• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Wow this is stunning!!!!!! [W:188]

You and your conspiracy theories crack me up DD.....So anyone who disagrees with you is spineless and brainless.......You never cease to amaze me.

No....but Cheney/Rumsfield and Bush KNEW that they were manipulating public fear and military intelligence in order to "justify" invading Iraq. It was something that Cheney and Rumsfield had tried to do for decades. They tried to get H.W. Bush to do it, but he was smart enough not to engage them in their actions. Fast forward to 2001 when we had a complete idiot in the whitehouse that they could get to push their agenda. Add in brainless Republicans that will follow like sheep and a bunch of spinless democrats who are afraid of their own shadow that they can't stand up for their convictions and what is right....and we get a decade long war, thousands of dead Americans.....and for what? Lies. American soldiers should never be USED in this way. Our soldiers are not pawns to be played in a military game.
 
So let's recap-
Questions arising from multiple sources about the justifications to launch a war of choice in Iraq leading to thousands of dead soldiers is just some conspiratorial leftist 'hate the US' ramblings.

Unsubstantiated claims made by partisan right wing bloggers are to be taken as if Moses himself delivered them. :roll:

I understand the key to this is the right wing curmudgeon insistence that all main stream media outlets are leftist and unreliable while ANY right wing blogger, no matter how many times wrong, is gospel.

Only thing stunning about this is the silence after this fizzled BEFORE the election and no new bombshells after. To hear the radical right speak there are thousands of right leaning people in the military, state dept, justice dept who could blow this wide open....

and yet all there is is the sound of silence-

oh with the usual poop flingers like McCain and right wing bloggers try to be a harpie chorus...

more pitiful than stunning.

Now what is stunning is many of the right wing ranters in this thread were soooo sure Catholics, Hispanics, even blacks were solidly in the Willard corner due to social issues.

I'd say that they were so stunningly wrong it gives us excellent insight into how reliable the poop they drag in here truly is... :peace
 
So let's recap-
Questions arising from multiple sources about the justifications to launch a war of choice in Iraq leading to thousands of dead soldiers is just some conspiratorial leftist 'hate the US' ramblings.

Unsubstantiated claims made by partisan right wing bloggers are to be taken as if Moses himself delivered them. :roll:

I understand the key to this is the right wing curmudgeon insistence that all main stream media outlets are leftist and unreliable while ANY right wing blogger, no matter how many times wrong, is gospel.

Only thing stunning about this is the silence after this fizzled BEFORE the election and no new bombshells after. To hear the radical right speak there are thousands of right leaning people in the military, state dept, justice dept who could blow this wide open....

and yet all there is is the sound of silence-

oh with the usual poop flingers like McCain and right wing bloggers try to be a harpie chorus...

more pitiful than stunning.

Now what is stunning is many of the right wing ranters in this thread were soooo sure Catholics, Hispanics, even blacks were solidly in the Willard corner due to social issues.

I'd say that they were so stunningly wrong it gives us excellent insight into how reliable the poop they drag in here truly is... :peace



Sound of Silence? Come again? You do know Lindsey Graham Was a Jag Officer.....Correct? Yeah.....so much for the Simon and Garfunkel effect. Perhaps Obama can play like Joseph and his Techno-DreamColors so ya can follows the pretty lights. Next time!
 
AdamT let me handle this. Look Navy Pride or Navel or whatever. If you are going to make a claim, then you need a credible source. Linking to a 3rd party porn site or in this case dead link isn't making your claim credible. So,present a credible source so we all can take a look. We all know you think Obama is a.....wait what is it you call him? "Muslim" right? No that is not it. "Socialist" right? No...I know that not right. "Ni-----" I know that can't be it. Oh its President of the United States. That is it. So yea, credible source. Try that first.

There are certainly more credible sources in this "Benghazigate" thing than there was in Watergate, which relied on an unknown person at the time called "Deepthroat". In Benghazigate" you have people lying everywhere, including the POTUS.
 
No....but Cheney/Rumsfield and Bush KNEW that they were manipulating public fear and military intelligence in order to "justify" invading Iraq. It was something that Cheney and Rumsfield had tried to do for decades. They tried to get H.W. Bush to do it, but he was smart enough not to engage them in their actions. Fast forward to 2001 when we had a complete idiot in the whitehouse that they could get to push their agenda. Add in brainless Republicans that will follow like sheep and a bunch of spinless democrats who are afraid of their own shadow that they can't stand up for their convictions and what is right....and we get a decade long war, thousands of dead Americans.....and for what? Lies. American soldiers should never be USED in this way. Our soldiers are not pawns to be played in a military game.

Isn't some sort of evidence required before you make these hallucinogenic claims?
 
When Fox News stops it's 24 hour Benghazi fabrication stories and replaces them with Rev Wright and Obama's grandma conspired and orchestrated the attack in Benghazi.

It's fun to watch you libs rush to Obama's defense on this.

You may not think Obama should be impeached for this, but the rest of the country does.
 
It's fun to watch you libs rush to Obama's defense on this.

You may not think Obama should be impeached for this, but the rest of the country does.

Doesn't work. I have my poe repellant on.
 
According to Ed Klein yesterday on Wilkow, the legal counsel of Hillary Clinton told him that she had actually ordered more security in Benghazi before the attack, however Obama turned it down.
In fact he also reports that Bill Clinton wants her to release proof of this to protect herself even though it would likely cost Obama the election.

Sounds like more cowbell to me!

PS - All of those rainbow fonts were very pretty, though.
 
It's fun to watch you libs rush to Obama's defense on this.

You may not think Obama should be impeached for this, but the rest of the country does.

Wait, impeachment? What did he do that was unconstitutional?

Or are you throwing around more words you don't know the definition of again?
 
It's fun to watch you libs rush to Obama's defense on this.

You may not think Obama should be impeached for this, but the rest of the country does.

The only people who want Obama impeached over this are the ones who bought the Fox News "exclusive" stories at face value despite the source being completely anonymous. Those people already wanted Obama impeached for the high crime of being a Democrat.

You aren't as mainstream as you think you are.
 
Isn't some sort of evidence required before you make these hallucinogenic claims?

I liked this part best:

Our soldiers are not pawns to be played in a military game.

Yeah, ok, war (or, in this case, diplomacy and the CIA) is a game. Like that's not disconnected.
 
Last edited:
Isn't some sort of evidence required before you make these hallucinogenic claims?
There is a ton of evidence out there.....but it requires that you study a little bit of history. Go back and read up. It is well known that Rumsfield and Cheney BOTH wanted to invade Iraq dating back to the late eightiest/early 90's. It is also widely known that H.W. Bush refused to go along with their requests. A quick place to learn a little, if you wanna take the time to educate yourself....google Rumsfields war.....this is a good place to start and you can take it further if you want to follow up on some of the information.
 
It's fun to watch you libs rush to Obama's defense on this.

You may not think Obama should be impeached for this, but the rest of the country does.

Actually, you may think Obama should be impeached for this.... but very few others do....
 
Sounds like more cowbell to me!

PS - All of those rainbow fonts were very pretty, though.

My favorite critique of a song - "Needs more cowbell". LOL.
 
Back
Top Bottom