• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why is CRT a hot button issue and how did it become one?

There is not a single k thru 12 school that teaches it currently

Teachers union disagrees

2. Supporting and leading campaigns that:
  • Result in increasing the implementation of culturally responsive education, critical race theory, and ethnic (Native people, Asian, Black, Latin(o/a/x), Middle Eastern, North African, and Pacific Islander) Studies curriculum in pre- K-12 and higher education;
 
Teachers union disagrees

2. Supporting and leading campaigns that:
  • Result in increasing the implementation of culturally responsive education, critical race theory, and ethnic (Native people, Asian, Black, Latin(o/a/x), Middle Eastern, North African, and Pacific Islander) Studies curriculum in pre- K-12 and higher education;
That's nice


Currently no such school teaches that in America
 
Where? Name the school.
Meyerholz Elementary School
 
Meyerholz Elementary School
Come on dude. A blog. Even that class is not teaching crt
 
Here's the Pathways framework.



Page 10:
View attachment 67348004


And page 63:

View attachment 67348001

Give it a read. You'll find other amazing passages like the ones asserting that requiring students to provide "correct answers" or "showing their work" are both forms of white oppression.
It does not assert this if you read the entire document. You are cherry picking individual lines out of context that seem to support your conclusion.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/education-oregon/

From the article:
"We reached out to several of the project’s collaborators for their comment on the The Daily Wire and Fox News’ framing of the above-described advice for middle school math teachers, and we heard back from Joanne Rossi Becker, a math and statistics professor at San Jose State University. Becker said while she did not author the report — she served as a reviewer of its materials — the recommendation aimed to encourage educators to allow students to explain their thinking in ways other than writing, such as through conversations, graphs, or videos. “Overall, the document is well done and has cogent recommendations for teachers and other educators to ameliorate implicit bias and racism.

In sum, it’s true a project designed by dozens of school administrators and scholars said expanding options for math students to explain their processes for answering questions could help close racial and language gaps in teaching, addressing existing “white supremacy culture.” But it was false to frame that recommendation as a mandatory directive from ODE to teachers, or to suggest the department itself said the standard idea of “showing work” is a form of white supremacy. "

Any talk of anti-racism must necessarily define racism and identify its impact on American society. Doing so and identifying that it was white Americans whose racism influenced the development and path of the black community is not in itself also racism.
 
Last edited:
It does not assert this if you read the entire document. You are cherry picking individual lines out of context that seem to support your conclusion.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/education-oregon/

Any talk of anti-racism must necessarily define racism and identify its impact on American society. Doing so and identifying that it was white Americans whose racism influenced the development and path of the black community is not in itself also racist.
Racism in math is the issue whether lines were cherry picked or not. That is ludicrous. Math will always hold its users accountable to the truth of 3x3 is 9. You can’t water that down with some weird racially divisive theory no matter how”intelligent “ you think you are.
 
Racism in math is the issue whether lines were cherry picked or not. That is ludicrous. Math will always hold its users accountable to the truth of 3x3 is 9. You can’t water that down with some weird racially divisive theory no matter how”intelligent “ you think you are.
That isn't what is happening. That is how conservative propaganda sources are choosing to interpret it in order to influence the uneducated and easily suggestible to fear progress.
 
It does not assert this if you read the entire document. You are cherry picking individual lines out of context that seem to support your conclusion.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/education-oregon/

From the article:
"We reached out to several of the project’s collaborators for their comment on the The Daily Wire and Fox News’ framing of the above-described advice for middle school math teachers, and we heard back from Joanne Rossi Becker, a math and statistics professor at San Jose State University. Becker said while she did not author the report — she served as a reviewer of its materials — the recommendation aimed to encourage educators to allow students to explain their thinking in ways other than writing, such as through conversations, graphs, or videos. “Overall, the document is well done and has cogent recommendations for teachers and other educators to ameliorate implicit bias and racism.

In sum, it’s true a project designed by dozens of school administrators and scholars said expanding options for math students to explain their processes for answering questions could help close racial and language gaps in teaching, addressing existing “white supremacy culture.” But it was false to frame that recommendation as a mandatory directive from ODE to teachers, or to suggest the department itself said the standard idea of “showing work” is a form of white supremacy. "

Any talk of anti-racism must necessarily define racism and identify its impact on American society. Doing so and identifying that it was white Americans whose racism influenced the development and path of the black community is not in itself also racism.
What is the equating of capitalist views with racist views doing anywhere within a math teaching framework?
 
Strange that the keen-eyed journalist did not quote the teachers or administrators he no doubt inteviewed for his piece.
 
That isn't what is happening. That is how conservative propaganda sources are choosing to interpret it in order to influence the uneducated and easily suggestible to fear progress.
It is what is happening. What do math and race have in common? No matter the color, functionality is the bottom line. Methods of teaching has nothing to do with 3x3=9. It will always be 9. There's nothing to be interpreted. CRT isn't progress. It's confusion.
 
