- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 79,713
- Reaction score
- 27,095
- Location
- Portlandia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Doesn't make any sense. Kerry isn't saying refrigerators are dangerous. But you thought he was saying that, because someone told you he said that.
So...
Is it your contention that Kerry is saying that ISIS is not dangerous?
LOL...
This is fun!
Let me help you out, because every single right-winger has missed this. (because not one of you actually listened to or read Kerry's statement and instead let a blogger tell you what Kerry said.)
Kerry was saying climate change as a whole was as important an issue as ISIL. Not "killer refrigerators."
I used to live in Tucson, and when my air conditioning died I understood why the Indians were so ornery!
I live in Sacramento now, and it is not surviveable here without air conditioning! I see why ISIS is so ill tempered!
Are you saying that Sacramento is hotter than Tuscon? Why?
Post 14 represents more alarmist propaganda.
But it is not as important of an issue.
Period.
How can anyone think that?
The new refrigerants are harmless at the levels they are released in the atmosphere.
Yes, I've read it. Now give me the larger context that changes the meaning of that passage.
He's talking about climate change as a whole being as important an issue as ISIL, not "killer refrigerators."
The two sentences the bloggers keep giving you are six paragraphs apart. And you're still taking their interpretation.
So why haven't you posted the complete quotes in context?
Are you saying that Sacramento is hotter than Tuscon? Why?
He's talking about climate change as a whole being as important an issue as ISIL, not "killer refrigerators."
The two sentences the bloggers keep giving you are six paragraphs apart. And you're still taking their interpretation.
Nope. In that quote he specifically says what they are doing THERE (Montreal Protocol) is as important as fighting ISIS.
Kerry is comparing the Montreal Protocol w/ regard to climate change to ISIS with regard to the Middle East.
The larger contexts of AGW alarmism and world peace don't change the stupid comparison even a little.
Yes, and dealing with climate change is just as important as fighting ISIS.
It's harder for people to accept, because they think ISIS is some direct, physical, immediate threat to them whereas climate change is more of an indefinite, long term, indirect threat and our brains just aren't really wired to see them as being equal. ISIS is a bunch of violent religious lunatics but that's all they're ever going to be. They're a nasty regional problem, not a global threat. Americans are freaking out about them but statistically you and I are literally more likely to be killed by bees. (~58 deaths per year)
But I'm glad you've backtracked from the "killer refrigerator" nonsense bloggers have been vomiting everywhere.
And how many people has AGW killed? Zero.
This is precisely what I was talking about with the indirect, indefinite threat and how the human brain isn't wired to accept it.
Pinning any specific person's death on AGW is essentially impossible, so you guys will always convince yourself the number is zero.
It's so weird... you seem to grasp why Kerry's comparison of Refrigerator coolant and ISIS was so stupid and yet you still try to defend it.
He wasn't comparing refrigerator coolant to ISIS. He was comparing global warming to ISIS.
But some blogger told you different and you'll do whatever mental gymnastics it takes to keep believing that.
Again, no he wasn't. He may have been making a larger comparison between the War on Terror and the War on Climate Change, but he couched the war on ISIS and the War on Refrigerators as equal in importance. You are just suffering from cognative dissonance and can't read his words for their actual meaning right now.
Someday, maybe you'll be able to....
Nope, Kerry told me directly. I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't get your marching orders from some blogger, though.
The Montreal Protocol is not a "war on refrigerators," sorry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?