Why The Gun Control Debate is Over

[RF667799]

Having lost a point in this debate, you arrogantly shift it to another and demand that I explain motives that should already be obvious to you. Good job trying to never play defense, but it will not work for you here.

Your motive was obvious. That being your attempt to apply to me, what you in your partisan bubble consider to be a derogatory term.

I explained it from the beginning, and despite your pantomime of objecting, you have no alternate explanation.

It is humorous that you claim your intent should be obvious to me, but try to simultaneously hold that your intent is known only to you.

 

[Phys251]

Your motive was obvious. That being your attempt to apply to me, what you in your partisan bubble consider to be a derogatory term.

I explained it from the beginning, and despite your pantomime of objecting, you have no alternate explanation.

It is humorous that you claim your intent should be obvious to me, but try to simultaneously hold that your intent is known only to you.

There you go again doubling-down on falsely impugning my motives while not addressing the substance of the meme.

I suppose this is what you do to try and fail to feel better when you are badly losing a debate.

 

[RF667799]

There you go again doubling-down on falsely impugning my motives while not addressing the substance of the meme.

I suppose this is what you do to try and fail to feel better when you are badly losing a debate.

You've not explained how the substance of the meme is applicable.

You don't know my motives! You're no mind-reader!
AND...
My motives should be obvious!

Do it again.

 

[Phys251]

You've not explained how the substance of the meme is applicable.

You want me to break it down for you in simple English that I know you're capable of understanding? No, you're just playing the la-la-can't-hear-you game.

You don't know my motives! You're no mind-reader!
AND...
My motives should be obvious!
Do it again.

Keep making my point for me. I'm loving this.

 

[RF667799]

You want me to break it down for you in simple English that I know you're capable of understanding?

Why make a threat you're incapable or unwilling to carry out?

But yes. I think I've requested a couple times that you provide your alternate explanation of intent.

Since you object to my explanation of intent, while claiming the intent should be obvious to me.

No, you're just playing the la-la-can't-hear-you game.



Keep making my point for me. I'm loving this.

Well sure you are, in a way. You have my attention even though you're apprehensive at being able to extricate yourself.

 

[Phys251]

Why make a threat you're incapable or unwilling to carry out?

But yes. I think I've requested a couple times that you provide your alternate explanation of intent.

Since you object to my explanation of intent, while claiming the intent should be obvious to me.




Well sure you are, in a way. You have my attention even though you're apprehensive at being able to extricate yourself.

I love this. All you had to do was address the meme itself, and you could have saved yourself so much embarrassment.

Instead, you keep on running a foolish errand of trying to impugn my motives while not addressing the meme, thus implying that it was right.

Your next post to prove me right will be?

 

[RF667799]

I love this. All you had to do was address the meme itself, and you could have saved yourself so much embarrassment.

I did address the meme. You used it as a way to apply to me, what you consider to be a derogatory term.

Instead, you keep on running a foolish errand of trying to impugn my motives while not addressing the meme, thus implying that it was right.

Non sequitur. You're not right because I had tuna for lunch either.

You said your motives should be obvious to me. Yet you reject my assessment of your motives. All the while being reluctant to reveal your motives.

Your next post to prove me right will be?

You've not even arrived at a rational point. Don't be afraid. You won't get in trouble for revealing that you in fact had no loftier ambition than to call me a Republican- which you consider derogatory.

 

[Phys251]

I did address the meme.

Where? Where did you falsify it? Can you point me to the post?

 

[RF667799]

Where? Where did you falsify it? Can you point me to the post?

And now the avoidance tactic of removing all content from the oppositions post.

No new tricks in the bag.

 

[Phys251]

And now the avoidance tactic of removing all content from the oppositions post.

No new tricks in the bag.

You claimed that you addressed the meme. Are you lying about that too, or did you actually address it somewhere? This is your chance to save what little face you have left.

 

[RF667799]

You claimed that you addressed the meme. Are you lying about that too, or did you actually address it somewhere? This is your chance to save what little face you have left.

I did address it several times. The most recent time, you edited when you quoted me.

 

[Phys251]

I did address it several times. The most recent time, you edited when you quoted me.

Where? Point out the first time you actually refuted it. All you've done is a hilariously awful attempt at bullying.

 

[RF667799]

Where? Point out the first time you actually refuted it. All you've done is a hilariously awful attempt at bullying.

You're going to play the victim card when you initiated this by tossing what you consider to be a derogatory at me?!?

Goddamn what a limited repertoire. Everything comes out of the bag is dusty, rusty, or wore the **** out.

 

[Phys251]

You're going to play the victim card when you initiated this by tossing what you consider to be a derogatory at me?!?

Goddamn what a limited repertoire. Everything comes out of the bag is dusty, rusty, or wore the **** out.