In any discussion thread on CRT you are bound to hear leftwing partisans say something like "CRT is a made up issue. No one is trying to teach it in any form in public schools. This is only coming from right-wing pundits." That, friends, is a lie.​
Want proof? Here you go. Here's the text of a proposal adopted at the NEA's annual meeting in June (emphasis added). As a reminder, the NEA is the county's largest teachers' union. They are arming their troops for the CRT fight:​
New Business Item ACTION:ADOPTED AS MODIFIED​
The NEA will, with guidance on implementation from the NEA president and chairs of the Ethnic Minority Affairs Caucuses:​
A. Share and publicize, through existing channels, information already available on critical race theory (CRT) -- what it is and what it is not; have a team of staffers for members who want to learn more and fight back against anti-CRT rhetoric; and share information with other NEA members as well as their community members.​
B. Provide an already-created, in-depth, study that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness, anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at the intersections of our society, and that we oppose attempts to ban critical race theory and/or The 1619 Project.
C. Publicly (through existing media) convey its support for the accurate and honest teaching of social studies topics, including truthful and age-appropriate accountings of unpleasant aspects of American history, such as slavery, and the oppression and discrimination of Indigenous, Black, Brown, and other peoples of color, as well as the continued impact this history has on our current society. The Association will further convey that in teaching these topics, it is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of the past on current society, including critical race theory.
D. Join with Black Lives Matter at School and the Zinn Education Project to call for a rally this year on October 14—George Floyd’s birthday—as a national day of action to teach lessons about structural racism and oppression. Followed by one day of action that recognize and honor lives taken such as Breonna Taylor, Philando Castile, and others. The National Education Association shall publicize these National Days of Action to all its members, including in NEA Today.​
E. Conduct a virtual listening tour that will educate members on the tools and resources needed to defend honesty in education including but not limited to tools like CRT.​
F. Commit President Becky Pringle to make public statements across all lines of media that support racial honesty in education including but not limited to critical race theory.​

BTW, don't miss that they let their Marxist slip show with the entirely gratuitous targeting of "capitalism" in the above.

Here's a thought; maybe these public employees should be putting their energies into improving math and reading levels -- which continue to lag in the US relative to most of the rest of the industrialized world -- thereby giving their students the tools required to make up their own minds when it comes to social policy and social science theory.
 
It is what is happening. What do math and race have in common? No matter the color, functionality is the bottom line. Methods of teaching has nothing to do with 3x3=9. It will always be 9. There's nothing to be interpreted. CRT isn't progress. It's confusion.
If race and education have nothing in common in America, then why do black students do worse on average in education than white students? And why shouldn't efforts be made to help black students do better?
 
If race and education have nothing in common in America, then why do black students do worse on average in education than white students? And why shouldn't efforts be made to help black students do better?
It's obvious to me that black students are getting extra attention. Black people are getting extra attention, and have been. How's it working out for them? Any comment I might give concerning why black students don't perform as well as white students would be perceived as racist. And that's part of the overall problem. White people have become targets. They are no longer supposed to speak unless they are accusing other white people of racism.

Work hard and you will prosper regardless of race. Things are better in the US because most black people know that. It's really on them, isn't it.
 
From Britannica.com "Critical race theorists hold that the law and legal institutions are inherently racist insofar as they function to create maintain social economic and political inequalities between whites and non whites, especially African-Americans." (Emphasis mine.)

With respect to the definition above, it seems that the left in its rhetoric chooses to overemphasize the words coming before "insofar," while the right in its rhetoric chooses to forget "insofar" and everything after that word.

Just another day in the US with both sides talking past one another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwf
It's obvious to me that black students are getting extra attention. Black people are getting extra attention, and have been. How's it working out for them? Any comment I might give concerning why black students don't perform as well as white students would be perceived as racist. And that's part of the overall problem. White people have become targets. They are no longer supposed to speak unless they are accusing other white people of racism.

Work hard and you will prosper regardless of race. Things are better in the US because most black people know that. It's really on them, isn't it.
Why would your comment be perceived as racist unless it actually is racist? The racist explanation as to why black people see less success on average than white people in modern America has been long disproven. There is nothing inherently inferior in homo sapiens whose ancestors spent more recent time in Africa than in homo sapiens whose ancestors spent more recent time in Europe. They are exactly the same species with exactly the same evolutionary history, all of whom evolved to their current level of intelligence in southern Africa. Not unlike dogs and wolves: No amount of selective breeding for intelligence has created a super-intelligent dog who is naturally smarter than wolves because intelligence is simply not malleable over the course of a few hundred thousand years even with artificial selection for intelligence. We can drastically change their morphology and the color and density of their fur, but we can't make them smarter than wolves.

So if there is no evolutionary explanation as to why black students do worse on average than white students, then what is the explanation? The answer is culture. That's the difference here. White Americans are almost universally raised in a culture that has enjoyed dominance for centuries. Black Americans are almost universally raised in a culture that suffered under immense oppression for the vast majority of its existence. You can't undo this with one generation of "hard work." It is from our culture that we get our values, and any conservative can tell you just how hard it is to abandon values you were raised with, and just how difficult a time those that do abandon their cultural values have surviving in said culture.

Black students are getting extra attention because they need it. They need it because on average they are doing worse in educational settings than white students.
 
Last edited:
From Britannica.com "Critical race theorists hold that the law and legal institutions are inherently racist insofar as they function to create maintain social economic and political inequalities between whites and non whites, especially African-Americans." (Emphasis mine.)

With respect to the definition above, it seems that the left in its rhetoric chooses to overemphasize the words coming before "insofar," while the right in its rhetoric chooses to forget "insofar" and everything after that word.

Just another day in the US with both sides talking past one another.
Why take the time trying to understand something when a cursory glance at the first part of the definition serves to reinforce your preconceptions about the other side?
 
If race and education have nothing in common in America, then why do black students do worse on average in education than white students? And why shouldn't efforts be made to help black students do better?

Is it actually about race? Or is it about poverty, and home life, and other factors?

The problem is there are MANY factors that contribute to students success, when you try and focus just on ONE ie. Race, then you really aren't trying to help better the situation.....
 
Back
Top Bottom