Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
http://www.therightscoop.com/report-clinton-asked-for-more-security-in-benghazi-obama-said-no/ According to Ed Klein yesterday on Wilkow, the legal counsel of Hillary Clinton told him that she had actually ordered more security in Benghazi before the attack, however Obama turned it down. In fact he also reports that Bill Clinton wants her to release proof of this to protect herself even though it would likely cost Obama the election.
|
It IS stunning! I've lost track though. Is this the 26th or 27th Benghazi thread in the Election 2012 forum?
It IS stunning! I've lost track though. Is this the 26th or 27th Benghazi thread in the Election 2012 forum?
You'd prefer the four dead Americans didn't become an election issue?
You'd prefer the four dead Americans didn't become an election issue?
You tell 'em.
We need to stop Obama before he's responsible for 4000 dead Americans.
You tell 'em.
We need to stop Obama before he's responsible for 4000 dead Americans.
I would prefer that partisan hacks didn't cheapen their deaths by trying to turn them into a vile political stunt.
The Leftists are certainly trying to highjack this thread.
related issues should be discussed together. when someone brings up the war in iraq being illegal, the right is always quick to bring up libya, so i don't see the distinction when the shoe is on the other foot.
Well at least you admit it.
http://www.therightscoop.com/report-clinton-asked-for-more-security-in-benghazi-obama-said-no/
According to Ed Klein yesterday on Wilkow, the legal counsel of Hillary Clinton told him that she had actually ordered more security in Benghazi before the attack, however Obama turned it down.
In fact he also reports that Bill Clinton wants her to release proof of this to protect herself even though it would likely cost Obama the election.
EXAMINER- Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.
The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.
Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.
Klein explained that everyone knew what was happening in Benghazi from the CIA to the National Security Agency and that there’s intelligence cables that have not been released.
Wilkow asked, “If everybody knew this including the White House, who would have given the order to go in and save the ambassador?”
Klein, “The President…he should have given the order to use the rapid reaction force…”
Wilkow, “Not Petraeus?”
Klein, “Well it has to come from the president.”
Not only does this reflect very poorly on the Obama administration, but also on the propaganda media that has been trying to protect him every since this happened on the night of 9/11.
This is likely one of the biggest scandals this country has ever seen and it’s been hidden by the Obama administration and the media.
And we hanged Richard Nixon to dry, because of "little old" Watergate???? Dear Lord!!!!! What's happening here????
I would prefer that partisan hacks didn't cheapen their deaths by trying to turn them into a vile political stunt.
related issues should be discussed together. when someone brings up the war in iraq being illegal, the right is always quick to bring up libya, so i don't see the distinction when the shoe is on the other foot.
You tell 'em.
We need to stop Obama before he's responsible for 4000 dead Americans.
The war in Iraq has nothing to do with Benghazi. Perhaps we will learn that there are similarities to "Iran-gate" (I am referring to guns-brokering here), but comparing a war (authorized by Congress) to the assassination of a United States ambassador on home soil and the apparent security failures isn't going to work.
There won't be much talk about it after election day my right wing friend.
The Leftists are certainly trying to highjack this thread.
I wouldn't bet on that. I am going to be every bit as interested after election day as I am now. And I don't think I'm alone.
Well....when you talk about 4 dead....vs....the hundreds/thousands of dead as a result of GWB.....it puts it all into perspective.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?