• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wife of ex-Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin reportedly filing for divorce

Possible. But seems odd timing if that was the case. Convenient that it will also net her money that would otherwise be used to fund lawsuits and be paid out in the event that those lawsuits are lost.

Stop making excuses for him. The timing has been explained.
 
Stop making excuses for him. The timing has been explained.

Who has excused him? Let me know how long this divorce takes. if it's over quick because he didn't contest it, that will be telling.
 
Who has excused him? Let me know how long this divorce takes. if it's over quick because he didn't contest it, that will be telling.

"Maybe his wife really loves him and she's just protecting the family financially."

No.

He's scum.
 

I think that she could just be appalled by what he did. We don’t know his and we are. She was married to him.
 
2005....this is just like finding dirt on any other victim of the cops, isn't it?
 
"Maybe his wife really loves him and she's just protecting the family financially."

No.

He's scum.

Why would him being scum have any relation to her loving him? Why would love factor into divorce? She married him, who knows why. Convenient that she will profit off of the divorce, and avoid financial ruin.
 

they have kids from what I understand.
 
they have kids from what I understand.

I understand that they don't have kids together, but there are kids in the household. Perhaps from her and her late previous husband.
 

2005 by the Daily mail is your source? for $42 come on now...that sounds like an accounting error and not a string of checks and from 15 years ago? No, she isn't accused of any wrongdoing.
 
What?




Why are you attacking her?

I don't pretend to know how people feel about each other. People have complex feelings, and if they married I assume it was a good choice for them at the time.

Divorce, on the other hand, is usually about the money.
 
2005 by the Daily mail is your source? for $42 come on now...that sounds like an accounting error and not a string of checks and from 15 years ago? No, she isn't accused of any wrongdoing.

Can you believe the poor wife of a scumbag racist murderer cop is suffering character assassination by people trying to protect him?

It's like people can't see what they do.
 
What?




Why are you attacking her?

How is that attacking her? She's absolutely doing the best thing fiscally for her family.
 
they have kids from what I understand.

I believe her children are from a previous marriage. The family statement asked that her children be 'left alone', but reports also say that they have not had children together.
 

Minnesota is a community property state...half of their assets would be subject to the lawsuit for wrongful death, regardless of the divorce...however, once divorced she can now be called to testify against him.
 
How is that attacking her? She's absolutely doing the best thing fiscally for her family.

Or maybe she honestly wants a divorce. Maybe she's not lying or cheating or stealing. Maybe she's taking her opportunity to escape the scumbag.

But you gotta believe she's evil, has an ulterior motive (which technically makes the husband a victim), greed. Dunno why that's your position, but it's ****ed up.
 
I don't pretend to know how people feel about each other. People have complex feelings, and if they married I assume it was a good choice for them at the time.

Divorce, on the other hand, is usually about the money.

I remained married 18 years to a scumbag abuser...it wasn't because it was good...it was because I was protecting my child.
 
Why would him being scum have any relation to her loving him? Why would love factor into divorce? She married him, who knows why. Convenient that she will profit off of the divorce, and avoid financial ruin.

um, she will get half of whatever is left....first debts have to be paid...you do not know what their assets are...you are assuming.
 

Dude... you're so off base. Why do you think she's lying, or cheating or stealing? No evidence of that. They're divorcing to protect assets for her and the kids. They may not like each other either, who knows. Why would divorcing make her evil? Divorce is not an evil thing, let it go. You seem a bit caught up in their divorce, but I promise you she's not evil, and divorcing is ok, no matter the reason.
 
um, she will get half of whatever is left....first debts have to be paid...you do not know what their assets are...you are assuming.

Yes. Best to divorce before large legal debts are racked up. And who knows if she'll get half; maybe she'll be entitled to much more, having to raise kids until they are adults.
 

You're claiming she wants a divorce for financial reasons. That's not honest on her part. That's lying about why she wants a divorce in order to gain financially. So it's cheating and stealing. It also technically makes the husband a victim.

So, in your mind, she's evil and greedy and the husband is a victim.

Why?
 
2005 by the Daily mail is your source? for $42 come on now...that sounds like an accounting error and not a string of checks and from 15 years ago? No, she isn't accused of any wrongdoing.
I think the point is that his wife committed a similar offense to the guy her husband killed, but nobody pinned her down to the ground and put their kneecap on her neck until she died.

Ja sam Baba Yaga [emoji328]
 

Why would the husband be the victim? He has to agree to the divorce. It's a mutual thing. They are agreeing that it would be better for her to not be financially liable for his actions. Sounds like teamwork to me.

Again, if he contests the divorce and drags it out for several months or years, then it's likely that he is a controlling scumbag. If he signs it quick, seems like it was agreeable to both parties, no victims.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…