Why is the uncovering of the Epstein files so important?

[bongsaway]

Why are you trying to convict Trump without any proof he was even there on the island?
Oh I get it... you hate Trump and are just making up unproven allegations to satisfy your hatred.
If I was a democrat, thank heaven I am not, but if I was I would more worried about all of Epstein's democrat friends, which he had plenty, (and yes Slick Willie was one) that will be exposed if the judge unredacted the files or the judge reversed his decision to release the grand jury testimony. But you are right there were a lot of women (prostitutes?) on the island who were not underage. In fact a lot of prostitutes who are underage for varies reasons.

I stopped after your you hate trump bullshit

 

[ElChupacabra]

Bingo

You called Bingo but didn't have the right numbers. I know it's easy to want to just blame Democrats and The Left™, but the fact of the matter is you have members of the Trump base who started all of this when he told them there was nothing to see here despite him campaigning on revealing everything. What's funny is he's been busy releasing other things with ease thinking he'd ease the pressure, but it just made these same folks angrier he hasn't released what they want with similar ease.

 

[ElChupacabra]

Didn’t these files exist when Joe was president? Does anyone seriously think that if there had been anything incriminating against Trump he wouldn’t have released it? Democrats have been on a nine-year crusade against Trump. If the object were truth and justice, why did that only start once Trump became president?

Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files and told his base he would release that information. Pat Bondi said she had them on her desk back in February and they were getting the final look over, then radio silence until Trump told his base there was nothing to see and they flipped out on him.

 

[Real blank]

Because it’s a thing now and we have to go through it.Its like Britney Spears.

 

[jaypatriot]

Just a gang of rich and powerful people raping children, WHAT’S THE BIG DEAL LIBS?!?

This is where we are now?

No. We are at the point where Trump-haters are using the Epstein story to attack Trump without knowing what his involvement with the Island was. He was not president if and when he was there.

 

[jaypatriot]

Not my feeling. Proven facts.

It is obvious that some Trump supporters are incapable of ANY objectivity.

It is hilarious to think that a Trump supporter would imply supporting due process when Trump has initiated unilateral and authoritarian actions which are intended to subvert and avoid due process by actions addressing programs involving immigration, naturalization, healthcare, education, foreign aid, commerce, climate change, civil rights, national archives, government accountability and recordkeeping, to name just a few.

Does that mean he won't win your vote if he runs for president again?

 

[Phys251]

No. We are at the point where Trump-haters are using the Epstein story to attack Trump without knowing what his involvement with the Island was. He was not president if and when he was there.

The "la la can't hear you" game is a great look when you're defending a potentially pedophilic president.

 

[Ahlevah]

Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files and told his base he would release that information. Pat Bondi said she had them on her desk back in February and they were getting the final look over, then radio silence until Trump told his base there was nothing to see and they flipped out on him.

Yes, because the people didn’t need to see everything until Trump became president. I guess the Democratic plan was better, eh? Just sit on everything so you don’t embarrass your friends?

 

[Absentglare]

No. We are at the point where Trump-haters are using the Epstein story to attack Trump without knowing what his involvement with the Island was. He was not president if and when he was there.

So you want to pretend the entire mountain of evidence associating Trump with Epstein was manufactured by “Trump-haters” even though it almost all predates his first time in any public office?

How did they do that, exactly?

 

[ElChupacabra]

Yes, because the people didn’t need to see everything until Trump became president.

The people who really wanted to see everything were part of Trump's conspiracy nutter base, and he chose to tell them he would. He made that a part of his campaign rhetoric.

I guess the Democratic plan was better, eh? Just sit on everything so you don’t embarrass your friends?

Did Harris campaign on releasing the files?

 

[Spock]

The subject matter is revolting.
But the underlying motivation is political ammunition for the Dems who see it as a political weapon to undermine Trump and his Administration.
Anything beyond that is pure hypocrisy and false pretenses.

Are you arguing that alleging hypocrisy, spinning behavior that is controversial, generating unproven political innuendo, or spinning a news story to the benefit of a political party or politician is intolerable to you, a Trump supporter?

 

[Spock]

Does that mean he won't win your vote if he runs for president again?

I am happy to support any of his behavior that could reliably lead to a prison term.

 

[Noodlegawd]

But they will. And you can complain about it all you want.

That response was almost as pointless as Democrats whining about the Epstein files.

