• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WikiLeaks Says Assange's Internet Link Was Severed by 'State Party'

S

sanman

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Messages
17,399
Reaction score
7,263
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Wikileaks founder and fugitive under asylum at Ecuadorian Embassy, Julian Assange has suffered a loss of his internet access due to what he says was state intervention. He says contingency plans are being pursued to regain him communication ability.

WikiLeaks says Assange's internet link was severed by 'state party' | Fox News

WikiLeaks said Monday that its founder Julian Assange’s internet link was severed by a “state party” and that “appropriate contingency plans” were activated.
Click to expand...


Julian Assange Internet ‘Intentionally Severed’: 5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787889195507417088

5az_bor.webp

I dunno what the hell's going on - I hope that US/Western govt didn't just surreptitiously decide Assange is Soviet agent and thus legit target for cyber-attack to take down his communication to shut him up exactly during the final critical few weeks of the elections to protect Hillary from further disclosures.

Because, you know - using state power to intervene on the side of a particular candidate during an election is a sure way to make the state look like it favors a particular candidate - thus destroying the credibility of the electoral process.
 
Last edited:
sanman said:
Wikileaks founder and fugitive under asylum at Ecuadorian Embassy, Julian Assange has suffered a loss of his internet access due to what he says was state intervention. He says contingency plans are being pursued to regain him communication ability.

WikiLeaks says Assange's internet link was severed by 'state party' | Fox News




Julian Assange Internet ‘Intentionally Severed’: 5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787889195507417088

View attachment 67208729

I dunno what the hell's going on - I hope that US/Western govt didn't just surreptitiously decide Assange is Soviet agent and thus legit target for cyber-attack to take down his communication to shut him up exactly during the final critical few weeks of the elections to protect Hillary from further disclosures.

Because, you know - using state power to intervene on the side of a particular candidate during an election is a sure way to make the state look like it favors a particular candidate - thus destroying the credibility of the electoral process.
Click to expand...

Maybe this is the punishment Kerry threatened the Russians with.

:peace
 
joG said:
Maybe this is the punishment Kerry threatened the Russians with.

:peace
Click to expand...

Yeah, that occurred to me - but punishing the Russians is one thing, while punishing Assange basically amounts to saying he's an arm of the Russians, and thus a legitimate target. Furthermore, if the US govt were to engage in such an action, it has an obligation to disclose that such an operation occurred - especially when that operation is in support of a candidate in the US elections.

After all, did Kerry cut the NYT's internet when they leaked Trump's tax return? If NYT merely leaked-but-didn't-hack, then likewise the same is true for Assange/Wikileaks.
 
In a time of universal deception, speaking or publishing the truth is a radical act. Assange is speaking and publishing the truth, and TPTB sure as hell don't like it. Apparently, they are desperate enough to boldly cutoff his internet connection.

No surprise here.
 
I would not put it past this administration to do something like this.
They do not want the truth about all the back door dealings and other
crap Clinton has done while he was in the state house etc ... to become public knowledge.

Good thing the internet is huge and well Assange has more than one source he can use to release the information.
I have to agree they didn't stop the NYT from releasing and publishing an illegal tax return.
 
ludin said:
I would not put it past this administration to do something like this.
They do not want the truth about all the back door dealings and other
crap Clinton has done while he was in the state house etc ... to become public knowledge.

Good thing the internet is huge and well Assange has more than one source he can use to release the information.
I have to agree they didn't stop the NYT from releasing and publishing an illegal tax return.
Click to expand...

That part I bolded there is key....Obama doesn't want anything out there that tarnishes his supposed legacy, and that is so fragile right now with OC crumbling, Iran deal crumbling, and now with these leaks showing that he also downright lied to the American people boldly to their face about sending emails to Hillary on her private server using a pseudonym...This who bunch are criminally corrupt, and have done great damage to this country in many ways....
 
The Ecuador embassy is probably getting tired of this deadbeat moocher and stopped paying his Internet cable bill.
 
Assange says he lost access to the internet. What does that mean and what evidence is there of State involvement?
 
Its gotta be someone working with Clinton, who else but "wipe it with a cloth" Clinton would think that shutting off Assanges' internet access would stop him from leaking things? This doesn't do much but make it a little more difficult for him to access information. I would assume he is not in actual possession of any of the material in person and he just has to give the go ahead on another means as to when to leak more.
 
ajn678 said:
Its gotta be someone working with Clinton, who else but "wipe it with a cloth" Clinton would think that shutting off Assanges' internet access would stop him from leaking things? This doesn't do much but make it a little more difficult for him to access information. I would assume he is not in actual possession of any of the material in person and he just has to give the go ahead on another means as to when to leak more.
Click to expand...

You can download the insurance file.
It's encrypted, but if he's arrested or dies, the encryption key is released.
The file is alleged to contain about 250k documents and no one is really sure what's in it.
 
Wikileaks is an important tool in the war against lies.
 
j-mac said:
That part I bolded there is key....Obama doesn't want anything out there that tarnishes his supposed legacy, and that is so fragile right now with OC crumbling, Iran deal crumbling, and now with these leaks showing that he also downright lied to the American people boldly to their face about sending emails to Hillary on her private server using a pseudonym...This who bunch are criminally corrupt, and have done great damage to this country in many ways....
Click to expand...

ol I agree 100%. of course we knew that Obama was corrupt to begin with. what is worse is that now is the whole thing is exposed for what it is.
unfortunately there is no recourse for the American people. We cannot go and place these people under arrest or even charge them with crimes.
 
Napoleon said:
Assange says he lost access to the internet. What does that mean and what evidence is there of State involvement?
Click to expand...

It means that he might not have access to his deadman switch and everything could be dumped at one time in the next 48 hours.
 
I'm sure Obama ordered this at Hillary's insistence with help from a dark mole (probably a Mooslum) within the embassy and the Mexican Mafia.

Alex Jones probably has a story explaining it all.
 
The last debate is on Wednesday. It would be impossible for team Clinton to put prepare for issues if they don't know what is going to be leaked before the debate. Coincidence? Probably not.
 
NonoBadDog said:
The last debate is on Wednesday. It would be impossible for team Clinton to put prepare for issues if they don't know what is going to be leaked before the debate. Coincidence? Probably not.
Click to expand...

:lamo
 
If we removed the speculation and conspiracy theory from this forum from over the past month alone, I think 7/8 of the threads would be scrubbed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom