• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why you personally should not carry.

You have a better plan to keep out oppressed starving people from borders that are impossible to secure? Do tell.

40% enter legally by plane and simply overstay their visas.

Factor in those that arrive legally by other means (boat, car, etc) and you'll be spending tens of billions to (hopefully) stop a relatively small number of people

Save those billions that are going to be hosed on this thing and fund more patrols with better technology

Furthermore, spend money on finding the 11.1 million that are already in the US (with 86% being resident for more than 5 years) and also hammer the people employing them

Simple
 
Which part of right did you not understand? It is not compulsory, it is a choice not to be a victim.

You just love hyperbole to justify your decisions. Nobody here cares what they are, they only care about the miscreants and social outcasts that want to remove others rights. Is that what you want? Why and by what right do you seek to do so?

Is honouring others rights to much for your fear of guns?

Answering the OP's question, ever heard of it?
 
40% enter legally by plane and simply overstay their visas.

Factor in those that arrive legally by other means (boat, car, etc) and you'll be spending tens of billions to (hopefully) stop a relatively small number of people

Save those billions that are going to be hosed on this thing and fund more patrols with better technology

Furthermore, spend money on finding the 11.1 million that are already in the US (with 86% being resident for more than 5 years) and also hammer the people employing them

Simple

Tell your local congressman then and see what they say.

What better technology?

How many more patrols?

How much will be needed to round up 11.1 million

Let's see how simple it is.
 
Answering the OP's question, ever heard of it?

Idiotic deflection.

Did you write this crap or not?

Originally Posted by Astonished
I have enough to carry already. Cell phone, credit cards, license, cash, keys, I'm going to add a gun to all that? And bullets? Or are you supposed to carry a loaded gun? That sounds safe. Where are we, the wild west? Are there indians to kill?

I repeat

Which part of right did you not understand? It is not compulsory, it is a choice not to be a victim.

You just love hyperbole to justify your decisions. Nobody here cares what they are, they only care about the miscreants and social outcasts that want to remove others rights. Is that what you want? Why and by what right do you seek to do so?

Is honouring others rights to much for your fear of guns?
 
Well now

You are babbling

Gun laws 1996

No mass shootings since then

Nil, nada, zip, zilch, naaaaaathing

Your history is ..............?

Go to bed

Here is a bit of advice if gun control told you something it is a lie and you are wasting our time as well as yours posing it. We have seen every claim gun control has made and have shot it down.

Are you foolish enough to suggest that mass murderers only use guns? Ever heard of substitution? Are you foolish enough to claim if one removes motor vehicles motor vehicle death will go down and expect to be taken seriously? Did gun control not make promises of mass murders and crime reducing? You do not check anything before believing or posting do you.

Since you have already been corrected I shall not repeat. I will say learn to read though

Well tell me a bed time story of where the proof of this law you claim is that it has worked. It's like pulling teeth hare, is English not your first language or do you not understand multi-part questions?

I suggest you look to see if anything you claim has been refuted first to save embarrassment. So far you are covered in it.
 
Here is a bit of advice if gun control told you something it is a lie and you are wasting our time as well as yours posing it. We have seen every claim gun control has made and have shot it down.

Are you foolish enough to suggest that mass murderers only use guns? Ever heard of substitution? Are you foolish enough to claim if one removes motor vehicles motor vehicle death will go down and expect to be taken seriously? Did gun control not make promises of mass murders and crime reducing? You do not check anything before believing or posting do you.

Since you have already been corrected I shall not repeat. I will say learn to read though

Well tell me a bed time story of where the proof of this law you claim is that it has worked. It's like pulling teeth hare, is English not your first language or do you not understand multi-part questions?

I suggest you look to see if anything you claim has been refuted first to save embarrassment. So far you are covered in it.

Australia - look it up
 
Australia - look it up

Victims of violent crime (n per year)

Murders, higher for four of the next five years. Sexual assaults up 40% over the next 10 years. Armed robberies up 80% in the five years after 1996. And you still had US definition mass shootings and mass murders with guns. Your homicide rate declined at the same rate as the US since 1996.

What am I looking for again?
 
Victims of violent crime (n per year)

Murders, higher for four of the next five years. Sexual assaults up 40% over the next 10 years. Armed robberies up 80% in the five years after 1996. And you still had US definition mass shootings and mass murders with guns. Your homicide rate declined at the same rate as the US since 1996.

What am I looking for again?

Shooting deaths halved and have stayed at that level despite a doubling in the number of guns

In other news, humans kill each other

Who knew?
 
Shooting deaths halved and have stayed at that level despite a doubling in the number of guns

In other news, humans kill each other

Who knew?

since the Clinton crime family's attempted rape of the second amendment, the number of semi auto rifles in the USA have skyrocketed. Many people started buying them up in order to have them available if Obama or Hillary tried to ban them. MILLIONS of normal capacity magazines (20-30 round AR 15 magazines, 30 round AK magazines, 17 round GLOCK 17 magazines, and 32 round AR 15 9mm magazines) were bought up by forward looking patriots who remembered what happened when the clinton crime family bill of 1994 was enacted. yet gun deaths are going down despite all these "weapons of war" (Jet's claim not the claim of those of us who actually understand the issue) being in circulation
 
since the Clinton crime family's attempted rape of the second amendment, the number of semi auto rifles in the USA have skyrocketed. Many people started buying them up in order to have them available if Obama or Hillary tried to ban them. MILLIONS of normal capacity magazines (20-30 round AR 15 magazines, 30 round AK magazines, 17 round GLOCK 17 magazines, and 32 round AR 15 9mm magazines) were bought up by forward looking patriots who remembered what happened when the clinton crime family bill of 1994 was enacted. yet gun deaths are going down despite all these "weapons of war" (Jet's claim not the claim of those of us who actually understand the issue) being in circulation

I'm actually on record here as saying that I didnt think gun control would work in the US as it's the legislative equivalent of locking the stable after the horse has bolted plus gun ownership is engrained in your culture, NRA too powerful, etc etc

In any event, gun control wont stop gang members killing each other in Chicago as they are hardly likely to comply with them anyway.