Cut the bullying act; it's lame and feckless. Point out the post where you refuted the meme.

If it exists.

 

[RF667799]

Cut the bullying act; it's lame and feckless. Point out the post where you refuted the meme.

If it exists.

No need to refute anything. Thats just how you're trying to deflect. Your intent was nothing contained within whatever of substance might be in the meme. The meme was just your way of communicating a derogatory.


I gave my assessment of your obvious intent in posting the meme.

You said your intent was known only to you, but that it was also obvious.

You've done nothing to correct my assessment of the obvious intent in posting the meme.

And now you're reduced to whining that you're being bullied. Such a victim.

 

[Phys251]

No need to refute anything.

Ah, now the truth comes out! You never refuted the meme. You have been lying about "addressing" it multiple times. You're just worried that it says something you don't like, and you can't handle that.

Thats just how you're trying to deflect. Your intent was nothing contained within whatever of substance might be in the meme. The meme was just your way of communicating a derogatory.


I gave my assessment of your obvious intent in posting the meme.

You said your intent was known only to you, but that it was also obvious.

You've done nothing to correct my assessment of the obvious intent in posting the meme.

And now you're reduced to whining that you're being bullied. Such a victim.

your bullying tactics aren't intimidating, they're cute. But sad. Like you think they're going to get you anywhere.

 

[RF667799]

Ah, now the truth comes out! You never refuted the meme.

I never claimed to. In fact, I said early on that it wasn't necessary. Try to keep up.

You have been lying about "addressing" it multiple times.

Those aren't synonyms, "addressing" and "refuting".

You're just worried that it says something you don't like, and you can't handle that.

The intent was to say something you take as a derogatory that you hoped I wouldn't like.

I guess you were unintentionally correct about the truth coming out.

your bullying tactics aren't intimidating, they're cute. But sad. Like you think they're going to get you anywhere.

Three times in a row trying the bullying card.

From someone who initiated the conversation by calling me a name.

 

[Phys251]

I never claimed to. In fact, I said early on that it wasn't necessary. Try to keep up.

You said you addressed it.

Those aren't synonyms, "addressing" and "refuting".



The intent was to say something you take as a derogatory that you hoped I wouldn't like.

I guess you were unintentionally correct about the truth coming out.



Three times in a row trying the bullying card.

From someone who initiated the conversation by calling me a name.

 

[tobytone]

And it, the gun culture, teaches kids lessons they couldn't learn elsewhere. A girl in the Uvalde school, for example, took blood off her fallen classmate and smeared herself with it to fool the shooter. You can't learn skills like that anywhere else.

100 points for most dramatic reply so far. 'the gun culture' teaches little girls to trick shooters by spreading blood on their face. I support the 2nd amendment so I guess I'm part of 'the gun culture'. You're a disgusting human being making stupid comment like that. It's not particularly surprising, especially here but still gross. How about you tell us what gun law you would like to see to prevent tragedies like this from ever happening again.

 

[Phys251]

100 points for most dramatic reply so far. 'the gun culture' teaches little girls to trick shooters by spreading blood on their face. I support the 2nd amendment so I guess I'm part of 'the gun culture'. You're a disgusting human being making stupid comment like that. It's not particularly surprising, especially here but still gross. How about you tell us what gun law you would like to see to prevent tragedies like this from ever happening again.

Explain what was factually incorrect about @Grand Mal's post.

 

[RF667799]

You said you addressed it.

I said that. You are correct.

No more cards in the bag, I suppose.

 

[Phys251]

I said that. You are correct.


No more cards in the bag, I suppose.

Projection. Your tactics are getting boring. If you want to run around the chessboard and knock over all the pieces, I should stop picking them back up.

 

[Grand Mal]

100 points for most dramatic reply so far. 'the gun culture' teaches little girls to trick shooters by spreading blood on their face. I support the 2nd amendment so I guess I'm part of 'the gun culture'. You're a disgusting human being making stupid comment like that.

That's not a comment. That's reporting something that happened.
It's the event that's disgusting. How do you not get that?

It's not particularly surprising, especially here but still gross. How about you tell us what gun law you would like to see to prevent tragedies like this from ever happening again.

How about you tell us what's happening in your avatar? What are you celebrating?

 

[RF667799]

Explain what was factually incorrect about @Grand Mal's post.

That what he described was something due to the unspecified actions of some shadowy "gun culture". And that it is absolutely unique to the US.

Basically he made some assertions he didn't seem interested in supporting.

 

[RF667799]

Projection. Your tactics are getting boring. If you want to run around the chessboard and knock over all the pieces, I should stop picking them back up.

Oh goodie! You still had some rusty cliche left in your bag!