russian-controlled Permissive Action Links (PALs) and centralized command systems. In short, Ukraine could not unilaterally fire those weapons. Consequently, Ukraine transferred its nuclear warheads to Russia for dismantlement under CTR programs and formally joined the NPT, relinquishing its nuclear arsenal by 1996.

The US decided to support the Euromaidan movement in 2013 and then help Ukraine to resist Russian land grabs in Crimea and two oblasts in eastern Ukraine (Donbas). Via Euromaidan and subsequent new laws by parliament, Ukraine removed herself from any so-called "Russian sphere" and openly courted closer ties with Europe ( the European Union Association Agreement) and with Washington.
The U.S. didn’t merely “decide to support” the Euromaidan Color Revolution—the Obama regime caused it. On November 21, 2013, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych formally chose to maintain Ukraine’s long-standing political, cultural, and economic relationship with Russia, rather than proceed with the EU association agreement.

Shortly after Yanukovych’s decision, President Barack Obama was reportedly furious—almost like a jilted lover. In retaliation, he unleashed his Color Revolution Dominatrix, Victoria Nuland, and set his coup plans into motion, determined to punish Ukraine for rejecting his overtures.

The coup succeeded. Protests and violence escalated, culminating in deadly shootings in Maidan Square. Not long after, Obama’s coup was complete and Yanukovych was forced from power.

The US built a brand new embassy in Kyiv (the embassy compound covers one square city block) and US assistence began to pour in. (image redacted for brevity reasons)

After Obama’s coup was complete, a new contract was awarded in May 2011 to dramatically expand and fortify the embassy. Following the model of the “Green Zone”—the fortified presence established after W. Bush and President Cheney’s dumb invasion of Iraq—Obama sought to create a facility to cement control over its vassal state.
I'ts odd that since the massive Russian invasion of 24 February 2022, not even one solitary Russian ballistic missile, cruise missile, or kamakazee drone has exploded in the US Embassy cpmpound.
Anyone with even half-a-brain would conclude that Russia does in fact know exactly where its missile/drone munitions will detonate.

Which leads to the conclusion that Russian missile/drone attacks on civilian targets are purposeful, are commissioned for the sake of abject terrorism, and are war crimes.

Russia not attacking the facility is expected behavior—even in times of conflict. For example, under the Clinton administration, America inadvertently bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. Despite that faux pas, the USA never attacked or bombed any nation’s embassy—whether intentionally or inadvertently—during our invasion of Iraq.

It’s estimated that around 200,000 civilians died as a result of the US invasion Iraq. Are you asserting that the US intentionally targeted civilians?
 
In June 1992, Russia and the USA formally launched the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program. This initiative funded the dismantlement and secure storage of nuclear weapons and materials in former Soviet republics. On December 5, 1994, Ukraine agreed to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as a non-nuclear state in exchange for "security assurances" from the United States, Russia, and the United Kingdom. Under the Budapest Memorandum, the signatories pledged to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and refrain from using force or economic coercion. Let’s be clear: the only "security guarantee" was that, in the event of an invasion, the matter would be referred to the UN Security Council—there were no actual guarantees of military assistance.

Yes, let's be clear. Moscow invaded Ukraine despite "assurances" that it wouldn't. Moscow has violated every treaty signed with Ukraine since independence.

You can bet that Kyiv won't again fall for such Budapest sematics knowing Moscow's treachery and Trump's disdain for NATO and his fetish for Vladimir Putin.
 
Yes, let's be clear. Moscow invaded Ukraine despite "assurances" that it wouldn't. Moscow has violated every treaty signed with Ukraine since independence.

You're overlooking—or deliberately misstating—history. Russia didn't intervene militarily in Ukraine until after Obama and his color-revolution dominatrix (Nuland) staged the 2014 coup that sparked the country's civil war. That war led to the Minsk I and Minsk II agreements, both of which were violated by the Ukrainian government when it continued shelling civilians in the Donbas region.

By the way, Ukraine and Russia were reportedly close to reaching a peace agreement just weeks after the current war began. Russia agreed to withdraw its troops, and Ukraine would remain neutral—no NATO membership. But Zelenskyy backed out (he has a habit of walking away from deals, as the U.S. has also discovered during the failed minerals negotiations) after the Biden administration sent Boris Johnson to Kyiv to kill the agreement.

You can bet that Kyiv won't again fall for such Budapest sematics knowing Moscow's treachery and Trump's disdain for NATO and his fetish for Vladimir Putin.

Who’s quibbling over “Budapest semantics” and insisting the only remedy is a trip to the UN Security Council? The real first step is to embrace a peace framework: agree on terms, impose a cease-fire, then sit down for negotiations.

