Seeing that the rebels are terrorists as well. Also someone the other day told me it was confirmed that the rebels have also used chemical weapons. Is this true? Why would the United States want to get involved in this seeing that both sides are enemies of the United States?
Seeing that the rebels are terrorists as well. Also someone the other day told me it was confirmed that the rebels have also used chemical weapons. Is this true? Why would the United States want to get involved in this seeing that both sides are enemies of the United States?
Seeing that the rebels are terrorists as well. Also someone the other day told me it was confirmed that the rebels have also used chemical weapons. Is this true? Why would the United States want to get involved in this seeing that both sides are enemies of the United States?
Fallacy. Not all rebels are terrorists. Most aren't, actually.
Depends on you definition of terrorist.
Only 6% of all rebels are so much as affiliated with al-Qaeda. Even some of the Islamist groups have taken care to avoid civilian casualties, something terrorists don't typically do. As for the main opposition, many of them aren't even Muslims
Seeing that the rebels are terrorists as well. Also someone the other day told me it was confirmed that the rebels have also used chemical weapons. Is this true? Why would the United States want to get involved in this seeing that both sides are enemies of the United States?
I agree with the premise that both sides are chock full of undesirable people.
I wonder if it has something to do with Israel. Get a fractured small force in power, which would be much easier than dealing with Assad and his friends in Iran. Just a thought, but I wonder if that's what it is.
Seeing that the rebels are terrorists as well. Also someone the other day told me it was confirmed that the rebels have also used chemical weapons. Is this true? Why would the United States want to get involved in this seeing that both sides are enemies of the United States?
Is this a joke? The Syrian border has been quiet for 40 years. Do you think a border controlled by the MB will be as calm?
The actual border's been fairly quiet, but Assad's got his fingers in the pie in Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon. That has a tendency to flare up once in a while. They've also supported Hamas, which has been a roadblock to a two-state solution.
The overthrow of Assad would be bad for Hezbollah and Hamas. Can you see why Israel would want that?
Syria agreed to let the United Nations inspect the site of a suspected chemical weapons attack from Monday but a U.S. official said any such offer would be "too late to be credible" and there was little doubt the government was to blame.
I am sure you can come up with reasons for israel being behind the ills of everything in the world including climate change.
Hold on. Strawman alert!
I'm not an Israel hater. I don't think they're behind the "Arab Spring" or anything bad that's happened from it. I just think that it's entirely possible that they'd like to be rid of Assad, which would be understandable if they did. I don't think they're evil, I think perhaps they have their own national security interests. And maybe, just maybe, we're helping them out since they are our ally.
Take your "Oh you just want to blame Israel for everything" elsewhere.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?