• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World War 3 map (1 Viewer)

I think current and future alliances are, at this point, somewhat Murkey. Each country will apply the rule of "who is your biggest adversary" to your ambitions.

For China, at the moment, the US appears to be it's biggest adversary. If there was any prior doubt, Trump's EXTREMELY aggressive tariffs to damage their export economy and seeming halfhearted posture to aid Tiawan means China will be looking for allies.

- Russia is a potential ally. Russia has shown it can manipulate US leaders, and effectively has turned the US into a friendly and supportive ally for its imperial ambitions. However, Russia also must balance its new power via Trump so as to not interfere with Trump should he wish to defend SE Asia from Chinese expansionism.

- Europe is also a potential ally. Trump is effectively destroying the post WW2 alliance of western and democratic nations. As Trump loves to shit on America's traditional allies (Israel excepted) China would find it most useful to ally with Europe, not only in Trade but also Geo Political influence. Unlike Russia, Europe and China have no reason to clash and while Europe was increasingly open to helping the US in defending Asia from Chinese expansion, Trump burned that bridge...paving the way for Europeans to give the finger to the US elsewhere.

- Asia. While seemingly unlikely, Trump is paving the way for Asian nations who can't trust Trump to consider a tributary state status with China. Trump has shown both China and the rest of the world is that he only has the courage of a bully, talks big but is totally unreliable, and will bend the knee to regional powers who will take what they want. Both regional "allies" and China know this and as Trump won't commit to helping Tiawan should China make a move; it is almost certain that sometime in Trump's term China will blockade Tiawan and my bet is that Trump will fold like a house of cards - he might even endorse it like he does Russia's naked aggression.

Russia

Russia' biggest adversary is all of Western Europe. It is in the position of using its power to "swing" between China and the US as it pleases to get what they want. Putin's next targets are in Europe, and the ones most likely on the top of his list is Moldovia and the Baltic States. As Russia no longer fears a NATO that is falling apart and a US that is cutting and running across the globe it probably won't need Chinas help, but if it should need China's help, it will gladly return the favor provide assistance to China in its imperial ambitions.

US

Trump has no clear strategic goals for the US so its potential adversaries are conditional upon Trump's whims of the moment, however they are usually focused on those weaker "friends" that he has leverage over. Trumps pattern has been "Keep your enemies close and your allies frightened of you so as to exploit their weakness". Hence, his prior leanings to SE Asian allies seems to be weakening, perhaps because he wants to carve up SE Asia between the US and China as cooperative imperialists.


Will there be a major war in the next five years?

Almost certainly. Trump's deliberate destruction on the western alliance and punishment of former allies will allow Putin to restart aggression in Europe after a rebuilding of Russian imperial forces. China may, in concert, begin a campaign to blockade and even take Tiawan. In addition, China may get serious about seizing the South China sea and with their ever-growing navy easily sink any smaller powers naval forces should they resist.

The US could be faced with combined Russian and Chinese aggression and Europe will be fighting in its own defense to give any help to the US in Asia, and even if it weren't, Trump has burned that bridge.

By 2028 the "World war" will be a result of US policy blunders and attempts to play "half court tennis" with Tariffs. Europe, Canada, Mexico will side with whoever hates the US, most likely China.

And it will occur in the next five years because the world's autocrats fear a future President who will likely start working to undue Trumps horrific damage to the world order so both Russia and China will want to move during or at the end of the Trump clown show is in office.
 
Last edited:
Can you provide quotes from any EU leader saying they should put troops in Ukraine before a peace deal is signed?

I haven't heard any, but of course, I don't get the on the ground news you get.
 
When people make a general statement about a group, in this case making a disparaging comment about Muslims, as if to suggest they are all bad
No, I'm saying if only a fraction of that 5% turns radical and joins Russia it can cause severe problems within Europe
 
1920px-BRICS%2C_partners_and_applicants_%282025-01%29.svg.png
When countries move away from the dollar, then thats not a good sign for the Western world
 
Can you provide quotes from any EU leader saying they should put troops in Ukraine before a peace deal is signed?

I haven't heard any, but of course, I don't get the on the ground news you get
No EU politician has come out publicly and said so.
On talk shows anonymous sources have apparently said that these talks are going on.
I dont know if that means putting troops inside Ukraine preemptively, or once a peace deal has been signed.

If I can find a reliable news source to confirm I'll post ITT
 
No, I'm saying if only a fraction of that 5% turns radical and joins Russia it can cause severe problems within Europe
Surrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre , that is exactly what you meant :rolleyes:
 
That people are even entertaining WW3 over a country most cant find on a map and who know literally **** all about its past...and the events surrounding the current state......


Thats a weird combination of hilarious and tragic.
 
No EU politician has come out publicly and said so.
On talk shows anonymous sources have apparently said that these talks are going on.
I dont know if that means putting troops inside Ukraine preemptively, or once a peace deal has been signed.

If I can find a reliable news source to confirm I'll post ITT
Thanks. Until then, the opinion I presented in my comment stands.
 
What did you think I meant??
That the entire 5% of muslim population would turn against Europe?
Let's take a look at what you said...............
The Islamic alliance is a serious threat to Europe because around 5% of the EU population is now muslim.
They have a sitting army in place that merely needs to be supplied with weapons.
Could anyone be more obvious about their Islamophobia?
 
That people are even entertaining WW3 over a country most cant find on a map and who know literally **** all about its past...and the events surrounding the current state......


Thats a weird combination of hilarious and tragic.
It's not specifically Ukraine that is the issue, it's the overall trend.

It's one of those slippery slope arguments, as in "well if we let them get away with this what will they try next".

I mean we already didn't stop Russia taking territory a few times in the past couple decades, so here we are.

But digging deeper, the issue is in part that the USA no longer has a lock on the world's currency, or at least it's slipping.
And we sat and watched while capitalism did what it does best - find the cheapest labor.
Which isn't in the USA.
 
Let's take a look at what you said...............

Could anyone be more obvious about their Islamophobia?
You mean the religion that's homophobic, transphobic, treats women like 2nd class citizens?? You mean that religion??!!

Oh, I'm very Islamophobic
 
You mean the religion that's homophobic, transphobic, treats women like 2nd class citizens?? You mean that religion??!!

Oh, I'm very Islamophobic
So, you believe in lumping ALL people of a particular religion or denomination into one basket?
 
@SNOWFLAKE

I'm talking about the radical arm of Islam.
Do you not understand the difference??
Then say so next time, sheesh.
If I said I had a phobia about Christians without mentioning which kinds of Christians you would assume I was intolerant of ALL Christians, amirite?
 
So this is not my map, but I think its right for the most part.
The countries who were neutral in WW2 will probably sit this one out too.
Some neutral countries might supply logistic support to other Western countries.

The US is marked a separate colour since under Trump they appear to have become isolationists.
The Islamic alliance is a serious threat to Europe because around 5% of the EU population is now muslim.
They have a sitting army in place that merely needs to be supplied with weapons.

Let me know what you think. Do you agree with the map??

View attachment 67559684

If we could get Uruguay, that would really be to our benefit.

-
 
That people are even entertaining WW3 over a country most cant find on a map and who know literally **** all about its past...and the events surrounding the current state......


Thats a weird combination of hilarious and tragic.

Most Americans would struggle to find the USA on a world map.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom