• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Yes, I believe in the IMMACULATE CONCEPTION!

Sounds like a "Snipe" hunt.


That's right. I never found one, so the name didn't sink in as something worth remembering. That and 55 yrs to forget. Thanks for the correction.
 
That's right. I never found one, so the name didn't sink in as something worth remembering. That and 55 yrs to forget. Thanks for the correction.
Well, did you have a lit candle in front of your bag.
 
How to hunt Snarks:

“They sought it with thimbles, they sought it with care;
They pursued it with forks and hope;
They threatened its life with a railway-share;
They charmed it with smiles and soap.”



by Lewis Carroll :)
 
No - the "original sin" is something different altother.
But being no theologian I feel unable to explain the idiotic concept of the "original sin".
In German it is the "Erbsünde" - and even as a Catholic child I declared that "Erbsünde" an unfair and idiotic nonsense.
Have you also written your own version of the bible? When I attended catholic school they beat original sin into you if you weren't born with it.
 
With a ruler, as I recall. Those nuns could be vicious.
Ruler, pointer, whatever was handy. With that said, the catholic education I received from grade one to the eighth grade was excellent. I had more subjects in grade school that high schoolers have today.
 
Original sin posits that there was some perfect super people who existed in the far far distant past until a certain fruit was eaten. (Sounds like a certain ubermenschen claim) Utter hogwash
 
What fundies like to do is skip steps in their premises. The kalam cosmological argument is a great example of skipping steps. They jump from a very vague and general point which they dont have much evidence for to begin with then make a mad dash towards their preferred conclusion. Its how you can tell someone has a pre supposed conclusion.
 
I've never understood the purpose of the immaculate conception = born without sin (lust)?

It stems from a theological problem that seeks to answer how Jesus could have been sinless, i.e. not possess original sin, having been born of a human mother. Instead of solving it, they just shifted the problem from Jesus to Mary and called it a miracle that Mary was conceived without original sin.
 
Ruler, pointer, whatever was handy. With that said, the catholic education I received from grade one to the eighth grade was excellent. I had more subjects in grade school that high schoolers have today.


I didn't attend a catholic school. I did take catechism, though didn't quite complete. It felt hypocritical, so totally wrong, to accept a deal I couldn't buy into.
 
I didn't attend a catholic school. I did take catechism, though didn't quite complete. It felt hypocritical, so totally wrong, to accept a deal I couldn't buy into.
I had the whole treatment and as I got older by around the fifth grade I couldn't swallow the fantasy any longer so I questioned everything and ended up flunking religion. Boo hoo.
 
It stems from a theological problem that seeks to answer how Jesus could have been sinless, i.e. not possess original sin, having been born of a human mother. Instead of solving it, they just shifted the problem from Jesus to Mary and called it a miracle that Mary was conceived without original sin.

Clever, isn't it!
But it was a bit too clever, so that most people misunderstood the whole thing and thought it would mean: "No sex - please!".
Which is beside the point.
Joachim and Anna were free to enjoy any sex they wanted - and still did not pass on that mysterious "original sin" onto Mary.
 
I had the whole treatment and as I got older by around the fifth grade I couldn't swallow the fantasy any longer so I questioned everything and ended up flunking religion. Boo hoo.


My mom was very religious, personally, but never outwards. Dad, no way. My now ex wife was and is spiritual, no way a god-hugger or religious. I'm agnostic, but only because of the science. Still, we raised our son as he wished, so he did both go to a Lutheran school, public school, then a Catholic (private) school and grad from a public HS. We had no problem with him being baptized Lutheran, as he wished, when he was maybe 8 yrs old because his best friend, to this day, at the same school was Lutheran. A couple yrs later he was actually reading the Bible and I asked him what he thought. He said the verse he read made no sense, nor could I make sense of it, so he hasn't been convinced since. Oh well.
 
My mom was very religious, personally, but never outwards. Dad, no way. My now ex wife was and is spiritual, no way a god-hugger or religious. I'm agnostic, but only because of the science. Still, we raised our son as he wished, so he did both go to a Lutheran school, public school, then a Catholic (private) school and grad from a public HS. We had no problem with him being baptized Lutheran, as he wished, when he was maybe 8 yrs old because his best friend, to this day, at the same school was Lutheran. A couple yrs later he was actually reading the Bible and I asked him what he thought. He said the verse he read made no sense, nor could I make sense of it, so he hasn't been convinced since. Oh well.
My mother became a nun in her later years.
 
What fundies like to do is skip steps in their premises. The kalam cosmological argument is a great example of skipping steps. They jump from a very vague and general point which they dont have much evidence for to begin with then make a mad dash towards their preferred conclusion. Its how you can tell someone has a pre supposed conclusion.


I find it quite amusing that the god is always exempt from the syllogism.
 
With a ruler, as I recall. Those nuns could be vicious.

Although they were formidable, I never experienced unkindness, much less viciousness. Neither did my little sisters, not even the "12-year girl."
 
I hope that it has now become clear that the idea of the "immaculate conception" has got nothing to do with the idea of the virgin birth.
 
I hope that it has now become clear that the idea of the "immaculate conception" has got nothing to do with the idea of the virgin birth.
After the question of what does “original sin”mean, the natural followup question is what’s a human supposed to do about it?
 
Back
Top Bottom