• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will Planned Parenthood get defunded?

Will PP get defunded?


  • Total voters
    33
I swear, I don't think I've seen such big britches talk by Republicans since the early days of GW Bush and even then it wasn't near as nasty.

When dealing with nasty women, a certain level of nastiness will be need to be expected.
 
Last edited:
The Left who?

So don't jump to conclusions that I'm anything that people may politically be labeled.

I voted Republican a lot of times during my voting life, but I've also voted for Democrats, Libertarians...
 
When dealing with nasty women, a certain level of nastiness will be need expected.

WTF? I said "BRITCHES"...not "BITCHES"...wow! You're quite a man. An anti-woman man.
 
WTF? I said "BRITCHES"...not "BITCHES"...wow! You're quite a man. An anti-woman man.

You said it is really nasty right now, even more so than the George W. Bush days. Again, we are dealing with some nasty women!
 
You see, you hit the nail on the head there. It would be pretending. That is being too liberal with reality for many.

He's already pretending the PP funding is his...so why not play along?
 
You said it is really nasty right now, even more so than the George W. Bush days. Again, we are dealing with some nasty women!

YOU ARE DEALING WITH NASTY WOMEN...nobody else is. Nobody else sees women as nasty. You wouldn't have to have your DP handle shown on your posts and I'd be able to recognize them all.
 
1. PP actually help destroy families. Many of the contraceptives increase the risk to breast and cervical cancer, strokes, heart attacks, tumors etc.

2. Yes, the pro-choice groups do hide facts. They hide the statistics of abortion increasing the chances of a women having breast cancer or some form of PTSD. And again, back to point (1) these contraceptives PP are giving out, the majority to minority women are increasing their chance of early death.

Planned Parenthood knows all this and doesn't care. I see.

3. Whoever performs the abortion.

Decent answer

4. Abortion is never safe.

You know this how?

5. The fetus would be born. I am unsure how this is difficult to understand.

Strange, didn't see you at the ultrasound, or at the follow up consultation with the (apparently woefully ignorant) doctor.
 
Blaming somebody else, I see. Thank you for making my point for me.

Amazing. Fricking AMAZING at the partisan hackery that goes on. Gezzzzzzzzus. :roll:

Robots everywhere. Oddly half of the folks can't even agree on what their claimed political philosophy means, much less a parties planks and platforms are.
 
He's already pretending the PP funding is his...so why not play along?

Are you suggesting none of my money goes to fund it?
 
What part of what you quoted didn't you understand ?? PP isn't the only women's health care provider in town. Plus they can well afford to self fund.

PP's political PAC's spend around 6mil per election cycle. PP receives around 1mil per election cycle of federal funding. PP can fully and easily fund themselves.

In reality PP is acquiring funds, they don't need, when the funds could help a needful medical clinic.

First of all...quoting you doesn't make you right. Secondly...if you're going to make claims about PP's spending...you need to provide a link to a credible source. Until then, nothing in your post aligns with reality.
 
Are you suggesting none of my money goes to fund it?

I'm suggesting that your money is spent on things that I don't like and my money is spent on the things that you don't like. So what's the problem?
 
Amazing. Fricking AMAZING at the partisan hackery that goes on. Gezzzzzzzzus. :roll:

Robots everywhere. Oddly half of the folks can't even agree on what their claimed political philosophy means, much less a parties planks and platforms are.

Just calling a spade a spade. It is not my responsibility if that offends anyone. :shrug:
 
Unfortunately we always have to play the white hat.

Guilt keeps working long after it had a right to.......both self imposed and generated by the political pressure centers.
 
I also love how biological facts are pro-life according to you. No Kal, biological facts are just biological facts. Facts are not biased, but just facts.

After looking into the person that you referenced it should be noted that she works for The Center of Bioethics and Human Dignity which is a Christian research center as evidenced on her About Page. Using science to push an agenda by misrepresenting that science is at best pseudo science.

In reality what is and isn't an organism is very simple to define.

Organism

An individual living thing that can react to stimuli, reproduce, grow, and maintain homeostasis. It can be a virus, bacterium, protist, fungus, plant or an animal.

The ONLY thing that a zygote does out of all of that is grow. A zygote cannot react to stimuli. It cannot reproduce. And it cannot maintain homeostasis.
 
In passing their health-care bill, House Republicans have also taken a first step toward dramatically slashing federal funds for Planned Parenthood clinics.

The women’s health provider stands to lose about 30 percent of its funding under a provision in the GOP health-care bill to block it from getting Medicaid reimbursements for one year unless its hundreds of clinics stop offering abortions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...under-gop-health-bill/?utm_term=.ddeb6cc5d8c7

PP shot themselves in the foot. Trump already told them if they stop abortions, they received funding and Medicaid reimbursements. PP cares more about abortions than actually helping women.
 
Back
Top Bottom