100% agreed. The people, men and women included have to stand up for themselves....not demand the government stand up for them.
No. Liberals want the way it was where white people and Asians were sent to the back of the bus, which is their way of getting reparations.
Well, if you listen to these neo-leftists complain that racism and misogyny are more worse now than ever, then it means the US government is not able to fix the problems. Out of curiosity, how many problems has the US government actually fixed in the last 100 years? It's actually a good argument for anarchy.
That brings up another key point. Why is it that Asians, male and female, do so well in America? Asian women are minorities and female, a double whammy, yet they consistently outperform many white men. Kinda' bitch slaps the victimhood narratives right across the face, doesn't it?
I saw the reason firsthand visiting with an Asian couple in my occupation who owned a small business. It was about 4:30 and their son came in to help them after school. I was curious and asked about it. They matter fact told me that this was expected in their culture and that when he got home, he had dinner and homework. That was the routine. That is why they get As because it is demanded of them, and why they too will have their own small business when they are adults. Oddly they did not complain that minorities were put ahead of them because Asians chose not to be victims.
From my childhood experiences I think the secret to success isn't being white and having rich parents, it's just having good parents, especially fathers. I agree with Denzel Washington that a lot of the problems in black communities stem from the lack of fathers in the home.
I think we need less federal government and better local communities. We are all the results of our parents and our local community. All the federal government does is try to override parents and local communities and ultimately ****s up everything it touches.
I am optimistically guarded but remain hopeful that the naysayers who want MORE paternal type government, involvement in our lives, live to see to see that they were wrong. I hope they live to realize that the government has caused this bloat by pandering to them for their votes.
You are correct that people naturally segregate, but the difference is between inclusion and exclusion. I choose to sit with liberals but don’t exclude republicans who want to join us.
Actually, @Big Brother, I was wrong about that figure but not off by much. It's even better than 76%
New Harvard-Harris Poll: Nearly 80% Of Respondents Support DOGE Cutting Government Waste
But it’s OK with you that government intrude in your body telling you that you must breed against your will. I guess it’s OK for the government toslash necessary departments and appoint people who are incompetent to head departments
I lived in one local community, but I taught in a different local community. Mine was wealthy and where I taught was poverty.. We had inferior equipment., inferior books etc…. Where I lived, the schools were top of the line with equipment.
Part of the answer is, they didn’t come here in chains and weren’t to find as inferior
Well, obviously, you’re much younger than I am I remember all those things and I am grateful that you don’t because it shows that my activism helped women
Says that you are going to need for health and safety are being cut, but yet billionaires are not getting tax increases… keep fighting for them
Poverty causes people to drop out of school because they have to work. That’s what my husband did in the 10th grade..
That sounds a bit like a problem
The switch that is closest right after the civil rights act passed, Black people were Republicans and they became Democrats and the red state became Republicans or do you believe that the KKK and the proud boys are all Democrats?Complete Mythological Nonsense:
The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch':
"After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy--a strong proponent of civil rights--in late 1963, Southern Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson saw it as his mission to pass the CIVIL Rights Act as a tribute to Kennedy, who had first proposed the bill five months before he was killed. Democrats in the Senate, however, filibustered it.
In June of 1964 though, the bill came up again, and it passed, over the strenuous objections of Southern Democrats. 80% of House Republicans voted for the measure, compared with just 61% of Democrats, while 82% of Republicans in the Senate supported it, compared with 69% of Democrats.
Nearly all of the opposition was, naturally, in the South, which was still nearly unanimously Democratic and nearly unanimously resistant to the changing country. One thing that most assuredly didn't change, though, was party affiliation. A total of 21 Democrats in the Senate opposed the Civil Rights Act. Only one of them, "Dixiecrat" Strom Thurmond, ever became a Republican. The rest, including Al Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd--a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan--remained Democrats until the day they died.
Moreover, as those 20 lifelong Democrats retired, their Senate seats remained in Democrat hands for several decades afterwards. So too did the overwhelming majority of the House seats in the South until 1994, when a Republican wave election swept the GOP into control of the House for the first time since 1952. 1994 was also the first time Republicans ever held a majority of House seats in the South--a full 30 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act.
,fit(1200,675),quality(65))
The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch' | News/Talk 1130 WISN | Dan O'Donnell
Dan O'Donnell debunks a popular myth that the two political parties switched positions and that racist southern Democrats became Republicans during the Civil Rights Era.newstalk1130.iheart.com
Democrats WANT people to believe the "switch" occurred way back when, but that is a myth perpetuated by the Democracts. Meanwhile Joe Biden is the "racist" responsible for the 1994 Crime Bill that led to the incarceration of so many Black Americans over sale and/or possession of tiny amounts of certain drugs.