• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

You Can Blame The Tea Party For The Current Inept State Of Our Federal Government

You mean the two years when Obama inherited an economy in free fall and a bunch of wars?

Stop making excuses for this administration. The Trump administration failed to protect you and your family. Trump is incompetent. That's the reality.

Why not support a competent Republican who won't get us all killed? Is that really too much to ask?
Yeah, you are barkin up the wrong tree, buddy :)
 
Last edited:
It's not a slur. You have yet to offer a persuasive counter argument as to why the racist Tea Party became prominent right after Obama's election in 2008.

Obviously, it's because Obama was the first black President.

You keep calling people racists. That's a slur. A slur typical of leftists applied to people that have the temerity to disagree with them.
It use is designed to silence political opposition and the squash debate of these different opinions, points of view and political positions.
Apparently the left isn't happy when there's opposition or other opinions than they want and what they believe.

Your view of government is absurd, vapid, and childish, quite frankly. But this is typical of you misguided, uninformed Tea Party types.

When government builds infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and mass transit systems, they are not "transfer agents" or whatever stupid term that you used earlier. They are creating a strong foundation for an economy to function efficiently. That has intrinsic value in and of itself.

Plus, you don't acknowledge how government has made our society healthier through programs like Medicare, Medicare, medical research, etc. Having a healthier, longer living workforce also has significant intrinsic value to our economy. Fighting pollution via the EPA also helps create a healthier society, which also improves our economy.

And government also plays a massive role in technological innovation. The Dept of Defense created the precursor to the Internet in the 1970s and 1980s, which virtually every business in the U.S. uses today. Not to mention NASA. Same thing with all of the developmental research conducted by colleges and universities such as MIT.

Again, your view of government is simplistic and stupid.

In both those cases, DARPA Net and NASA, it was not the government that created these things or accomplished those feats.

You simply can't accept that government is overhead, can you? That says a lot about you.

PS: The EPA under Obama clearly over stepped their bounds, as their numerous court losses would indicate. I'm rather in favor of strict textualist interpretation of the Constitution, limited the power and scope of government. I suspect this position is also something that baffles you.
 
Your view of government is absurd, vapid, and childish, quite frankly. But this is typical of you misguided, uninformed Tea Party types.

When government builds infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and mass transit systems, they are not "transfer agents" or whatever stupid term that you used earlier. They are creating a strong foundation for an economy to function efficiently. That has intrinsic value in and of itself.

Plus, you don't acknowledge how government has made our society healthier through programs like Medicare, Medicare, medical research, etc. Having a healthier, longer living workforce also has significant intrinsic value to our economy. Fighting pollution via the EPA also helps create a healthier society, which also improves our economy.

And government also plays a massive role in technological innovation. The Dept of Defense created the precursor to the Internet in the 1970s and 1980s, which virtually every business in the U.S. uses today. Not to mention NASA. Same thing with all of the developmental research conducted by colleges and universities such as MIT.

Again, your view of government is simplistic and stupid.

And you are being simplistic and naive if you think the Government doesn't lie and overreach.

IRS stalling conservative 501-C's

FBI submitting false or missing information to FISA judges.

EPA armed better than some countries, and bullying farmers and Ranchers.

Patriot act.

FDA armed better than some countries and bullying businesses.

Government bailing out Wall Street while Americans were losing their homes.

I can go on and on.
 
:lamo

Not following correct procedure.

Holy ****...as if you hadnt **** on your own integrity bad enough already.......

:lamo

The left has not integrity. It's pretty clear when you consider the principals they've expressed:

 
And you are being simplistic and naive if you think the Government doesn't lie and overreach.

IRS stalling conservative 501-C's

FBI submitting false or missing information to FISA judges.

EPA armed better than some countries, and bullying farmers and Ranchers.

Patriot act.

FDA armed better than some countries and bullying businesses.

Government bailing out Wall Street while Americans were losing their homes.

I can go on and on.

Your comments about the EPA and FDA are feeble and asinine as hell.

Funny that you don't think Trump also overreaches. Which is why the mother ****er was impeached.
 
Last edited:
:lamo

Not following correct procedure.

