- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
. . .and for the 1456987th time, turtledude has just finished quoting his Messiah rush limbaugh.
Difficult to say what's more pathetic--the fact that right wingers are actually stupid enough to believe that any money not dumped into union pockets will actually be returned to the people in the form of lower taxes, as opposed to subsidies for specific individuals. . .
or the fact that they think romney will give them a job:lol:
What last night showed is that the people support what Walker is doing and that results actually matter. That doesn't bode well for November for Obama because Obama cannot run on his record. Unions wasted millions and millions of dollars to lose in a landslide. That message will resonate all over the nation. Watch Obama poll numbers now.
This election shows the "conservatives" just how much money they need to spend to win these elections.
Not wise to count chickens...but if voters are going to ask themselves "Who's more likely to help me get back to work?" three+ years in office suggest that the answer won't be President Obama.
Scott Walker received reportedly 70% of his funding from out of state thus denying the voter of Wisconsin the right to determine their own governor. The practice is wrong no matter who does it or who benefits. Wrong is wrong.
Scott Walker received reportedly 70% of his funding from out of state thus denying the voter of Wisconsin the right to determine their own governor. The practice is wrong no matter who does it or who benefits. Wrong is wrong.
Not wise to count chickens...but if voters are going to ask themselves "Who's more likely to help me get back to work?" three+ years in office suggest that the answer won't be President Obama.
Scott Walker received reportedly 70% of his funding from out of state thus denying the voter of Wisconsin the right to determine their own governor. The practice is wrong no matter who does it or who benefits. Wrong is wrong.
Don't read too much into it. The way you guys are talking, you think it's a slam dunk for Romney to win Wisconsin. Considering the power shift in the Senate, don't.
I support Romney personally, but he's still gonna have to work for it. He shouldn't start measuring the drapes in the White House yet.
Scott Walker received reportedly 70% of his funding from out of state thus denying the voter of Wisconsin the right to determine their own governor. The practice is wrong no matter who does it or who benefits. Wrong is wrong.
I'm really not "you guys, " and I just said, "Don't count your chickens..." My other point was that Obama can't run on his record, and I don't think he can.
Oh, Good Lord,, you think funding was more important than people voting their own pocket books? Results matter and Walker has generated some good results which is what matters. Wherever Walker got his money is irrelevant because people are always going to vote their pocket books.
X and Conservative, are you both saying that money doesn't factor into elections? Next you all are going to tell me that AIPAC has only piddling influence on the Hill.
If money from out of state doesn't mean squat, why was so much out of state money sent to the Walker campaign?
Reading Democratic Underground after Scotts victory is funny. They are completely pissed. I guess many of them are overpaid public sector employees who will see their wages cut.
****. - Democratic Underground
Warning, foul language.
Scott Walker received reportedly 70% of his funding from out of state thus denying the voter of Wisconsin the right to determine their own governor. The practice is wrong no matter who does it or who benefits. Wrong is wrong.
They weren't denied anything. They were the ones who actually got to vote. Honestly, Risky, it seems like some of you would rather manufacture some other reason why Walker won instead of accepting or looking at the real reasons he did.
X and Conservative, are you both saying that money doesn't factor into elections? Next you all are going to tell me that AIPAC has only piddling influence on the Hill.
If money from out of state doesn't mean squat, why was so much out of state money sent to the Walker campaign?
If those people providing the 70% of funding voted then you might have a point.If those ads were votes you might have a point. However, providing political ads is not denying anyone the right to determine their own governor.
How much did Barrett recieve?
Libs complained about outside funding when Californians voted to ban gay marriage for the 2nd or 3rd time. I wonder if libs will do the same thing and put these scott walker contributors on some **** list like they did with the proponents of traditional marriage.
Wonder what liberals are going to say using the money argument in supporting Obama this fall. His goal of raising a billion dollars is quite telling. Is Obama trying to buy the election like liberals claim Walker did in Wisconsin?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?