- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 12,879
- Reaction score
- 2,707
- Location
- New England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Why not? You assume that cure will involve some dread treatment, like chemotherapy?
I already have my "cure" for Cancer, should I ever get it. I watched 3 of my 4 grandparents and my father die of Cancer; sorry I'm not interested in going through any of that stuff, whether it's a cure or a funeral at the end.
Science in my humble uneducated opninion is necessary must be nutured and CONTROLLED. I believe the "mad scientist syndrome" can exist and do harm and I do believe that scientists will lie through their teeth to get their name published in some book somewhere and that has happened many times already.
Science is the way we learn and progress...but it has to be controlled and not let to its own designs totally.. Just recently all the lieing on both sides about global warming has so diluted the truth...no one really knows what the hell the truth is.
How horrible. I'm so sorry, Tigger.
Science is the Ultimate fundamendalist fanatical religious cult
Yeah I know, what has science ever gotten us?
The difference that comes into play is whether it actually lacks a solid base or people percieve that it lacks a solid base.
Yes, right from the wiki. And again I believe the scientific method and the meaning of scientific theory should be taught along with the fact that evolution is a scientific theory.
Nope. This is absolutely the wrong thing to do, if it is meant to convey to students that evolution is in doubt.
Yeah I know, what has science ever gotten us?
I don't think scientists believing in their hypotheses in necessarily problematic, so long as they stop believing when they are proven wrong. And I think it's a good thing that scientists believe in the possibility of vaccines before creating or discovering them since that belief may give them the push needed to create/discover it in the first place.This is very true fortunately they are in a very small minority and are caught rather quickly. the scientiifc community as a whole has our own punishment for them
Old argument...I dont think anyone really doubts evolution...where the doubt comes in is how the very first life form was created to begin the process of evolution, the very first lifeform could not have evolved.
(NEWSER) – Disneyland, pshaw. Soon the new hot amusement park will be located in Kentucky, and called ... Ark Encounter. The Christian theme park will include, among other attractions, a 500-foot-long Noah's Ark complete with live animals, a Tower of Babel replica, and a re-created first-century Middle Eastern village. "Make no mistake about it, this is a huge deal," says the governor, who is backing the park despite criticisms about its ideology.
The park, a collaboration between a for-profit company and the non-profit that runs Kentucky's Creation Museum, is stirring up controversy because developers are asking for tourism development tax incentives of up to $37.5 million, the Courier-Journal reports. Opponents say such incentives would violate the constitutional separation of church and state. Another point of controversy: whether the park will be allowed to discriminate on the basis of religion when hiring, as the Creation Museum does. Assuming those concerns fall on deaf ears, the park is expected to open in 2014.
O yes, they do. Kentucky is building a "creationism theme park", in large part with taxpayer dollars.
Coming to Kentucky: Creationism Theme Park - Complete with 500-foot Noah's Ark replica
Who created the very first life form...or what...or where did it come from
Who created the very first life form...or what...or where did it come from
The scientific method originated with the experimental validation that Eratosthenes carried out about 2200 years ago. He determined the circumference of the earth to within about +/- 5% accuracy, using a theory that the earth is spherical and that the curvature of the earth could be determined using shadows cast at different locations on the earth's surface
It was in the temple of science where the Priests developed the digital computer and the internet.
You need to pray to the Quantum Mechanical deity
"Life" is not a bright line. I do believe that one celled organisms emerged from the ooze.
Easey-peasey.
It is plausible, and possible that the "what" is just chemistry.
Where do you think the first living organism came from or who created it
Thats all one sides opinion...they have NO CLUE where the very very start of life came from...whether it was created....one thing is for certain...science didnt create it in a test tube...there was no science then..
Well, science would say that the origins of life started with the Big Bang.
No one created it; it evolved. I guess I imagine something like Dr. Frankenstein on a molecular level -- highly conductive elements, animated by electricity.
So, a question for you: will your faith be impaired if ever they discover life existed on Mars?
It's not a theory, lpast. Scientists can create life.
BBC News - 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?