I assume that others like me are tired of racial obsession. Some of us don't need or want to place any emphasis on a person's race as any special qualifier for different treatment, because we see each other as people. Some people we like, because we like how they think and behave, some people we grow tired of because of their antics. Long live MLK! We're all basically the same, why is this so hard to understand?
There is of course the alternative, where we focus primarily on insignificant differences and place enormous importance on that, and start dividing each other on that basis, to demonize the other without regard for who they are beyond their skin colour. I wonder if we can find any examples of the outcomes of this type of thinking in history?
I'd consider carefully what far left activist are trying to achieve and the manner in which they are trying to achieve it. It's for these reasons I reject the BLM movement as a destructive, divisive movement.
Because people are people, we have way, way, way more in common than we different. What is the use in hyper-focusing on differences? Division leads to resentment of the 'other', it's not something I think is useful.
I was recently replying to someone else in another thread that became polluted in racial arguments where none had been brought up initially. While replying, I re-read what I had wrote and found it to be concise enough that I think it summarizes my problems with wokeness in general and BML in particular, (below is paraphrased).
I assume that others like me are tired of racial obsession. Some of us don't need or want to place any emphasis on a person's race as any special qualifier for different treatment, because we see each other as people. Some people we like, because we like how they think and behave, some people we grow tired of because of their antics. Long live MLK! We're all basically the same, why is this so hard to understand?
There is of course the alternative, where we focus primarily on insignificant differences and place enormous importance on that, and start dividing each other on that basis, to demonize the other without regard for who they are beyond their skin colour. I wonder if we can find any examples of the outcomes of this type of thinking in history?
I'd consider carefully what far left activist are trying to achieve and the manner in which they are trying to achieve it. It's for these reasons I reject the BLM movement as a destructive, divisive movement.
I have been told that I am hypocritical for supporting protests during a pandemic even though I have said that people who violate health orders should be fined or subpoenaed the following day and then forced to quarantine for several weeks between testing.
So much for diversity. Diversity is everything except whites. We knew all along that the cult of diversity is anti white. You just admitted it. We see how black run and black dominated cities are in decline and ruin.
Because people are people isn't an answer. At least not a coherent one so ill ask again. What common ground can be had between people who believe black lives matter and people who do not? :shrug:
What you should have told those lying ****heads is that demonstrators wore masks in much higher numbers in the open than Dirtbag's rally attendees did inside in Tulsa (although there was some social distancing much to the embarrassment of Dirtbag). There's also a line of thinking the big protest marches kept a lot of people home and actually might have helped slow the spread in those cities with big BLM marches:
Black Lives Matter protests may have slowed overall spread of coronavirus in Denver and other cities, new study finds – The Colorado Sun
I am NOT suggesting that this was scientifically established but the point is that there's zero, none, no evidence whatsoever that BLM protests plays any part in Covid-19 spread.
Happy to reply, and I will look forward to further discourse with you.
But first...you really should stop whining about "character attacks". That's what weak-minded right-wingers do. Truth is, you're no liberal. Based upon your previous posts, you define yourself as a CLASSICAL liberal, which is the ideological foundation upon which BOTH liberalism and conservatism in America are based. So, at best...at best...you're being coy by insisting that you are "a liberal'. Everyone can see (and your posting history confirms) that you are a conservative. That's all fine and good, but don't play that game, and then whine when people point it out to you. That's just weak sauce, my friend.
Now, to your OP.
So, you're "tired of racial obsession", huh? Please, define that further, for me? I ask that, because most liberals are tired a ACTUAL RACISM, and have no use for ambiguous terms like "racial obsession". That's an empty term. Are you tired of Racism, firefly, or are you just tired of black people protesting against racism? Please, be as candid and specific as possible in your reply.
Next....what's so "divisive" about protesting against Racism? Who's being "divided"? Think about that.
Next, let's be clear and honest with one another, ok? When you say you only see people as people...you are (once again...as in the "racial obsession" remarks) dodging the issue. And the issue is this: Everyone sees race. EVERYONE see race. If you are an American, and you claim that you don't notice race...you're a liar. Noticing race does NOT mean one is a racist. But pretending to not see race is very often a sign of someone who has issues with race. So if you are sincere, I suggest you stop using that argument around others; because people who understand race and racism can see right through it.
Next....#BLM. Do you honestly believe that the protests are about "insignificant differences" and that they "demonize" all white people? Have you not been paying attention? If so, what news sources are you relying upon for this conclusion? I assume you are a white person...and I assume you are not American (as "colour", as opposed to "color" is decidedly British). If my assumptions are incorrect, please let me know. I am an African-American man, and I suspect that you and I may come to these discussions with very different sets of lived, learned experiences.
So, more context is helpful in these types of discussions.
Lastly, what EXACTLY do you believe "the far left activists" are trying to achieve (and how)? Again, your remarks seem intentionally vague and shallow. Please, elaborate so that we can debate them on their merits (or lack thereof).
Much of your post is true, but there were still a lot of protesters who violated state health orders with their actions, and there should not be exceptions to those orders if we want to properly mitigate transmission. It is not wise to gather in large groups during a pandemic for any reason, especially while ignoring mandates that protect the general public. While many wore masks, there were enough who did not, and social distancing was hit or miss depending on portions of the overall group.
I was recently replying to someone else in another thread that became polluted in racial arguments where none had been brought up initially. While replying, I re-read what I had wrote and found it to be concise enough that I think it summarizes my problems with wokeness in general and BML in particular, (below is paraphrased).
I assume that others like me are tired of racial obsession. Some of us don't need or want to place any emphasis on a person's race as any special qualifier for different treatment, because we see each other as people. Some people we like, because we like how they think and behave, some people we grow tired of because of their antics. Long live MLK! We're all basically the same, why is this so hard to understand?
There is of course the alternative, where we focus primarily on insignificant differences and place enormous importance on that, and start dividing each other on that basis, to demonize the other without regard for who they are beyond their skin colour. I wonder if we can find any examples of the outcomes of this type of thinking in history?
I'd consider carefully what far left activist are trying to achieve and the manner in which they are trying to achieve it. It's for these reasons I reject the BLM movement as a destructive, divisive movement.
Your goal of wanting people to just be people, and race not to be a big issue, isn't wrong. But you appear to be horribly ignorant and oblivious to the situation of many people, especially black people, and what's needed to get from here to there. It's like your wife was raped, and you say, 'darling, I am against you being raped, but I'm also against having to be annoyed hearing about it. So, I'm against you telling me you were raped.'
There are plenty of legitimate 'concerns' to have about a movement like BLM. It is a popular movement borne of opposing injustice; as a popular movement, there's no guarantee it will always do the right thing. It's not only fine to criticize it if it doesn't, it's right to. But your 'I'm against BLM because they talk too much about race' is quite misguided. Opposing justice because it annoys you isn't much better than opposing it because you support injustice.
What you're saying can be fine on a more personal level. For example, corporations tend to 'treat people as people' and mostly ignore race. If there is a black person in a meeting, the meeting doesn't say "this is Barack. As a black person, he cares a lot about racial justice for black people. But treat him like a person." And so on. They just do. You don't have to talk about race all the time with black friends.
But we are a society, with a history, with issues, and some of those are systemic, and as a society, we need to care about that if we don't want every group less than half the country subject to abuses, because the majority say 'hey, it doesn't affect me, I don't care'. Institutions - police, courts, libraries, schools, politicians, even private businesses - are legitimately obligated to not behave too badly, and be constrained by society as needed.
The alternative, as you say - go look at the old pictures of Bull Connor using dogs and firehoses on black children, and say, 'not my problem, don't care, the government should not care.' That's the society you make with that approach. If not that exact one - times have changed - one with more George Floyds or other problems. You should celebrate BLM as our democracy actually functioning for once, and it's ok to condemn the 1% who use the protests for crime sprees.
This falls into the "do as I say, not as I do" category. The rightwing or even fence-sitters have no ground to stand on about adhering to guidelines for preventing covid spread. The first group defiantly rejects those measures, thus the current rampant spread and death in states like FL, AL, TX , GA, MS...etc--i.e., most governed by dedicated trumper governors and the second group passively submits to that rejection. These are the places who led the charge to open early and have now set the entire country back to nearly the beginning as those states make it easier for further and bigger virus spread than before.
What the **** are you talking about? :blink:
More than half the BLM protesters are white. The only people lacking in diversity are white wingers, hence the monkier.
I consider it an attack on my character to claim I did things that I did not with insults thrown in to boot. As an example:
I was recently replying to someone else in another thread that became polluted in racial arguments where none had been brought up initially. While replying, I re-read what I had wrote and found it to be concise enough that I think it summarizes my problems with wokeness in general and BML in particular, (below is paraphrased).
I assume that others like me are tired of racial obsession. Some of us don't need or want to place any emphasis on a person's race as any special qualifier for different treatment, because we see each other as people. Some people we like, because we like how they think and behave, some people we grow tired of because of their antics. Long live MLK! We're all basically the same, why is this so hard to understand?
There is of course the alternative, where we focus primarily on insignificant differences and place enormous importance on that, and start dividing each other on that basis, to demonize the other without regard for who they are beyond their skin colour. I wonder if we can find any examples of the outcomes of this type of thinking in history?
I'd consider carefully what far left activist are trying to achieve and the manner in which they are trying to achieve it. It's for these reasons I reject the BLM movement as a destructive, divisive movement.
Happy to reply, and I will look forward to further discourse with you.
But first...you really should stop whining about "character attacks". That's what weak-minded right-wingers do. Truth is, you're no liberal. Based upon your previous posts, you define yourself as a CLASSICAL liberal, which is the ideological foundation upon which BOTH liberalism and conservatism in America are based. So, at best...at best...you're being coy by insisting that you are "a liberal'. Everyone can see (and your posting history confirms) that you are a conservative. That's all fine and good, but don't play that game, and then whine when people point it out to you. That's just weak sauce, my friend.
Now, to your OP.
So, you're "tired of racial obsession", huh? Please, define that further, for me? I ask that, because most liberals are tired a ACTUAL RACISM, and have no use for ambiguous terms like "racial obsession". That's an empty term. Are you tired of Racism, firefly, or are you just tired of black people protesting against racism? Please, be as candid and specific as possible in your reply.
Next....what's so "divisive" about protesting against Racism? Who's being "divided"? Think about that.
Next, let's be clear and honest with one another, ok? When you say you only see people as people...you are (once again...as in the "racial obsession" remarks) dodging the issue. And the issue is this: Everyone sees race. EVERYONE see race. If you are an American, and you claim that you don't notice race...you're a liar. Noticing race does NOT mean one is a racist. But pretending to not see race is very often a sign of someone who has issues with race. So if you are sincere, I suggest you stop using that argument around others; because people who understand race and racism can see right through it.
Next....#BLM. Do you honestly believe that the protests are about "insignificant differences" and that they "demonize" all white people? Have you not been paying attention? If so, what news sources are you relying upon for this conclusion? I assume you are a white person...and I assume you are not American (as "colour", as opposed to "color" is decidedly British). If my assumptions are incorrect, please let me know. I am an African-American man, and I suspect that you and I may come to these discussions with very different sets of lived, learned experiences.
So, more context is helpful in these types of discussions.
Lastly, what EXACTLY do you believe "the far left activists" are trying to achieve (and how)? Again, your remarks seem intentionally vague and shallow. Please, elaborate so that we can debate them on their merits (or lack thereof).
Maybe what we need is to do excise the gangrene that is white wing culture from the rest of America. your words.
I could care less about anyone else's "movement" or their interpretation of anything. Black lives matter to me - period.
Which I stand by. Not all Americans subscribe to the deplorable culture of white wingism.
"Maybe what we need is to do excise the gangrene that is white wing culture from the rest of America"
Which I stand by. Not all white Americans subscribe to the deplorable culture of white wingism.
Not everyone subscribes to yours, does it need to be excised?
Again, you can't seem to find an answer to my previous question. Where is the common ground to be had between those who believe black lives matter and those who do not?This speaks to my point very well. I don't espouse many right wing views, but I'd never post any like "excise the gangrene that is white wing culture from the rest of America". This is very divisive, and serves to confirm my fears about where we are heading.
Again, you can't seem to find an answer to my previous question. Where is the common ground to be had between those who believe black lives matter and those who do not?
I'd invite you to read my post history, I'm liberal on most positions. Also, trying to discredit my character doesn't invalidate my argument. I'd be interested in actual rebuttals to my point.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?