- Joined
- Jul 27, 2014
- Messages
- 17,226
- Reaction score
- 6,895
- Location
- Mountains
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
This isn't the final count, obviously. They are updating every few minutes. I just find the 18 point difference between the poll and the ongoing vote count interesting. I will be watching to see how much this changes as the next couple of weeks go by.
Current Election Results | Wisconsin Vote
Hillary Clinton (D)
544,576 29.7%
Donald J. Trump (R)
Projected Winner
736,920 40.2%
RCP has Clinton ahead in the polls by 7 points.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Wisconsin: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
Early voting favors republicans but that is nearly half the amount of votes cast in the 2012 election. The most interesting part is how many vote Johnson has he looks to finish in double digits, much better than his polling.
This isn't the final count, obviously. They are updating every few minutes. I just find the 18 point difference between the poll and the ongoing vote count interesting. I will be watching to see how much this changes as the next couple of weeks go by.
Current Election Results | Wisconsin Vote
Hillary Clinton (D)
544,576 29.7%
Donald J. Trump (R)
736,920 40.2%
RCP has Clinton ahead in the polls by 7 points.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Wisconsin: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
Here are county results:
Current Election Results by County | Wisconsin Vote
President - General --TEST
I'm pretty sure this is just a test, not actual numbers.
Let's hope.
There used to be en embargo in place till election day.
There is. They'll release the number of ballots that have gone out, but a state would never release results beforehand. And those are definitely not legitimate numbers. It's about 5 times as many votes as ballots that have actually gone out.
Wisconsin early voting numbers tallied
So did the site get hacked, because it looks like a legitimate Wisconsin site?
It says Test, from what I can gather that's all it is. But it's definitely not the legitimate results.
There is. They'll release the number of ballots that have gone out, but a state would never release results beforehand. And those are definitely not legitimate numbers. It's about 5 times as many votes as ballots that have actually gone out.
Wisconsin early voting numbers tallied
I don't like the idea of announcing vote counts until after the general election has been completed.
They haven't.
What's in the OP?
What's in the OP?
Correction: Test Election Returns Accidentally Released on Wisconsin Vote
Editor's Note: Earlier, what appeared to be "live election results" were displayed on this website. These numbers weren't actual voting returns, but instead were random numbers our election results provider was using to test their Election Day reporting software. These tests weren't meant to be displayed, but were accidentally made available to be accessed. No real votes, including those cast via early absentee voting, will be counted in Wisconsin until polls close at 8 p.m. on Nov. 8. We apologize for any confusion this has caused. WisconsinVote.org will have actual live election results on the evening of Nov. 8.
I'm pretty sure this is just a test, not actual numbers.
Editor's Note: Earlier, what appeared to be "live election results" were displayed on this website. These numbers weren't actual voting returns, but instead were random numbers our election results provider was using to test their Election Day reporting software. These tests weren't meant to be displayed, but were accidentally made available to be accessed. No real votes, including those cast via early absentee voting, will be counted in Wisconsin until polls close at 8 p.m. on Nov. 8. We apologize for any confusion this has caused. WisconsinVote.org will have actual live election results on the evening of Nov. 8.
Hahaha...we're probably seeing real numbers and everyone's scrambling. I predict that if Hillary wins, it'll be by the lowest vote total ever.
Hahaha...we're probably seeing real numbers and everyone's scrambling. I predict that if Hillary wins, it'll be by the lowest vote total ever.
Early voting is meaningless and always has been.This isn't the final count, obviously. They are updating every few minutes. I just find the 18 point difference between the poll and the ongoing vote count interesting. I will be watching to see how much this changes as the next couple of weeks go by.
Current Election Results | Wisconsin Vote
Hillary Clinton (D)
544,576 29.7%
Donald J. Trump (R)
736,920 40.2%
RCP has Clinton ahead in the polls by 7 points.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Wisconsin: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
Here are county results:
Current Election Results by County | Wisconsin Vote
Supporters of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump are passing around early voting totals which purport to show Trump up big in Wisconsin, a swing state that that appeared to be solidly in the camp of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. But the early voting totals are clearly fake, though their exact origin is unclear.
The results in question come from WisconsinVote.org, a joint operation of Wisconsin Public Radio and Wisconsin Public Television. The website is primarily a public service, offering information on candidates, races, issues, and how to register to vote. But the website also features a results page, which intriguingly currently shows Trump with a large lead over Clinton. While current polls show Trump trailing by about 7 points, the results page shows him destroying Clinton 40.2 percent to 29.7 percent. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson has a hefty 19.8 percent while various other third parties are given the rest.
The results page shows supposed results in other races, including the U.S. Senate race (Russ Feingold is beating Ron Johnson) and Paul Ryan’s House race (he’s losing to challenger Ryan Solen).
Unsurprisingly, the results are being passed around by Trump fans online, having popped up on Reddit and repeatedly on Twitter.
But a close look reveals that the results are very obviously fake, and it’s not simply because the results are pro-Trump.
First off, the basic idea of the results is fallacious. While Wisconsin allows people to vote early either in-person or absentee, early votes aren’t actually counted until election day. Even if the votes were being counted, the page lists far too many votes to reflect the current reality. According to the Wisconsin Elections Commission, only 223,000 early votes have even been collected.
Further, while the presidential results look relatively “real” (albeit very unexpected), downballot races on the page do not. Almost every House or state legislative race shows the winner leading 55 percent to 45 percent exactly, a level of consistency that would never be seen in real life.
(snip)
The Daily Caller News Foundation reached out to WisconsinVote but has not yet received a reply.
Update: Andy Soth of Wisconsin Public Television replied to TheDCNF and explained that the results were simply random numbers not meant to be seen by the public.
“The Associated Press regularly puts out test results in advance of election day so that media subscribers can be sure that all systems are in place to receive the data,” Soth said. “Usually we only use these results on a test server that requires a log in. Some of the test results have been put on our live server accidentally. They are not linked to or publicized through WisconsinVote.org but can be found via an internet search. The numbers are completely fictional, randomly assigned, and used only for testing.”
Those results are FAKE. (Does any state count or release early votes this early? No.)
People Are Sharing Obviously Fake Pro-Trump Election Results From Wisconsin | The Daily Caller
What's in the OP?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?