Holy ****...as if you hadnt **** on your own integrity bad enough already.......

:lamo


Then why didn't Barr go after these FBI agents and prosecute them? Because even he knows that their "crimes" are trivial.

The only bias in the FBI was against Hillary Clinton, as this summary of the IG report describes:

The Justice Department inspector general's report debunked President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the FBI’s Russia probe was launched out of anti-Trump bias by FBI leaders. Conversely, it did find anti-Hillary Clinton bias among FBI agents.

Trump claimed for years that the FBI investigation was opened because of anti-Trump bias by FBI leaders, citing text messages sent between former top FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page that criticized him during the 2016 campaign. Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded that neither Strzok nor Page were in a position to start an investigation into Trump’s campaign and concluded that the FBI probe was justified, refuting claims that the probe was opened because of bias by the FBI’s top officials.

Horowitz did find, however, that numerous FBI agents sent anti-Clinton text messages and expressed a desire to investigate the Clinton Foundation, which was at the center of numerous baseless Trump conspiracy theories during the campaign and after the election.

DOJ's IG report debunked Trump’s FBI bias claims — but found anti-Hillary texts from FBI agent | Salon.com

Therefore, you lose again, Deep Stater. As always.
 
LOL. A retired Navy dude is now a Deep Stater who believes the FBI is out to get Trump. Sad. Pathetic.

And most of your feeble comments are also asinine as hell.

Funny that you don't think Trump also overreaches. Which is why the mother ****er was impeached.

Pathetic, is your partisan view on everything that just might not go your way.

Your posts indicate that you seem miserable some times, and vindictive at other times.
 
Pathetic, is your partisan view on everything that just might not go your way.

Your posts indicate that you seem miserable some times, and vindictive at other times.

Do you believe the FBI was out to get Trump? Is a retired Navy dude also a Deep State believer?
 
Psst..... Romney has been known for being a RINO long...... before his presidential run(Rolling eyes)

Man, you just love to make things up!(LOL)

LOL...A RINO was the Republican Presidential nominee in 2012. Got it.

That just shows how weak and ridiculous your position is.
 
You keep calling people racists. That's a slur. A slur typical of leftists applied to people that have the temerity to disagree with them.
It use is designed to silence political opposition and the squash debate of these different opinions, points of view and political positions.
Apparently the left isn't happy when there's opposition or other opinions than they want and what they believe.



In both those cases, DARPA Net and NASA, it was not the government that created these things or accomplished those feats.

You simply can't accept that government is overhead, can you? That says a lot about you.

PS: The EPA under Obama clearly over stepped their bounds, as their numerous court losses would indicate. I'm rather in favor of strict textualist interpretation of the Constitution, limited the power and scope of government. I suspect this position is also something that baffles you.

I don't accept your view that government is "overhead" only because it is an idiotic, simplistic, and asinine position.

Asked and answered, buddy.
 
You keep calling people racists. That's a slur. A slur typical of leftists applied to people that have the temerity to disagree with them.
It use is designed to silence political opposition and the squash debate of these different opinions, points of view and political positions.
Apparently the left isn't happy when there's opposition or other opinions than they want and what they believe.



In both those cases, DARPA Net and NASA, it was not the government that created these things or accomplished those feats.

You simply can't accept that government is overhead, can you? That says a lot about you.

PS: The EPA under Obama clearly over stepped their bounds, as their numerous court losses would indicate. I'm rather in favor of strict textualist interpretation of the Constitution, limited the power and scope of government. I suspect this position is also something that baffles you.

I keep calling the Tea Party racist because that's what they are. Which is why the Tea Party started after Obama's election in 2008. Which is why 72% of Republicans believe Obama is a Muslim born in Kenya. And the previous pictures in this thread also shows the typical angry, bitter white dumb asses who make up the Tea Party and Trump's base.

I can support my position that the Tea Party and Trump voters are racist. On the other hand, you haven't provided diddly squat showing that they are not.
 
The FBI was out to get Trump IMO.

I guess we'll see in the coming months.