 

[Spock]

Didn’t these files exist when Joe was president? Does anyone seriously think that if there had been anything incriminating against Trump he wouldn’t have released it? Democrats have been on a nine-year crusade against Trump. If the object were truth and justice, why did that only start once Trump became president?

Some problems are too deeply rooted in Republican affection for wealth and celebrity that no amount of effort at objective analysis will be believed.

 

[Spock]

Go bother someone else?
Are you playing mod?
How is replying to a comment you made on a public message board a bother for you?

If there was evidence that Trump had sex with underage girls or had sex traffickedall young women, would you still support him?

There will be endless excuses and misdirection. Trump, like his supporters, will deny and deflect every criticism.

 

[jaypatriot]

I am happy to support any of his behavior that could reliably lead to a prison term.

You and millions of others don't like him because took over the first South Park episode of the new season.
He wants to dominate everything!

 

[T25]

The Biden Regime didn't want to release the information and now it appears that neither does Team Trump. What could be so bad that BOTH parties are opposed to its release?

 

[jaypatriot]

Are you arguing that alleging hypocrisy, spinning behavior that is controversial, generating unproven political innuendo, or spinning a news story to the benefit of a political party or politician is intolerable to you, a Trump supporter?

The GOP does that (hypocrisy) so much better than the Dems.
Maybe you're jealous of the because the Dems just can't get it right.
Relating to the theme of this thread:
Too many Dems defend their quixotic quest for the Epstein files by vowing that they are after justice for the "innocent".
Now that is most hypocritical. Their primary goal is to get Trump.

 

[SavannahMann]

At this point it is really irrelevant. Trump's Minions in the DOJ, and since they fired anyone who wasn't a Card Carrying Republican already, that is everyone really. Those folks at the DOJ are scrubbing those files, burning everything that has Trump in it. So releasing the files will be bad for Democrats who are out of office, but nothing much for those in office. The only question at this point is who are they inserting into the files. I'd put money on Pence, because he didn't stay loyal to Trump.

 

[jaypatriot]

So you want to pretend the entire mountain of evidence associating Trump with Epstein was manufactured by “Trump-haters” even though it almost all predates his first time in any public office?

How did they do that, exactly?

If course Trump was associated with Epstein long before he became president.
And yes he socialized with Epstein. That is common knowledge.
There is no evidence of Trump going to Epstein's island and no knowledge of him cavorting with underage girls.

Now try to spin that to make Trump a sexual abuser of underage females.

 

[jaypatriot]

The "la la can't hear you" game is a great look when you're defending a potentially pedophilic president.

Just what is a "potentially pedophilic president."?
Is that like being a little pregnant?

 

[T25]

If course Trump was associated with Epstein long before he became president.
And yes he socialized with Epstein. That is common knowledge.
There is no evidence of Trump going to Epstein's island and no knowledge of him cavorting with underage girls.

Now try to spin that to make Trump a sexual abuser of underage females.

Leftists don't need evidence, let alone proof, to spew claims against Trump just like all of the truth and facts in the world will ever compel them to acknowledge that they got conned and suckered by the traitorous Obama.

 

[Spock]

You and millions of others don't like him because took over the first South Park episode of the new season.
He wants to dominate everything!

No. Trump is a grifter who has conned the gullible and ignorant.

 

[Spock]

The GOP does that (hypocrisy) so much better than the Dems.
Maybe you're jealous of the because the Dems just can't get it right.
Relating to the theme of this thread:
Too many Dems defend their quixotic quest for the Epstein files by vowing that they are after justice for the "innocent".
Now that is most hypocritical. Their primary goal is to get Trump.

Now you are endorsing the behavior you vilified. Get you message straight because it smells like hypocrisy.

 

[Absentglare]

If course Trump was associated with Epstein long before he became president.
And yes he socialized with Epstein. That is common knowledge.
There is no evidence of Trump going to Epstein's island and no knowledge of him cavorting with underage girls.

Now try to spin that to make Trump a sexual abuser of underage females.

There is evidence, there was a woman who testified that she was raped by Trump and Epstein. That’s evidence.

Then there’s the fact that he already admitted to being on Epstein’s list. There’s all the pictures he has with Epstein. There’s the statement about him knowing Epstein liked young girls. There’s the other statement joking that Epstein lets neighborhood kids swim in his pool. There’s the fact that be barged in on nude underage girls at his beauty pageants. There’s the grab em by the ***** comment. There’s the fact that he raped E Jean Carrol as well as his ex-wife.

That’s all evidence. You’re just choosing to discount all of it.