- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Messages
- 10,897
- Reaction score
- 12,343
- Location
- Maine
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
What the actual **** is wrong with this person? Taboo only in the 1990's? Jesus ****ing christ.
What the actual **** is wrong with this person? Taboo only in the 1990's? Jesus ****ing christ.
There are two kinds of people:What is the point of your open-ended question?
This is easy, there are too many D's on the list too. Its shameful that anyone working this case should take that bullshit into consideration.And you do realize that the Biden Administration could have released any and all information, and never did. Why do you think that is?
I don't know? You tell us, you crafted this huge Cope of a thread.Do you really think this Epstein bullshit story is really going to bleed that far into 2026? And, even into 2028?
Yeah "sometimes"* Trump Devotion Syndrome has no bounds.Sometimes Trump Derangement Syndrome has no bounds.
If it has anything to do with Trump, anyone involved in that must also be bad.
Ok, come on. Now you are just feigning being obtuse.I do not understand that.
How are the R's using it to drive their MAGA base? Drive them where?
Toward greater support for Trump? Or to attack him because he did not do what he said he was going to do?
You claim to understand their objective,
Keep it short and tell me.
That whole answer he gave smelt a lot like a Dershowitz confession/justification of it being ok to bugger little girls.When you know Epstein is trafficking in young girls do you want to take the chance the 15 year old you were with a wink told she was 18 is actually 18.
Or more to the point when you know Epstein is trafficking young girls why go anywhere with him at all. Why hang out with a rapist and pimp?
Epsteins island only existed because it trafficked in young girls, if the girls were of legal age they wouldn't need Epstein to find them, they could find a regular service.
Every one who went to that island knew what was occurring
That what I love about religious people. They can be the worst that society has to offer, but as long as their Sky Fairy is "with them" then, welp, they good!Nope! I worship God. And I fear nothing. God is with me.![]()
When you don't have a reasonable answer, you accuse someone of being obtuse. Good tactic. Everyone is supposed to understand your loaded question.Ok, come on. Now you are just feigning being obtuse.
Kind of a silly poll answers.The clamor for the release of the so-called Epstein files has reached a fever pitch.
My feeling is the vast majority of those demanding to see "the files" want to see how much the GOP will be damaged by the data especially since the mid-terms next year are critical for the Democrats' success at the polls.
The foremost goal of course is to hurt Trump, the duly elected president of this country.
To me, it is all about political fortunes for next year and very little to do with "protecting the innocent" whoever they are.
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on Friday said the Jeffrey Epstein client list is "sitting on my desk right now" and she is reviewing the JFK and MLK files as well after President Donald Trump's earlier directives.
"It's sitting on my desk right now to review," Bondi told 'America Reports' host John Roberts on Friday. "That's been a directive by President Trump."
Why would his own AG want that? And trump wants to hurt himself also? Since it is his directives, according to his AG.The foremost goal of course is to hurt Trump, the duly elected president of this country
Who is a 'ped'?Yeah "sometimes"* Trump Devotion Syndrome has no bounds.
Covering for peds and offering up copious amounts of Cope in the process.
I'd ask how you sleep at night, but I suspect it is like a baby.
*All the time.
You're right to bring up contradictory messages between Trump and Pam Bondi.Kind of a silly poll answers.
Where's the option to choose, because MAGA voters wanted to see democrats names smeared in public.
Where's the option to choose, because the AG, FBI leaders vowed to release the details of Epstein and many voters of MAGA were pushing for that release.
It is about politics.
![]()
Bondi says Epstein client list 'sitting on my desk right now,' and is reviewing JFK, MLK files
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi told 'America Reports' host John Roberts that she is reviewing the Jeffrey Epstein list, which is "sitting on my desk right now," along with the JFK and MLK files.www.foxnews.com
I guess in february, the AG trump appointed was dead set as you say
Why would his own AG want that?
No I don't believe it will bleed into the mid-terms.I don't know? You tell us, you crafted this huge Cope of a thread.
Is that the only place that Epstein buggered little girls?He “hung out” with Epstein? Did he ever go to his private island?
Ahh, I see, a fill-in-the blanks question.There are two kinds of people:
1. People that can predict results from available data, and
You nor I have the correct answer.You're right to bring up contradictory messages between Trump and Pam Bondi.
And everything is about politics.
That's why you come here in the first place. To see who has the best political message.
If I had the right answer, I would tell you what it is. I don't.
Very perceptive of you to bring up conflicting statements.You nor I have the correct answer.
But based on your poll answers, you aren't interested in the correct answer.
For you only think this is democrats bringing up the Epstein issue. In fact, MAGA was the 1st to bring it up after trump and AG said there's nothing there. After telling the country, "it's on my desk right now, being reviewed". And, "the directive is coming from trump".
Funny how Trump Nation is so wise and worldly until you ask them why they are defending a proven lie and then they get all obtuse and shit.first hit of 3000
![]()
Trump slams supporters who are angered over Epstein case as 'weaklings'
President Donald Trump is lashing out at his own supporters as he tries to clamp down on criticism over his administration's handling of much-hyped records in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation, which Trump now calls a “Hoax.”www.pbs.org
Loaded question = something you refuse to answer that anyone with one finger and google could figure out.When you don't have a reasonable answer, you accuse someone of being obtuse. Good tactic. Everyone is supposed to understand your loaded question.
Your covering for peds is noted.Who is a 'ped'?
Everyone who went to Epstein's island?
No exception? Regardless of substantiating evidence to support your accusations?
Is that how law under anti-Trumpers is supposed to work?
Accuse and convict first without any evidence?
Nah I am not litigious. But I will say I completely disagree with you.No I don't believe it will bleed into the mid-terms.
If it does , then sue me.
This is where you show that you just don't get it. They are pedophiles, not elitists.The notion there would be hard evidence coming out of any investigation into the goings on while cavorting on that island is farfetched.
I highly doubt there would be hard evidence to indict or convict anyone who might have done anything to offend the moral consciences of those who want to see the rich elitists punished.
Oh yeah marching into camps like a democrats president did when the Japanese Americans were rounded up and put in camps for really no good reason or Obama built all those cages to put children in.Everything will always be more expensive. Prices always riding what else is new?
You think with Biden in office gas will be cheaper? Would Biden further deplete our emergency old reserve in order to get a minute reducation in gasoline prices?
Pretty desperate of your to bring up 'marching into Camps' as a reference to Jews and others being sent to concentration camps to be exterminated or turned into slaves for the Nazis. Don't you get tired of tedious Nazi references?
Right and the very liberal Washington Post agree with you.I am asking you. To the best of my knowledge when the flight logs were released it did not show Trump ever flew to the “island”. I am open to any evidence that he did. Do you have any such information that contradicts the flight logs?