Explain the so-called flaw in pointing out the fact the Democrats and front groups are flooding District courts with an unprecedented number of political lawsuits. Your refusal to deal with fact is a flaw in your argument.
The number of lawsuits is a key indicator of the Democrat strategy. The flat earthers in the discussion are the ones screaming "Constitution" while promoting the anti Constitutional tactic.
Your refusal to recognize the Democrat tactic of political warfare through mass lawsuits is just silly.
Democrats are pursuing a variant of the Acorn strategy of flooding Secretary of State offices with bogus voter registration applications knowing the ones that get through will be almost impossible to remove just like legal precedent.
My point is recognizing the flood of political lawsuits is a deliberate strategy to transfer power from the Executive and Congtessional branches to the judiciary.
Is that a conspiracy? You betcha. Radical Democrats don't take kindly to losing elections.
Nowhere is that more true than the flawed premise Democrats have the slightest interest in Constitutional governance with this mass filing of lawsuits.
Claiming Democrats aren't animated by incandescent hatred for President Trump is like claiming the Earth is flat.
The problem is that Trump’s orders and policies are illegal. He isn’t just doing one. If he was a single lawsuit would suffice. However he is doing dozens, hundreds.
This is where Court Precedents come in. The question for this thread, Birthright Citizenship. It has been settled law for a century and a half. If you want to challenge it then there are a couple ways to do so. You could have Congress pass a law defining Citizenship. We didn’t do that did we? You could start an Amendment defining it your way. Nope. Didn’t go that route either. What we did was Trump using an Executive Order and instructing the Federal Government to operate that way now.
That is blatantly illegal. It is Unconstitutional.
This is like a guy complaining that the cops are giving him a speeding ticket every day. He is speeding every day. He is getting caught breaking the law. It isn’t a conspiracy by the Cops to harass him. He is doing it.
Trump is doing the same thing. Firing people he has no authority to fire. The Courts get the motion and check the law. Sure enough, Trump can’t fire them by law. Oh it is a Democrat Conspiracy.
Stop speeding. Drive at the speed limit. Obey the law. Isn’t that a battle cry of the RW? Obey the law?
The cases defining this sort of thing are well known. They are called Precedents. The case of Heller defines what restrictions can be placed on the Second Amendment as an example. Seems simple enough. Trump is ignoring those Precedents. Trump is willingly and knowingly doing what is illegal.
Like the Speeder in our example. It isn’t the Cops fault the guy is getting tickets. It isn’t a conspiracy. He has a lead foot and is unwilling or unable to drive within the rules. If Trump was obeying the laws I might agree. But he isn’t, and we know that because the District Courts, Appeals Courts, and Supreme Court keep upholding the decisions against him.
It’s the old saying. If you meet an Asshole first thing in the morning. He is the Asshole. If you meet nothing but Assholes, it might be you who is the Asshole.
