Words of a true patriot

[Corbell]

Again, IRRELEVENT.

They were innocent.

The confessions were coerced.

Just stop.

No more hateful racist, blame the colored people bullshit.

You said that the dna showed that the other rapists were innocent.


Tell me how the dna of one rapist being found on her, means that other rapists might not have done shit that just didn't leave dna on her.


Such as teh one that just held down her legs.


Woudl you argue that a man that held down the legs of a woman being gang raped, is "innocent" and should be released from prison?

 

[Corbell]

I bet the NYPD could have gotten you to confess to this, to the Kennedy assassination, and to Jimmy Hoffa's disappearance.

I might take this argument more seriously, if it was not for the focus on teh DNA, which is idiotic.

 

[Pyrite]

You said that the dna showed that the other rapists were innocent.


Tell me how the dna of one rapist being found on her, means that other rapists might not have done shit that just didn't leave dna on her.

But there's no evidence of "shit that just didn't leave dna on her".

Such as teh one that just held down her legs.

A false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.

Woudl you argue that a man that held down the legs of a woman being gang raped, is "innocent" and should be released from prison?

Again, a false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.

 

[Corbell]

IRRELEVENT.

The DNA EXHONERATED THEM.

The NYPD was well known for beating confessions out of people.

The finding of the dna of one rapists does not mean that there could not be other rapists that just failed to leave dna or left dna that was not found.

 

[Pyrite]

I might take this argument more seriously, if it was not for the focus on teh DNA, which is idiotic.

But there's no evidence of anything, save for false confessions.

That the "confessions" are NOT supported by DNA evidence gives a person pause - unless a person desperately wants the 5 to be perceived as guilty, to be convicted of rapes they didn't perpetrate.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

You said that the dna showed that the other rapists were innocent.

There were no "OTHER" rapists. There was ONE rapist. The DNA proved that.

Tell me how the dna of one rapist being found on her, means that other rapists might not have done shit that just didn't leave dna on her.

It means that only ONE PERSON raped her. It DOES NOT prove anybody else was involved.

Such as teh one that just held down her legs.

False confession.

Woudl you argue that a man that held down the legs of a woman being gang raped, is "innocent" and should be released from prison?

False confession.

 

[Corbell]

If his DNA wasn't present, he didn't rape her.

If DNA from the other 4 guys wasn't present, they didn't rape her. NONE of the 5 raped the victim.

So, there was no reason for the first guy to hold her legs down.

THUS, the statement of the first, "I held her legs down", was a false confession.

This is not rocket science.

Holy ****. THat's insanely... callous to rape victims whose rapists did not... leave dna on or in them.

YOu are... you have let your partisan zeal lead you to a very dark place.

I hope you think about this and come to walk it back, at least in your own mind. I know admitting error is generally beyond libs.

 

[brianpatrick]

YOur mud flinging is dismissed. In the real world, Trump's record on civil rights is fine.

Yes and there are “good people on both sides.”

 

[Corbell]

But there's no evidence of "shit that just didn't leave dna on her".

A false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.

Again, a false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.

YOu are just siding with the criminals against hte victim because that is what libs do.

 

[Cosmo]

"Trump asked members of his staff if he had been billed for the funeral. “What did it cost?” he asked. When informed that the total costs amounted to $60,000, Trump was incensed. “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a ****ing Mexican!” he reportedly told his then Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. “Don’t pay it!”

Trump reportedly complained later in the day that these “****ing people” are “trying to rip me off.”

Trump Was Enraged by Funeral Cost for 'F-king Mexican' U.S. Soldier: Report

Donald Trump was enraged over the cost of a soldier's funeral, calling her a "f--king Mexican," and pined for Hitler's generals, The Atlantic reports.

www.rollingstone.com

$60,000 does seem excessive for a funeral. Would you prefer a President who pays $500,000 for a funeral, $6,000,000 for a hammer, and $9,999,999,999 for an M-16?

 

[Pyrite]

Holy ****. THat's insanely... callous to rape victims whose rapists did not... leave dna on or in them.

YOu are... you have let your partisan zeal lead you to a very dark place.

I hope you think about this and come to walk it back, at least in your own mind. I know admitting error is generally beyond libs.

Not at all.

I believe in evidence. There is NONE in this tragedy that is sufficient to convict the 5 men.

You, however, seem to believe that because you want the 5 to have been guilty of rape, that because you want them to have been convicted of rape, the justice system should be perverted in order to punish innocent people.

 

[Corbell]

But there's no evidence of anything, save for false confessions.

That the "confessions" are NOT supported by DNA evidence gives a person pause - unless a person desperately wants the 5 to be perceived as guilty, to be convicted of rapes they didn't perpetrate.

I had no vested interest in this case. Until is was used to start talking shit on how racist america is or Trump is.


Since you made it political., let's discuss it as a political issue.


Your dismissal of the concept of rape without dna evidence, in another scenario, would see you cancelled by the lefty mob.

