• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wyoming Bill Would Nullify Obama Gun Control, Jail Feds.....

Unless there really are tigers.

DiFi's bill qualifies. I see it as unconstitutional, and I'm not the only one.

Shhhhh, stop paying attention to that, didn't you hear that no one is after your guns? I know its hard to tell given their proposals, but they swear they mean it.

Just like the Australians were only going after AWBs (semi auto rifles), then they took all handguns, now they want the bolt actions too.
 
what national disaster are your referring to?
The National Disaster which would shake the foundations of America should armed Federal Forces invade Wyoming and engage it's state and local governments, police, National Guard and private citizens in a major shootout_

But like I said, I don't believe the Feds would actually do this for much the same reason that the LA Rodney King Riots were permitted to continue uninterrupted by Police and National Guard_

The City of Los Angelos didn't want the bad publicity that aggressive police action would have brought on in much the same way as what Washington DC would like to avoid in a rebellious state_

Of course the people of Wyoming wouldn't bring on near as much bad publicity from the main stream media as the Los Angelos rioters would have demanded because of their special minority status_
 

The funny part is where you think state police would actually engage federal agents or military personnel.

I love your conspiracy theory about the LA riots being "permitted to continue." I'd ask you to show some evidence for this, but we both know your answer would just be some cop out about how I need to go educate myself.
 

Californians can't shoot. (Sorry CalGun)
 
Californians can't shoot. (Sorry CalGun)

most of the good shots left the state when it started harassing honest people. USA shooting moved the olympic trials out of california because the guns used in the olympic rapid fire event are banned as assault weapons in California. Colorado and George now host the trials
 

That would be funny if it werent so sad.
 
i didn't know about that natural disaster
would you please provide a link
a link please - no tin foil


Link? You need a link for what is clearly seen by people paying attention? Or is it that you, like other liberals, and progressives can't look at what is going on until after it is put into action? Either way, your defense, and willing blindness of the current administration is duly noted.
 
The funny part is where you think state police would actually engage federal agents or military personnel.
Completely off the mark as to what I stated Deuce_

If you had took the time to check the preceding posts you would have found that I was simply responding to someone else who suggested an aggressive Federal response in Wyoming, to which I replied that I didn't believe this was likely to happen_

Next time, research before you attack Deuce__Liberals trying to play "GOTCHA!" is such an annoyance_

I love your conspiracy theory about the LA riots being "permitted to continue." I'd ask you to show some evidence for this, but we both know your answer would just be some cop out about how I need to go educate myself.
I recall seeing videos of armed Korean shop owners defending their businesses while the police were no where in sight and even heard reports of LAPD withdrawing and of the city burning as firefighters were being attacked by rioters for lack of police protection_


IMO, the Rodney King beating was a crime and the cops responsible should have been convicted but still yet the riot was aloud to get way out of hand for whatever reason_

I see no reason to discuss the 1992 LA Riot any further_

I was 5 years old at the time and draw my conclusions from what I've read, videos and common sense, 20 years after the fact_
 
Last edited:

your surmise that the rioters were "permitted" to riot because they were not stopped by government agents is as absurd as pretending terrorists are "permitted" to create havoc because they were not caught by federal agents before they perpetrated their harm
 
Actually, "permitted" may have been a less accurate choice of words on my part than "the authorities were not aggressive enough to effectively stop it"_

Which could be construed as "permitted" if it was a conscious decision by those in charge_
 
Actually, "permitted" may have been a less accurate choice of words on my part than "the authorities were not aggressive enough to effectively stop it"_

Which could be construed as "permitted" if it was a conscious decision by those in charge_

kind of like 'permitting' crime when we are not active enough to prevent it
 
kind of like 'permitting' crime when we are not active enough to prevent it
Not "prevent" a crime but actually stop a crime when it is being commited right in front of those whose job it is_

Of course law enforcment officers must be trusted to use what ever force is necessary to accomplish this, limited only by their professional judgement with no personal biases, emotions or preconceived notions_

I never intended to make the LA Riot a major issue__What happened, did you guys get tired of the OP subject?
 

I love it! especially the part about arresting federal agents who try to infringe on the Second Amendment.

Awesome... "Come here to take guns and your ass is in a jail cell."

Good for Wyoming.

What a lot of these urban progressive tyrants don't understand is that guns not only protect us from tyranny but also put food on the table in rural areas. What people don't understand is that 90% of the country is rural. People still live off the land in some places - It's 50 miles to the closest store and they go maybe once a month for supplies. Wyoming is certainly one of those states where people live that way.

I'm glad predominately rural states are telling the city folk with their progressive ideas about gun bans to go f themselves.
 
focusing on the absurdity of your statement that our government "permits" such crimes
if i recall, you were the one who introduced the koreatown riots into this conversation
 

Well said. Instead of harassing law abiding citizens with these nonsensical gun control proposals, why don't libs just cut to the chase and make murder illegal? :roll:
 
Well said. Instead of harassing law abiding citizens with these nonsensical gun control proposals, why don't libs just cut to the chase and make murder illegal? :roll:

Progressivism is a goofy ass philosophy.

Attack the gangs? NOOOOO that would be "racist" no their solution is to attack law abiding citizens who harm no one.

Teaching kids they're all #1 and the second they realize they're not or are teased they go steal guns and shoot the school up because they can't deal with the fact they're not #1.

Funny how I grew up perfectly fine, I got my fair share of crap but I never even thought about pulling a gun or even killing anyone. Sure I got into plenty of fights but that's where it ended. Ironically the guys that gave me the most crap turned out to be some of my best friends later in life. Now these days kids go shooting up schools just because their feelings get hurt and progressiveism is responsible for that.

I don't see how a guy like me is responsible for some idiot across the country that shot a school up just because he was bullied, nor am I responsible for the idiot gangbanger that kills an innocent person to just show he/she is down for the gang, or the idiot who has an IQ of 75 and gets all frustrated over a meaningless argument and kills someone to prove something.

Progressives are attacking the wrong crowed - they know this - they know it's their voting base that are committing all these gun crimes but they have no desire to stop them because that would prevent tragedies that could be exploited for personal gain.

To a progressive when a gangbanger shoots another gangbanger on the West Side of Chicago it's not the gangbangers fault - no it's the legal gun owner living in Montana. Progressives are incapable of taking responsibility so they blame blame and blame.

It's not my fault its your fault - it's not your fault it's my fault..

Flippin insanity!
 
Well said. Instead of harassing law abiding citizens with these nonsensical gun control proposals, why don't libs just cut to the chase and make murder illegal? :roll:
Now there's a novel idea_

I'm surprised I didn't think of it myself_
 

Agreed. Misdirected proposed solutions do seem to be the defining characteristic of the progressives. Their intellectual gyrations to avoid reality can be really awesome to watch, particularly if you are into slapstick humor.
 
Agreed. Misdirected proposed solutions do seem to be the defining characteristic of the progressives. Their intellectual gyrations to avoid reality can be really awesome to watch, particularly if you are into slapstick humor.

It's amazing how people don't see it. Progressive policies are responsible for all of this mess and then they come swooping in with solutions that generally limit civil liberties and every progressive claps their hands because they get a free Obama phone or free lifestyle in general but don't see the simple fact that it was progressive policies that put them into a position to need a free Obama phone or a tax payer funded lifestyle.

They create a mess just so they can come in and promise to clean it up - however they won't and don't.

It's amazing how stupid the general public actually is.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…