Yep, 40 year old and 50 year old conservative law and order types were out to get Trump. Of course, how logical. Most of the folks in the military must also be part of the Deep State.

And Barr's IG report says you are wrong, as I just posted. In fact, many of them were anti-Hillary.

Ignorant, unsophisticated Trump cultist nonsense.
 
Last edited:
I keep calling the Tea Party racist because that's what they are. Which is why the Tea Party started after Obama's election in 2008.

Already cited where this is false. Why are continuing to assert this when it's not true?

Which is why 72% of Republicans believe Obama is a Muslim born in Kenya. And the previous pictures in this thread also shows the typical angry, bitter white dumb asses who make up the Tea Party and Trump's base.

I can support my position that the Tea Party and Trump voters are racist. On the other hand, you haven't provided diddly squat showing that they are not.

Let's see you try.

There may be some that are. I don't think that you can prove that all Trump voters are racist.

Besides, how do you prove a negative?
Prove that leftists aren't racist.

Such 'Gottcha' question are strictly bull****, and as pointed out, serve nothing besides silencing political opposition, silencing differing opinions and positions, and squash debate.
 
Already cited where this is false. Why are continuing to assert this when it's not true?


Let's see you try.

There may be some that are. I don't think that you can prove that all Trump voters are racist.

Besides, how do you prove a negative?
Prove that leftists aren't racist.

Such 'Gottcha' question are strictly bull****, and as pointed out, serve nothing besides silencing political opposition, silencing differing opinions and positions, and squash debate.

Because nobody was paying attention to the Tea Party prior to Obama's election. Nobody gave a rat's ass.

The Tea Party and Trump voters are absolutely racist, as I and others have previously shown. I'm not trying to prove that ALL Trump voters and Republican Tea Party members are racists. However, MOST of them are.
 
Because nobody was paying attention to the Tea Party prior to Obama's election. Nobody gave a rat's ass.

Not disputed. What is disputed was your assertion that 'the Tea Party started after Obama's election in 2008',

So you are moving the goalposts then. Clearly.

The Tea Party and Trump voters are absolutely racist, as I and others have previously shown. I'm not trying to prove that ALL Trump voters and Republican Tea Party members are racists. However, MOST of them are.

You and other have shown a few who might be. You've not show your claim which is that all or even that most are. There's a difference.
 
Please show where anyone in the "Tea Party" stated, inferred or implied they wanted to "destroy the Federal Government".

I'll wait.

Don't confuse liberals with demands for common sense.

S Korea had a much better outcome because rather than relying on government agencies that performed so badly the last pandemic, they out-sourced testing to the private sector.

As Trump is doing.

The Tea Party wants to return to a country of limited federal power restricted by the full Constitution.

As Mark Levin has pointed out, Americans live in a "post Constitutional society" where the Constitution is ignored if not violated on a daily basis.
 
Please show where anyone in the "Tea Party" stated, inferred or implied they wanted to "destroy the Federal Government".

I'll wait.

Look at what Grover Norquist said in post #1. Grover Norquist, well known for his anti-tax hysterics, is a darling of the Tea Party movement.

Norquist was making a joke. Why are you pretending he was serious?

And his anti-tax stance is common sense.

Why should Americans pay a higher and higher percentage of their income to a bloated, corrupt, inefficient federal government?
 
And you've just contradicted yourself. Beefsteak Nazi -- "red on the inside, brown on the outside". Which meant that Nazism and communism were considered significantly different.

No different than calling Green Party members watermelons, because they're green on the outside and red on the inside. Fascists, commies, and greens are all different, but not "significantly". They're all socialists, they're all collectivists, and they're all left-wing.

The Nazis, btw, supported animal rights and environmentalism. Hitler was a big fan of wind power.
 
Please show where anyone in the "Tea Party" stated, inferred or implied they wanted to "destroy the Federal Government".

I'll wait.

No different than calling Green Party members watermelons, because they're green on the outside and red on the inside. Fascists, commies, and greens are all different, but not "significantly". They're all socialists, they're all collectivists, and they're all left-wing.

The Nazis, btw, supported animal rights and environmentalism. Hitler was a big fan of wind power.

Good points.

