• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

You can’t ban human nature

Imagine agreeing that there's nothing that can be done to prevent kids from killing themselves.
There is but it's talk to them having a connection interacting with them. When they trust you they won't talk about these sorts of thing.
My guess is the average gun owner doesn't have kids anymore.
I'm betting there's a lot more average gun owners that have kids then that don't have kids the ones that don't have kids probably have grandkids.

Maybe they just know their children very well need to worry about this sort of thing.
 
Over 100 years ago, progressives convinced the country that banning alcohol would solve the problem of drunkenness. Needless to say, it became one of the biggest policy failures in U.S. history. Today, they want to ban guns - just like they once banned alcohol. Does anybody really think the results would be any different?

Prohibition didn’t stop drinking. It created black markets, built up organized crime, and turned millions of ordinary Americans into criminals. Now, with guns, they think a ban will stop violence - or “gun violence,” as they put it. But just like booze, the demand won’t vanish, it’ll just go underground.

And let’s not pretend that banning one specific weapon means a murderer suddenly decides not to murder. The intent stays, while the method shifts to whatever it takes to fulfill the intent.
Many countries with firearms have far less firearm violence than the USA because they have gun CONTROL not gun bans.
 
When a dog steps on a rifle in the back seat with one in the chamber, and kills the guy in the passenger seat, it's the dumbasses right.
Human nature is to be foolish, selfish, and thoughtless.
 
I could do this too say that you love people dying and so forth but you're only doing that because you're stuck in a corner.

Please don't ever stop what you're doing. Make everyone hate you so they vote against you out of spite that's the best thing you could do for gun owners thank you for your service.

Just a word to the wise this is how you turn the culture against you again thank you.
You live in a bubble
 
I was pointing out that it's rare even if I was to believe you're absolute lie that it happened every day.

Over a year it's 365 out of 100 million.
Huh? If something everyday, it is not rare. I don’t know what the **** you are talking about. Do you know what rare means
 
Imagine agreeing that there's nothing that can be done to prevent kids from killing themselves.

My guess is the average gun owner doesn't have kids anymore.
Rather than guessing, maybe actually read.

Or don't and just keep saying stupid shit like you usually do. Here, let me play your game: car crashed into a fire hydrant? Gotta ban fire hydrants or else nothing can be done to prevent collisions with fire hydrants!
 
Back
Top Bottom