It very much depends on what each side is fighting for.
Understandable. I'm meaning if there was ever a revolution/rebellion against an increasingly tyrannical government. If it were something like American terrorists attacking government buildings/whatever, it'd make sense for troops to combat them.
If I were a soldier I wouldn't kill fellow Americans if they were fighting against an increasingly tyrannical government. I'd join them if those leaders think they'd pit me against our own.
Have you been thinking of joining a militia?
Not sure what you mean.
Why would there be a revolution? Providing Health care for poor people, would that be a good reason for you to start shooting fellow americans?
Are you so against this rightwing idea, Obamacare, that you would go to war to prevent it?
You do know it was created by the most rightwing think tank in America, dont you?
This thread topic stems from the conversations gathered in the thread at the bottom of this post.
Basically it's about civillians taking up arms against the government should the government start becoming tyrannical.
Somewhere along the way in that thread, it was mentiond that the U.S. military could squash any sort of rebellion. Mow them down.
So I gots a question. If God forbid you're a soldier and you're ever ordered by your leaders to shoot fellow Americans, would you?
Likewise, if you were a soldier, or even if you're a civillians, if you were given that sort of order as a soldier, what would you do?
I'm asking this question 'cause I want to have some sense of security, knowing that our American soldiers won't be turned against us.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gun-control/138913-guns-revolution-not-real-real.html#post1061002943
WASHINGTON — Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. asserted on Monday that it is lawful for the government to kill American citizens if officials deem them to be operational leaders of Al Qaeda who are planning attacks on the United States and if capturing them alive is not feasible.
H. R. 1540—265
required by subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United
States shall submit to Congress an assessment by the Comptroller
General of the report, including a determination whether or not
the report complies with applicable best practices.
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism
SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF
THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS
PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY
FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Congress affirms that the authority of the
President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to
the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40;
50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces
of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection
(b)) pending disposition under the law of war.
(b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under this section
is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided
the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001,
or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported
al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged
in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,
including any person who has committed a belligerent act or
has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy
forces.
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—The disposition of a
person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may
include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until
the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for
Use of Military Force.
(2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States
Code (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009
(title XVIII of Public Law 111–84)).
(3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent
tribunal having lawful jurisdiction.
(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person’s country
of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.
(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section is intended to limit
or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the
Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(e) AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this section shall be construed
to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of
United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States,
or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United
States.
(f) REQUIREMENT FOR BRIEFINGS OF CONGRESS.—The Secretary
of Defense shall regularly brief Congress regarding the application
of the authority described in this section, including the organizations,
entities, and individuals considered to be ‘‘covered persons’’
for purposes of subsection (b)(2).
Firing on civs is not a lawful order.
It is if martial law has been declared, which is the only time the US military should be involved in a domestic matter. Posse Comitatus.
This thread topic stems from the conversations gathered in the thread at the bottom of this post.
Basically it's about civillians taking up arms against the government should the government start becoming tyrannical.
Somewhere along the way in that thread, it was mentiond that the U.S. military could squash any sort of rebellion. Mow them down.
So I gots a question. If God forbid you're a soldier and you're ever ordered by your leaders to shoot fellow Americans, would you?
Likewise, if you were a soldier, or even if you're a civillians, if you were given that sort of order as a soldier, what would you do?
I'm asking this question 'cause I want to have some sense of security, knowing that our American soldiers won't be turned against us.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gun-control/138913-guns-revolution-not-real-real.html#post1061002943
Marial law does not render firing on a civilian a legal order. If someone is trying to shoot me, no one needs to tell me to engage.
Yes, it does indeed, that's exactly what it means. Never heard of the Civil War?
This thread topic stems from the conversations gathered in the thread at the bottom of this post.
Basically it's about civillians taking up arms against the government should the government start becoming tyrannical.
Somewhere along the way in that thread, it was mentiond that the U.S. military could squash any sort of rebellion. Mow them down.
So I gots a question. If God forbid you're a soldier and you're ever ordered by your leaders to shoot fellow Americans, would you?
Likewise, if you were a soldier, or even if you're a civillians, if you were given that sort of order as a soldier, what would you do?
I'm asking this question 'cause I want to have some sense of security, knowing that our American soldiers won't be turned against us.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gun-control/138913-guns-revolution-not-real-real.html#post1061002943
Why would there be a revolution? Providing Health care for poor people, would that be a good reason for you to start shooting fellow americans?
Are you so against this rightwing idea, Obamacare, that you would go to war to prevent it?
You do know it was created by the most rightwing think tank in America, dont you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?