What does the word "socialist" mean taken from the National Socialist Party?

"Conservative free market.":lol::lol:

You can't make things like that up.
 
Naa. It's an accurate portrayal of the government.



'Life without the government is impossible' ?? That's a laugh.



So we've identified that the government doesn't actually produce anything, that it contracts others to produce things for them, and then, for the government's trouble, adds in their overhead costs.



Other opinions and analysis lead to differing conclusions than those, that FDR extended the great depression needlessly, that nothing he did uplifted anyone, that the war on poverty and the great society programs have netted no significant difference than if they had not been, and that ObamaCare put about as many people out of health insurance as they did give subsidized health insurance, just that those 2 groups of people are different, and hasn't met any of its other goals, including 'bending the cost curve down', so cost control. So, yeah, typical government program. Over promise, under deliver and way above budget. :roll:



Yeah, yeah, sure, sure.

You are welcome to retain your views... we don't agree... Maybe you should relocate to a country with a ****ty government, then let's see what you attitude will be.
 
Americans who understand what freedom is all about and how necessary it it to the peace and prosperity of any civilization, will always resist the initial steps toward ruthless socialist and communist government oppression. We don't need more government with more control and regulation, we need to protect freedom from government bureaucrats to keep them from transforming America into a communist collective dump.

You can't find a place on the planet that is not a form of social society, where you want to bastardize the word "socialistic" that's your choice. You are free to do what regulation allow, no matter where you live.... if you want to do something that regulations don't allow... they have a place for you, and it has more regulations than you'd care to deal with and it has a fence and bars on the small space allotment they will certainly give to you, rent free!!!! and you will stay there until "they" tell you, that you can leave.


Republican Conservatives are always talking about freedom, yet they are trapped and contained in the delusions of conservatism, and gerrymandered within their cult like idology, and you have the audacity to speak about freedom, when you willingly devoted yourself to the small minded containment of Conservatism, to the extent you added the word "very" onto it.
 
You are welcome to retain your views... we don't agree... Maybe you should relocate to a country with a ****ty government, then let's see what you attitude will be.

Fair enough. You are welcome to retain your views. Maybe you should relocate Venezuela? (The last attempt at socialism).
 
Did the FBI knowingly falsify FISA warrants using data they KNEW was fabricated, KNEW had not been properly vetted, KNEW could not be properly vetted, and misrepresented in the warrant as having been properly vetted? Did the FBI knowingly use a bull**** dossier that was bought and paid for by an opposition political party? Is there evidence that sr members of the FBI by their own admission conspired to overthrow the results of a presidential election?

See...you know the FBI did ALL those things and more...and your only defense is "buh buh but...TRUUUUMMMPPPPPP!!!" and you KNOW all you are doing is ****ting on your own credibility when you do so...but there you are...doing it anyway.

B-B-B-B-But the FBI! :roll:
Did criminal Don misuse charity funds and have to pay up? CHECK! Did criminal Don defraud the people at Trump U and have to pay up? CHECK!
There's also the many cases he has been able turn into sieges until the other side runs out of money, and the destroying of businesses he has refused to pay. He's a great guy!
I'll take the character of the FBI over the despicable narcissist. I hear the SDNY has been looking into insurance and tax fraud. Gee, I wonder if there could be any truth to that?
 
You can't find a place on the planet that is not a form of social society, where you want to bastardize the word "socialistic" that's your choice. You are free to do what regulation allow, no matter where you live.... if you want to do something that regulations don't allow... they have a place for you, and it has more regulations than you'd care to deal with and it has a fence and bars on the small space allotment they will certainly give to you, rent free!!!! and you will stay there until "they" tell you, that you can leave.
Republican Conservatives are always talking about freedom, yet they are trapped and contained in the delusions of conservatism, and gerrymandered within their cult like idology, and you have the audacity to speak about freedom, when you willingly devoted yourself to the small minded containment of Conservatism, to the extent you added the word "very" onto it.

You may think socialism is great but you will never convince anyone of that who remembers the human suffering under brutal communist and socialist dictators around the world during the last century of human civilization on earth.
 
Back
Top Bottom