First, I'll give you just a little credit for actually making an effort. Unfortunately, you fell fat short. I don't think you proved any lies. For one thing, you need to provide actual evidence, not just write a few word phrase.
Your first claim is about AOC asserting there was voter suppression in Michigan. She did make that claim. What you didn't show is that it's a lie.
For example, she said, "“Right there, in Ann Arbor, where we had that rally, those kids were waiting three hours in line to vote in Michigan," she explained." Do you have proof there weren't such long lines reducing voting?
Your second item is that she said border agents were taking selfies. What I saw was one claim that one agent had tried to sneak a mocking selfie. Do you have proof that's a lie? All of your statements seem to be hyped claims on far-right media, not credible.
Your final claim misrepresents the issue. She (and another woman with her) said they heard one immigrant in custody tell them that agents had told them 'if you're thirsty, drink from the toilet'. Do you have proof that's a lie that an immigrant told them that? Given the culture of abuse there, it's highly plausible.
Those right-wing sources are the liars. For example, on that same visit, they claimed that AOC was 'faking tears next to a parking lot'. Snopes debunked the story as false.
A picture taken in 2018 captured Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, before she was elected to the U.S. House, protesting a migrant-detention camp.
www.snopes.com
Bernie's statement wasn't a lie. You could accuse him of overstating his history of supporting gay marriage, but when he said he wasn't evolving on gay marriage, he wasn't. He did have a better history than his opponent on the issue.
No, he didn't lie about healthcare cost. "Americans spend nearly twice as much on health care as other wealthy countries"
The United States spends nearly twice as much on health care as its wealthy peers, but its residents have the shortest life spans and highest infant mortality rates, a new study finds.
money.cnn.com
I won't bother with your senior income since you provided no specifics.
Your strongest claim is Rony Wyden's; politifact agrees with you it's false. But I disagree with Politifact. They used a very narrow interpretation. You do understand that Republicans voted against those programs? In my opinion Republicans are very much plotting to take away as much of those programs as they can get away with. Of course they don't advertise the plotting.
Your second Wyden claim was rated "mostly true" by Politifact. At least you admit you couldn't find any more.
You don't give any specifics on Whitehouse and chemicals, but the gist as so often is that he was correctly raising an issue, but didn't get all the details right. As Politifact (who it appears you searched for your list) said, "
...none of this analysis undercuts Whitehouse’s basic argument that the 1976 law isn’t protecting the public and it needs an overhaul.
While many companies have agreed to restrictions under EPA pressure, the overall regulatory environment is extremely lax. Regulators don’t know the toxicity of many chemicals in the marketplace."
I will give you one exaggeration. Whitehouse did say Ryan would eliminate Medicare, when he meant it would eliminate the current program and replace it with a smaller one, which was correct.
You don't offer any specifics on the last two issues.
So, you did pretty badly, at worst finding a couple cases where statements were largely right but exaggerated or wrong in details, and usually just wrong.
www.wola.org