• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Women’s student debt will soon hit $1 trillion

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,372
Reaction score
82,753
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Women’s student debt will soon hit $1 trillion




Student debt is an ever increasing problem that weighs on the shoulders of college graduates for many many years.
 
Women’s student debt will soon hit $1 trillion





Student debt is an ever increasing problem that weighs on the shoulders of college graduates for many many years.

In part because women graduate at a much higher rate then do men, because universities stock their rainbows by enrolling men who should not be there.....men who fail to graduate and often have debt to pay for being a part of the rainbow.

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_326.10.asp


University debt is both a mens and a womens issue, trying to make it a womans issues goes to show how intellectually bankrupt we are now.
 
University debt is both a mens and a womens issue, trying to make it a womans issues goes to show how intellectually bankrupt we are now.

Just reading the first sentence would have been enough to maybe stop you from highlighting your ignorance.

"Student debt is on its way to becoming a universally American problem, but there’s more evidence to indicate that it’s a particularly acute challenge for women."

That evidence stuff, it sure is a bugger for some, ain't it?
 

If I make a title "blacks have it unfair", but then only talk about economic disparity for working class, benign of race....


Wouldn't a little push back be expected? I mean, I believe that would be called baiting.
 
it sucks. we're pricing kids out of education, and society is suffering because of it.

well clearly we're not pricing people out of education since college enrollment is almost 40% higher then 20 years ago. I don't call that being priced out.

society is only suffering because we're guaranteeing loans. pull the government out of loans and grants and this problem corrects itself
 
If I make a title "blacks have it unfair", but then only talk about economic disparity for working class, benign of race....


Wouldn't a little push back be expected? I mean, I believe that would be called baiting.

I think you are trying to make some point here.
 
And tuitions would drop. Since the gov't pays it is whatever the traffic will bear. It's a great business./
 
And tuitions would drop. Since the gov't pays it is whatever the traffic will bear. It's a great business./

Yep.

cutting loans and pell grants in entirety would be GOOD because college tuition would drop to more affordable levels, and so would enrollment, but the reality is many college graduates work jobs where college is not needed to prepare you for and many of the jobs college IS currently needed for used to be structured around vocational training (ie Nurses or engineers) or on the job training. Many students could work their college tuition away over the summer, and those who didn't have much money could often get scholarships from churches or other funds, but because those places have more limited resources they will make sure the prospective student is someone really dedicated who won't blow their money or resources, and so you'd have to show acheivement at High School or the workplace or dedication to the community so they know you're a good investment.

putting so many people in college in government backed loans is a disaster, and eliminating tuition as Helix believes should be done is outright mad.
 
So these adults are not smart enough not to go into debt but children are smart enough to tell us what our laws should be???

I just want to make sure I have my facts straight.

If you are not smart enough to go to a community college then transfer to another school and work while in school to pay for that education, don't look to me for help.
 

I work with a bunch of kids, and most of them are in debt up to their noses. "Getting the government out" isn't going to fix it.
 
I work with a bunch of kids, and most of them are in debt up to their noses. "Getting the government out" isn't going to fix it.

no you don't, kids are not legally allowed to sign for debt, so you work with no "kids" who are in debt up to their noses. This is a big distinction, adult decisions made as an adult must be treated like adults.


Yes, getting the government out will fix everything because without state backed security the college loan lenders wouldn't loan money to an 18 year old (who's not a kid,) with no assets and is seeking money for a degree that can't provide employment adequate to repay the loan. you would either need security or a means to convince a lender they will see their money plus interest back.
 
Last edited:

I want to correct this, I thought for sure there was some crooked **** even the feds wouldn't do, turns out I was wrong, The Feds will loanshark minors for "federal student loans" and have voided the infancy defense for payment of federal student loans. So Helix wants more government, the same government that actually is loansharking children. my apologies for this mistake of fact, doesn't change my opinion. the Feds need to get out of education lending.
 

post secondary education and job training should be treated like high school. a hundred years ago, there were probably a bunch of people saying that we couldn't do that, either. we can, and we did.
 
post secondary education and job training should be treated like high school. a hundred years ago, there were probably a bunch of people saying that we couldn't do that, either. we can, and we did.

No, it shouldn’t. Post secondary education is more costly and less necessary. Education is subject to the law of diminishing returns. Whatever arguments occurred a hundred years ago are irrelevant to current policy.

Studies have shown the majority of college graduates don’t work within their major, that academic rigor has been lessened to accommodate more students, that the majority of jobs require either no college or specialized training where liberal arts education is a mere distraction, furthermore the cost has skyrocketed and real incomes declined which is largely due to government involvement. “They said it couldn’t be done and by god we overcame, and there’s more mountains to climb, amen brother!” is not an argument against any of that.
 

The interesting thing is that one can learn what's necessary for lucrative careers without university. Mastering the material on HackerRank (click on link) and Kaggle: Your Home for Data Science (click on link) will make you very employable.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…