- Joined
- Aug 18, 2017
- Messages
- 20,025
- Reaction score
- 12,035
- Location
- SW Wisconsin
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Because regardless of his belief he was overruled so now must (as his oath requires him to) he must rule on tbe facts presented.Why would he vote to convict after he has voted the process to be unconstitutional?
Unfortunately Republicans have proven that oaths have no meaning to them...