If it was legal .....
If a business -- any business -- decided to put a sign in their window saying "No [insert any race here] Allowed", would you still patronize that business?
Anonymous poll.
Nope. Most wouldn't, but that's still not good enough reason to allow said discrimination, as many libertarians/conservatives would argue.
I don't think you'd find many people these days who would.
That's what I'm assuming. A business would never survive.
If it was legal .....
If a business -- any business -- decided to put a sign in their window saying "No [insert any race here] Allowed", would you still patronize that business?
Anonymous poll.
There are places it does - today. It's done informally.
But the business being able to do it at all is a threat to society because the damage done to society by the act is undeniable. Just one business doing so, openly or otherwise, represents a threat to the targeted race collectively when that race is a minority.
There is no threat when that business doesn't have the support of the vast majority of America.
Look at the Westboro creeps -- they have zero traction because 99% of people don't believe in what they say or do.
I would not assume that's true as there are many people who would jump at the chance to support such a business.
Who? ...
I would not assume that's true as there are many people who would jump at the chance to support such a business.
That's what I'm assuming. A business would never survive.
Racists. You don't think they exist?
To add to my previous post, most of those people would be libertarians.
In very small numbers, of course. There always will be people who hate whites, blacks, natives, etc.
Hating whites is not racism
If it was legal .....
If a business -- any business -- decided to put a sign in their window saying "No [insert any race here] Allowed", would you still patronize that business?
Anonymous poll.
Oh, stop it right now. Jeez.
Hating whites is not racism, it's merely racial bigotry. Racism is a social construct and minorities have no power to institute nor perpetuate majority privilege for themselves; therefore, a black hating whites is of no threat to whites collectively. Without a collective threat, it's an individual act alone and not an ism.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?