IMO, "the problem" needs to be attacked from a different angle.

As an example, we had a problem with outlaw bikie gangs in the state where I live so the government enacted new legislation and gave extreme power to law enforcement officers.

Result was no more outlaw bikie gangs
 
Last edited:
Shooting deaths halved and have stayed at that level despite a doubling in the number of guns

In other news, humans kill each other

Who knew?

Gosh the US homicide rate has halved to its lowest rate since the 1950s, and that's with the expiry of the AWB and 10 million "assault weapons". Sadly, our rope suicide rate has almost doubled since 1999, killing more people than were murdered by guns in the US. I guess we should ask Australia about rope confiscations.
 
As an example, we had a problem with outlaw bikie gangs in the state where I live so the government enacted new legislation and gave extreme power to law enforcement officers.

Result was no more outlaw bikie gangs

Can you elaborate on the methods used and powers granted? I assume that the bikies weren't of a protected class of some kind or another.
 
I'm actually on record here as saying that I didnt think gun control would work in the US as it's the legislative equivalent of locking the stable after the horse has bolted plus gun ownership is engrained in your culture, NRA too powerful, etc etc

In any event, gun control wont stop gang members killing each other in Chicago as they are hardly likely to comply with them anyway.

IMO, "the problem" needs to be attacked from a different angle.

As an example, we had a problem with outlaw bikie gangs in the state where I live so the government enacted new legislation and gave extreme power to law enforcement officers.

Result was no more outlaw bikie gangs

1) being a gun owner is not a crime

2) if you are talking about suspending constitutional rights for gang bangers, the courts won't support that

3) if you are suggesting police violate the constitutional rights of gun owners, most police won't do it-those that do will probably have a short tenure as police officers since the courts-both conservative and liberal will crush them
 
Gosh the US homicide rate has halved to its lowest rate since the 1950s, and that's with the expiry of the AWB and 10 million "assault weapons". Sadly, our rope suicide rate has almost doubled since 1999, killing more people than were murdered by guns in the US. I guess we should ask Australia about rope confiscations.

I think your argument will tie the gun banners in knots
 
The Blatant Irrational Lie about gun banning will be RESISTED and not be an issue in 2018.

Mayor Buttigieg just hit a home run over trump the chickenhawk chicken**** draft-dodger who had the gall to actually attack those who served over their service.

Shame on the GOP .
 
The Blatant Irrational Lie about gun banning will be RESISTED and not be an issue in 2018.

When you talk about the Blatant Irrational Lie about gun banning, are you referring to the recent court case under discussion where "assault weapons" were banned in Maryland?
 
The Blatant Irrational Lie about gun banning will be RESISTED and not be an issue in 2018.

Mayor Buttigieg just hit a home run over trump the chickenhawk chicken**** draft-dodger who had the gall to actually attack those who served over their service.

Shame on the GOP .

the democraps banned lots of guns in california and Maryland. what are you talking about?
 
Can you elaborate on the methods used and powers granted? I assume that the bikies weren't of a protected class of some kind or another.

No

Just your run of the mill Bandido, Comanchero, Hells Angel, etc

Tough penalties for criminal gang members - The Queensland Cabinet and Ministerial Directory

Look innocent enough on paper but in practice they were an absolute bitch as it basically gave the police the power to detain, enter, search, confiscate, etc without a warrant

Furthermore, the Queensland police are notoriously ruthless and even more so when openly challenged e.g. a gang leader issued a statement telling the world that they ran the state not the government

In the end, they crushed them in less than a year as gang members literally could not have a cup of coffee together without risking jail time
 
Last edited:
When did you last have one of yer guns banned ?

Never, but I've also never been raped, had an abortion or had my vote suppressed, but that doesn't mean that none of these are happening.

Have you read anything about the Kolbe decision currently under discussion here?
 
When did you last have one of yer guns banned ?

1986, I cannot buy any select fire rifle in violation of the second amendment.

do you know what was the evidence in support of that ban? NOTHING-an asshole named Hughes was upset a pro gun was going to pass so he tried to derail it with this idiocy.
 
Australia - look it up

Proof by asinine assertion is not acceptable.

I know where Australia is. I don't need to look it up, you do. You also have not explained New Zealand yet. Please get to t soon and stop messing about.

I asked where is your proof Australia is a gun control success. I also made comment about making sure whatever you offered had not been refuted.

I want a list of success for the simple reason there are tens of thousand gun control laws in the world. Only an idiot would think one success was representative of something. How about at least half? I am willing to bet you cannot find one. What does that say about gun control?

Are you trying to claim your belief is factual because you say so?
 
Back
Top Bottom