Why even bring up homosexuality in a thread about pedophiles?
Already listed.
Crime.
Ah, so you are defining homosexual purely in behavioural terms. The incidence of homosexual behavior is far higher than the incidence of exclusive homosexual attraction. I know men who identify as heterosexual and are married with children who would be classified as "homosexual" under your definition. It would be intellectually dishonest to use self reporting stats that use a different definition of homosexual to argue a higher prevalence of homosexual child molesters. There is no way to discern how many people are homosexual under your definition.
Oddly enough, opportunist offenders who molest both boys and girls would also meet you definition.
It can also be perfectly legal, as it seems to have been in Delaware in 1895, where according to the New York Times the age of consent seems to have been 7.
Yeah but what causes the duress? Is it inherent or largely produced by a society so opposed to them that they can't even tell a therapist without fear of being reported? I can imagine that being attracted to little kids would by itself cause dysfunction,.but with so much hostility, it's probably impossible to know
The Family Research Council is a far-right anti -gay hate group.
So, like the armed robber who buys a gun on the street, they would actually have a weapon back.
The next step is simply to lock them up for good in order to protect their victims.
The same thing works for haters.
Where?
There is no real medical cure for pedophilia. I'll go by a what a common man in a jury would believe a young child, per-pubrety, would be. Just to be safe, 12 and under.
Pedophiles continue to rape children at a rate up to 50 percent---about the fatality rate of Ebola viruses. Imprisonment and psychotherapy are failed therapies. The only sure way to treat pedophila "disorders-HA" is by capital punishment.
Pessimism About Pedophilia - Harvard Health Publications
Theives should do hard time on chain gangs. If you like cutting the hands off people, then move to Saudi Arabia.
Do you realize that in some cultures and or religions pedophilia is not disapproved of? Does that make it OK too?
To me this is unnecessary complication and/or slicing hair compared to what I stated.
In Liberal LA-LA-Land, no homosexual behavior is bad---it's all good.
I'm from the world of individual accountability. One must attest for their own behavior and actions. What is dishonest is not to think man on boy pepohilia is not homosexual behavior---it is homoseexual behavior of the worst kind.
So I guess when an explosion occurs then you consider it splitting hairs whether it was dynamite or C4? The reason and source behind the action can be very important, even if two separate sources can cause the same results. If for no other reason, it determines how the treat.handle the person. Well outside the concept of kill them all. For example, an adult sees a young girl in a short skirt and halter top. To teach the girl a "lesson" about such "slutty behavior" (s)he sexually assaults the girl. This is not a pedophile as they are not attracted to the child. A girl that wears long skirts, and high neck blouses would be safe from this individual as they are not a pedophile. Mentally deranged, yes. And by legal definitions, yes. But any treatment under the idea that they are a pedophile would fail because they are treating the wrong source.
Definition of Homosexual:
1
: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex
2
: of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex
The word is what the word is. A male having sexual relations---rape or otherwise---has commited a homosexual act. A male man desiring to have sex with a boy is still a homosexual.
I'll go by what the traditional meaning and understanding of what homosexaulity is----not a white-washed, feel-good, new age, Orwellian understanding of what you think it should be.
Go back to post #16.
The Family Research Council (FRC) is an American conservative Christian group and lobbying organization formed in the United States in 1981 by James Dobson. It was incorporated in 1983.[2] In the late 1980s, the FRC officially became a division of Dobson's main organization, Focus on the Family, but after an administrative separation, the FRC became an independent entity in 1992. Tony Perkins is the current president.
The FRC promotes what it considers to be traditional family values, by advocating and lobbying for socially conservative policies. It opposes and lobbies against LGBT rights (such as same-sex marriage and LGBT adoption), abortion, divorce, embryonic stem-cell research and pornography.
Crime.
At what point did I make any claim towards a cure for pedophilia? There are numberous disorders for which there are no cures, yet people can treat and maintain these disorders and live normal or near normal lives. The age I listed is the medical definition. The legal definition of course can be different, going as low as 10, should a state wish, and range up to 18. Legal and medical definitions do not always match.
We are currently only treating pedophilia as a criminal event and not a disorder. Therefore we are not actually treating pedophilia at its root. If we can treat kleptomania, then we can treat pedophillia. Like kleptomania, a variety of methods will be necessary. The source of the disorder will not be the same in all pedophiles, nor will their reactions to various drugs and therapies be the same. If we don't treat the source of the problem, then it will continue to resurface.
I find it very telling that you didn't actually address the point of the question of do you punish the kleptomaniac before he steals.
Why not leave diagnosticians and law enforcers deal with it? Who cares what the sources behind actions of pedo's are anyway?
Because it is actually important. Why not say who aces about the cause of someone's depression? Because if it is environmentally caused, the treating it as genetic/a disorder can actually cause more harm than help. Additionally, one of the main underlying themes of this thread is about those pedophiles who have not harmed children and are seeking help.
I am only stating the facts---and the facts are that most pedophiles are not homosexuals, but that homosexuals commit acts of pedophilia far outside their statistical population.
How could anyone think that a 7-year old child could legally give its consent to anything?
Capital punishment and prison time serve as punishments----justice----AND behavior modification therapy.
Liberal psuedoscientists have been keen to use their evolving standards of indecency to justify criminal and unnatural acts.
The APA thought they could get away with listing pedophillia as a "sexual orientation" in their DSM 5---but were caught.
Quickly changing their diagnosis shows just how laughable their "science" is.
I say hanging pedophiles convicted of their actions is both a deterrent to other like people---and a permanent end of the behavior for the quilty party.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?