- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020
- Messages
- 7,191
- Reaction score
- 4,556
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Nah, it’s a boomer thing. They’re hyper competitive and would sell their own children for a nickel.I think it's generally targeting gen xyz
Nah, it’s a boomer thing. They’re hyper competitive and would sell their own children for a nickel.I think it's generally targeting gen xyz
Keep revealing dumbass, you're doing greatNah, it’s a boomer thing. They’re hyper competitive and would sell their own children for a nickel.
Must be a southern thing otherwise my dad would have used it by now.
Keep revealing dumbass, you're doing great
2 schools of thought on that...Old people complaining about the debt and arguing we need to raise the retirement age when you tell them they need to go back to work
View attachment 67501234
I like how every plan to raise the age you get SS always includes a grace period where the people currently on it still get it and only Millennials and Gen Z will have to work longer
Before what? Is highroller your dirty sock?Lol, oh man, you're not gonna last long, here. Who were you before?
Before what?
Imagine getting all emotional, or at least pretending to for affect, over something so stupid
Imagine getting all emotional, or at least pretending to for affect, over something so stupid
You're emoting, literally. The only question is why ...You're projecting.
So I can come in your house and use my toilet and shower whenever I want?All of us.
If it is correct that property taxes are a major source of revenue at the state and local levels, how does anyone propose to make up for the shortfall the policy proposed in this thread would cause?
First of all @medi I feel like I need to clarify I don't actually think all home owners should be forced to rent their homes and threatened with homelessness.I cannot speak for @Nomad4Ever , but I'd imagine people would still be paying a site rent. And those living in more 'desirable' locations would pay a higher rent based on the value of the location. Just instead of a landlord, the money goes directly to government coffers. Why do we need a middleman?
Maybe common among bigots--as I'm not one to hang around with them, I'm from the North, and I've never heard it either.Or maybe not, since it's a common refrain
Joe Biden should immediately make you HUD secretary and run on your planThe government would own all the land and facilitate housing. If people got too lazy it would just raise rents since apparently the threat of homelessness is what makes people productive workers.
Therefore under my plan we would have a much more productive workforce.
You're emoting, literally. The only question is why ...
Thank you so much for your sincere concern with my reputation.Maybe common among bigots--as I'm not one to hang around with them, I'm from the North, and I've never heard it either.
Now I know NEVER to use it. You should eliminate it from your lexicon too, just to portray yourself correctly in debates. Just an FYI
If asking you why you're so triggered is triggered, what is this?I used an emote, yes. Question is why did that trigger you?
You're welcome.Thank you so much for your sincere concern with my reputation.
YepCertainly does,
My son when his grandparents die, and my wife and I die will likely have an inheritance of $ 2.5 million in today's Canadian dollars in various assets. Of course that likely will be 40 years into the future
Thank you. Renters have been opposed by the home owning elite for too long. Renters of the world unite.Joe Biden should immediately make you HUD secretary and run on your plan
So property taxes would be replaced by a tax on the land . . .
There are millions upon millions of Americans who will inherit nothing, and in fact, will be financially burdened by their parents.
Yes.Thank you. Renters have been opposed by the home owning elite for too long. Renters of the world unite.
Please allow me to take this slowly. Even though you wrote that you are not serious, I am.
The government is the governing body that would own the land. Individuals or private organizations would be paying the tax/rent to the government for the land.So this part of your answer (And thank you for the response, by the way.) - - - this:
Who would be paying the tax on the land, if the land is owned by the government? And which governing body would own the land?