 

[Corbell]

Yes and there are “good people on both sides.”

Of the issue of historical statues? Of course.

Were you seriously pushing the debunked lie that Trump said that nazis were "Very fine people"?

Cause that woudl be very pathetic of you.

 

[Pyrite]

Pyrite said:
But there's no evidence of "shit that just didn't leave dna on her".
A false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.
Again, a false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.

YOu are just siding with the criminals against hte victim because that is what libs do.

Post #109


Here you acknowledge you don't believe in our evidence-based system of justice.

 

[Corbell]

Pyrite said:
But there's no evidence of "shit that just didn't leave dna on her".
A false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.
Again, a false confession, because none of the 5 raped the victim.


Post #109


Here you acknowledge you don't believe in our evidence-based system of justice.

DNA doesn't give a pass on rapes that don't leave dna.


The stated rational for the dismissals, was a massive injustice against the victim and all women.

 

[brianpatrick]

Of the issue of historical statues? Of course.

Were you seriously pushing the debunked lie that Trump said that nazis were "Very fine people"?

Cause that woudl be very pathetic of you.

I’m fine with you thinking I’m pathetic.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Holy ****. THat's insanely... callous to rape victims whose rapists did not... leave dna on or in them.

YOu are... you have let your partisan zeal lead you to a very dark place.

I hope you think about this and come to walk it back, at least in your own mind. I know admitting error is generally beyond libs.

They were EXHONORATED.

Accept it.

 

[Pyrite]

Pyrite said:
But there's no evidence of anything, save for false confessions.
That the "confessions" are NOT supported by DNA evidence gives a person pause - unless a person desperately wants the 5 to be perceived as guilty, to be convicted of rapes they didn't perpetrate.

I had no vested interest in this case. Until is was used to start talking shit on how racist america is or Trump is.

Yes, you do. You ignore the fact there is NO physical evidence linking the 5 to raping the victim.

@Corbell:
Since you made it political., let's discuss it as a political issue.

``````````````````````````````````````````

Look up. I have NOT "made it political" in the message YOU responded to. But you sure did.


@Corbell:
Your dismissal of the concept of rape without dna evidence, in another scenario, would see you cancelled by the lefty mob.

```````````````````````

Neither I nor anyone else here has done this. For you to make this accusation is unwarranted.

YOU are insisting that the 5 young men were guilty, despite the lack of physical evidence. Your basis for your desire to convict them? False confessions. You want them to have been guilty, so you decide they are. You would have them convicted on that basis - and THAT is what anti-rule-of-law, pro-lynching MOBS DO.

 

[The Hairy Fiddler]

Carbell and Trump=racists. Why feed the troll?

 

[ColdHardTruth]

YOu are just siding with the criminals against hte victim because that is what libs do.

This is nonsensical bullshit.

Trolling is not going to help you.

 

[Pyrite]

Pyrite said:
But there's no evidence of anything, save for false confessions.
That the "confessions" are NOT supported by DNA evidence gives a person pause - unless a person desperately wants the 5 to be perceived as guilty, to be convicted of rapes they didn't perpetrate.




Yes, you do. You ignore the fact there is NO physical evidence linking the 5 to raping the victim.

@Corbell:
Since you made it political., let's discuss it as a political issue.

``````````````````````````````````````````

Look up. I have NOT "made it political" in the message YOU responded to. But you sure did.


@Corbell:
Your dismissal of the concept of rape without dna evidence, in another scenario, would see you cancelled by the lefty mob.

```````````````````````

Neither I nor anyone else here has done this. For you to make this accusation is unwarranted.

YOU are insisting that the 5 young men were guilty, despite the lack of physical evidence. Your basis for your desire to convict them? False confessions. You want them to have been guilty, so you decide they are. You would have them convicted on that basis - and THAT is what anti-rule-of-law, pro-lynching MOBS DO.

That there are Americans who want to charge and convict and punish Americans in this manner sickens me.

It angers me. Star chambers have no place in our legal system. Nor do false confessions.

We use EVIDENCE, not what people want to be the case.

That there people who don't accept our legal and justice system is capable of making mistakes and ADMITTING those mistakes also scares the shit out of me.

 

[Questerr]

They confessed. And were released for a reason that is so stupid that I cannot describe how stupid it is.

They confessed after hours of coercive interrogation. Police regularly coerce confessions that are later overturned.

 

[Pyrite]

They confessed after hours of coercive interrogation. Police regularly coerce confessions that are later overturned.

Funny, isn't it, that so many Americans dismiss the reality of false/coerced confessions, on the assumption that they and their people will never, ever, be in those situations, will ever be victimized in this manner....

 

[Pyrite]

Carbell and Trump=racists. Why feed the troll?

Good point.

Thanks.

 

[iguanaman]

"Reportedly"? From the ****ING ROLLINGSTONES?

lol. Dismissed.

It is from Mark Meadows. Do you remember him?