A more practical model is the Korean War armistice and partition—fighting stopped, a buffer zone established, yet no formal peace treaty. Apply that to Ukraine: once the guns fall silent, hold elections. Let residents of Donbas choose independence or reintegration (I suspect they’ll choose independence). Once a newly elected government is in place in Ukraine (whether led by Zelenskyy or not), let that new government negotiate with Russia to end the violence.
 
You're overlooking—or deliberately misstating—history. Russia didn't intervene militarily in Ukraine until after Obama and his color-revolution dominatrix (Nuland) staged the 2014 coup that sparked the country's civil war. That war led to the Minsk I and Minsk II agreements, both of which were violated by the Ukrainian government when it continued shelling civilians in the Donbas region.

By the way, Ukraine and Russia were reportedly close to reaching a peace agreement just weeks after the current war began. Russia agreed to withdraw its troops, and Ukraine would remain neutral—no NATO membership. But Zelenskyy backed out (he has a habit of walking away from deals, as the U.S. has also discovered during the failed minerals negotiations) after the Biden administration sent Boris Johnson to Kyiv to kill the agreement.



Who’s quibbling over “Budapest semantics” and insisting the only remedy is a trip to the UN Security Council? The real first step is to embrace a peace framework: agree on terms, impose a cease-fire, then sit down for negotiations.

A more practical model is the Korean War armistice and partition—fighting stopped, a buffer zone established, yet no formal peace treaty. Apply that to Ukraine: once the guns fall silent, hold elections. Let residents of Donbas choose independence or reintegration (I suspect they’ll choose independence). Once a newly elected government is in place in Ukraine (whether led by Zelenskyy or not), let that new government negotiate with Russia to end the violence.

"Obama and his color-revolution dominatrix (Nuland) staged the 2014 coup"

Hyperbolic misrepresentation of reality.
 
"Obama and his color-revolution dominatrix (Nuland) staged the 2014 coup"

Hyperbolic misrepresentation of reality.

Right—because we’re supposed to believe the U.S. has never meddled in another country’s internal affairs! Victoria Nuland was literally caught on tape discussing which puppet leaders she wanted installed. But sure, tell us more about how Washington just promotes “democracy.”

 
Right—because we’re supposed to believe the U.S. has never meddled in another country’s internal affairs! Victoria Nuland was literally caught on tape discussing which puppet leaders she wanted installed. But sure, tell us more about how Washington just promotes “democracy.”




Was the world not a aware that we were supporting Ukrainians in their effort to get out from under Putin's heel?
 
You're overlooking—or deliberately misstating—history. Russia didn't intervene militarily in Ukraine until after Obama and his color-revolution dominatrix (Nuland) staged the 2014 coup that sparked the country's civil war. That war led to the Minsk I and Minsk II agreements, both of which were violated by the Ukrainian government when it continued shelling civilians in the Donbas region.

By the way, Ukraine and Russia were reportedly close to reaching a peace agreement just weeks after the current war began. Russia agreed to withdraw its troops, and Ukraine would remain neutral—no NATO membership. But Zelenskyy backed out (he has a habit of walking away from deals, as the U.S. has also discovered during the failed minerals negotiations) after the Biden administration sent Boris Johnson to Kyiv to kill the agreement.



Who’s quibbling over “Budapest semantics” and insisting the only remedy is a trip to the UN Security Council? The real first step is to embrace a peace framework: agree on terms, impose a cease-fire, then sit down for negotiations.

A more practical model is the Korean War armistice and partition—fighting stopped, a buffer zone established, yet no formal peace treaty. Apply that to Ukraine: once the guns fall silent, hold elections. Let residents of Donbas choose independence or reintegration (I suspect they’ll choose independence). Once a newly elected government is in place in Ukraine (whether led by Zelenskyy or not), let that new government negotiate with Russia to end the violence.


Hmmm

"The agreement failed to stop fighting.[5] At the start of January 2015, Russia sent another large batch of its regular military.[2] Following the Russian victory at Donetsk International Airport in defiance of the Protocol..."
 
Right—because we’re supposed to believe the U.S. has never meddled in another country’s internal affairs! Victoria Nuland was literally caught on tape discussing which puppet leaders she wanted installed. But sure, tell us more about how Washington just promotes “democracy.”



Wow. Diplomats discussing potential national leaders.....

Damn them!
 
Right—because we’re supposed to believe the U.S. has never meddled in another country’s internal affairs!

While you disingenuously ignore Moscow's meddling in the affairs of others.....

Finland, Poland, Lithuania, Estionia, Latvia, East Germany, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Checkoslovakia, Chechnya, Cuba, Egypt, Sudan, Ukraine, Transnistria, Georgia, Syria, Republic of the Congo, 21 other African nations, ad nauseum.
 
Was the world not a aware that we were supporting Ukrainians in their effort to get out from under Putin's heel?

What time frame are you referring to? How was Obama's initiating the 2014 Ukrainian Coup, toppling the democratically elected President? If the people voted for Yanukevich, how were they under Putin's heel?

If you are referring to the Biden proxy war, how can the world not know? Is the world not aware that Ukraine is losing the war, and in the process, continuing to kill thousands of people every day in a battle it cannot win. The solution is to end the war now, just like the Korean war ended.
 
What time frame are you referring to? How was Obama's initiating the 2014 Ukrainian Coup, toppling the democratically elected President? If the people voted for Yanukevich, how were they under Putin's heel?

If you are referring to the Biden proxy war, how can the world not know? Is the world not aware that Ukraine is losing the war, and in the process, continuing to kill thousands of people every day in a battle it cannot win. The solution is to end the war now, just like the Korean war ended.


The president was impeached.
 
While you disingenuously ignore Moscow's meddling in the affairs of others.....

Finland, Poland, Lithuania, Estionia, Latvia, East Germany, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Checkoslovakia, Chechnya, Cuba, Egypt, Sudan, Ukraine, Transnistria, Georgia, Syria, Republic of the Congo, 21 other African nations, ad nauseum.

Russia can meddle. Other's can't. That's the Putin logic.
 
While you disingenuously ignore Moscow's meddling in the affairs of others.....

Finland, Poland, Lithuania, Estionia, Latvia, East Germany, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Checkoslovakia, Chechnya, Cuba, Egypt, Sudan, Ukraine, Transnistria, Georgia, Syria, Republic of the Congo, 21 other African nations, ad nauseum.

Did you forget that the Soviet Union officially ceased to exist on December 26, 1991?
 
Russia can meddle. Other's can't. That's the Putin logic.
Yet, you cheered Obama's 2014 coup -- and then complain when Russia intervened in the civil war that Obama started. So what is it -- are you against any nation meddling in another nation's internal affairs, or only when a nation you don't like does it?
 
How was Obama's initiating the 2014 Ukrainian Coup, toppling the democratically elected President? If the people voted for Yanukevich, how were they under Putin's heel?

The Ukraine Parliament removed the traitor* Yanukovych 338-0 on 22 February 2014 per the 2004 Constitution.

* No hyperbole. Yanukovych was convicted of Treason in 2019 and sentenced, in absentia, to 13 years imprisonment.
 
Obama's coup = Stupid talk

The Ukrainian government removed Yanukovich from office after he ran away.

You are "conveniently" skipping over what Obama and his Color Revolution Dominatrix, Victoria Nuland, did leading up to President Yanukovych fleeing Kyiv on 21 Feb 2024. That was simply the culmination of Obama and his Color Revolution Dominatrix plans that not only toppled a popularly elected government in a foreign nation, but also led to the civil war in Ukraine that Russia intervened in.

Viktor Yanukovych became President of Ukraine after winning the presidential election on February 7, 2010, defeating Yulia Tymoshenko in a runoff (48.95% to 45.47%), and he took office on February 25, 2010, for a five-year term set to end in 2015. During his presidency, the Obama administration and European leaders pushed for Ukraine to sign an association agreement with the EU—a move that would have deepened economic and political ties, drawing Ukraine away from Russian influence and toward Western integration.

The trigger for the 2014 Ukrainian Civil War — “Obama’s Coup”— occurred on November 21, 2013, when Yanukovych abruptly suspended negotiations for the EU Association Agreement. Instead, he chose to maintain Ukraine’s historical ties with Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union after receiving financial incentives from Vladimir Putin, including a promised $15 billion loan. In response, Obama and his “Color Revolution Dominatrix,” Victoria Nuland, orchestrated a color revolution. This sparked protests in Kyiv’s Maidan Nezalezhnosti, which began peacefully but escalated after police crackdowns, such as the beatings on November 30. Unlike the 2004 Orange Revolution, which centered on election fraud, the 2014 upheaval was rooted in a rejection of policy and governance—a clear pro-EU pivot.

The coup led to violent protests between February 18 and 20, 2014, resulting in over 100 deaths and prompting Obama and the EU to call for Yanukovych’s ouster. Nuland, who played a central role in organizing the coup, was even caught on a phone call discussing her choice of a new puppet leader. Although Yanukovych’s term was supposed to run until February 25, 2015, he fled Kyiv on February 21, 2014, amid the chaos, eventually seeking exile in Russia. The following day, on February 22, 2014, Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada voted 328–0 to remove Yanukovych, citing his “self-withdrawal” from office per Constitution Article 108. With his ouster, what some call Obama’s coup was complete. Subsequently, the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk declared their independence after referendums—89% and 96% of voters, respectively, favored independence—plunging Ukraine into a violent civil conflict.

BTW, Color Revolution Dominatrix Victoria Nuland was literally caught on tape discussing which puppet leaders she wanted installed. But sure, tell us more about how Washington just promotes “democracy” and how Viktor Yanukovych simply "ran away" from his office...

 
Back
Top Bottom