Montecresto
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 24,561
- Reaction score
- 5,507
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Decapitating innocent people seems to be a Muslim preoccupation for the last decade or so. If any Christians are doing anything like this you should point it out and they'll be properly condemned. I doubt that any Christians would offer the schoolyard taunt that Jews do it also.
..and don't get me started on FRANCE...Uh oh! Your always blowing things up BE,!
In fact it's mentioned frequently.
"Ethnic cleansing" is your term, not his.
I doubt it. Most Muslims don't cause trouble.
In fact it has been Muslims murdering Brits, and raping them as we can see on anther thread, that as caused some anger.
A little investigation will determine that a big problem is Muslim killing Muslim.
It's childlike in its analysis and doesn't differ much from the mindset of the Muslim under discussion.
Which only confirms the point I am making to you and others. You start killing people those people get angry..
You start killing people those people get angry.
So, you think Islamist terrorists are "the victims", that they are justified in wanting to murder Norwegians en masse and that it is "stupid and delusional" to hold Islamist terrorists responsible for their actions.
oneworld said:So to try to put all of the blame for this rising threat of Islamic terrorism and the radicalisation of some Muslims in Europe on either the religion itself , as too many people do, or a handful of genuinely extremist elements within it, is not only incredibly stupid but outright delusional . We are good at blaming the victims in order to absolve ourselves from any wrong doings and it's pathetic
that is one of the more outrageous statements in support of terrorism I have seen in these forums.
It would be a disturbing development if radical Islam was now anti-cat.
If you are unable or unwilling to factor in the state terrorism prosecuted against the Muslim world by western governments over the last 20 odd years , terrorism you probably supported , then you will never see my point.
I didn't realize that for Muslims, the raping of children is the logical method for dealing with your anger.
Do tell us more!
The Mahmudiyah killings were the gang-rape and killing of 14-year-old Iraqi girl Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi by United States Army soldiers on March 12, 2006, and the murder of her family, in a house to the southwest of Yusufiyah, a village to the west of the town of Al-Mahmudiyah, Iraq.
As an Islamist, you justify the rape of children and think measures taken against terrorists is actually the terrorism.
and you wonder why decent people despise Islamism the way they do.
Oh, wait, I forgot -- it's "Islamophobia" when people respond to your hatred.
My side? What side is that?Not by your side it's not
That you used the term, and told a lie, is what's relevant.What he advocated was ethnic cleansing, that he didn't use the term himself is irrelevant. What would you describe it as ?
There were fewer acts of Islamic terrorism in the UK when there were fewer Muslims. And there were no wars against Muslims in Iraq. Even modest research will show that Muslims were killing Muslims, either by war or through terrorism against innocents.Here's a little bit of research for you to do. We have had a sizeable Muslim comminity in Britain for decades so check out how many terrorist attacks were committed by Muslims in Europe prior to the two Iraq wars.
I realize that drones are killing Islamic terrorists. Less terrorism equals less violence.Which only confirms the point I am making to you and others. You start killing people those people get angry. In the research mentioned in the above you can include how many Muslims have been killed , maimed or displaced in the Western wars I referred you to. And then add the Afghanistan and Pakistan to the package. You do realize that there have been US drones killing people in Somalia and Yemen too ?
I live in a civilized culture where we don't get revenge on a third party by murdering children in a restaurant or women in a supermarket. Only uncivilized pigs do that.That's what happens when you destabalize countries and use those factional differences to your own advantage. Like what happened in Iraq. It's an old colonial trick that still works today.
It's not just a Muslim thing though is it ?
Mahmudiyah killings - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How much more of this went on nobody will ever know
Considering many hate dogs it wouldn't be too far-fetched.
You justified the rape of children in post 228.I'm an atheist not an " Islamist " and I haven't " justified " the rape of children as you already know because you have obviously read the posts I made in that thread that referred to them as " crimes "
These are just baseless slurs/ad hominems because you arguments are too weak
Only uncivilized pigs do that.
Wow - those collection agencies can really get nasty.
That you used the term, and told a lie, is what's relevant.
There were fewer acts of Islamic terrorism in the UK when there were fewer Muslims.
I just left there and it absolutely is true. There are specialized units with guns but 90 pct of the officers do not
You justified the rape of children in post 228.
Quite directly so.
But you cannot quote me doing so ?
Slurs and more slurs , is that all you people have ?
My questions were inspired by the fact I'd read this prior to replying; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ue-fatwa-condemning-terror-group-9702042.htmlWhat the hell kind of a response is that? I'm not hearing anything from moderates, nothing, chirp chirp..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?