- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
- Messages
- 40,992
- Reaction score
- 55,257
- Location
- Houston Area, TX
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
So far there doesn't appear to be the smoking gun Assange alluded to. Maybe it is coming.
Judging from the reactions of a lot of people before, during and after literally everything Hilary Clinton has ever said, it'd be hard to come to a conclusion otherwise.
The idea that this is somehow magically going to vault Trump to victory is laughable, and that's the only reason y'all brought it up, so.....
I got an AP update on my phone, when I woke up not long ago.
It said Russia behind hacks.
They're shilling extra hard to cover up the contents.
I never said it would vault anyone to victory, Trumps a horrible candidate too.
A dud...
Are you in the habit of ignoring evidence and agreeing with someone that thinks you can only violate the law if it is a hard copy?
It's not like the woman doesn't have a long history of this kind of stuff. Nope.
You don't really believe that do you?
Being a politician?
Are you in the habit of trusting the authticity of illegally hacked documents from Russia?
Are you in the habit of trusting the authticity of illegally hacked documents from Russia?
To my knowledge, Wikileaks has never published false information.
The reason they often take so long to publish it, is because they verify the authenticity of the data they receive.
So you're happy with just the standard failure of a politician?
That desperate ploy might have a chance if Hillary had not earned millions from speeches to Wall Street Financial firms.
What, you thought they were paying her 220k a pop to hear her talk about yoga and Chelsea's wedding ?
Successful politician. That is why you hate her.
To your knowledge?
Successful? In what way are you defining that?
Free market. Gotta love it.
The Russians really don't want Hillary to be the president.
She is about to be the President of the United States.
She is about to be the President of the United States.
Do you have any information to the contrary?
I'm always willing to listen.
I just don't tolerate accusations like that without proof.
Plausibility doesn't equate to reality.
I am sorry, but you are the one wanting everyone to treat these documents as infallible and unaltered based on the credibility of an organization that is acting unlawfully and that is being supplied by a rival nation. You truly think I have the burden of proof?
Lying Politicians with two seperate agendas, a BS agenda to appease naive American voters, and a real agenda to enrich the 1%.
Nothing to love about that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?