Is it really that hard to find ACADEMIC conservative or libertarian research and not have to resort to propaganda videos on youtube?
Problem is, you added "academic" to "conservative or libertarian". Higher learning does support some conservatism (but not much), but doesn't support libertarianism much at all.
Problem is, you added "academic" to "conservative or libertarian". Higher learning does support some conservatism (but not much), but doesn't support libertarianism much at all.
Higher learning and libertarianism are a contradiction in terms.
The propaganda film is a fraud like all libertarian rhetoric: it counts the burdens of government but not the benefits. Adolescent.
...and you count the benefits and deny there are problems at all.
Nope, but don't let me disturb you rightwing meme. All regulations have costs. The issue is the benefit. In our country, all proposed regulations are run through a cost/benefit analysis before they are even made public. And then they go through a public hearing process. And then they are subject to judicial review.
But all this is lost in your alternate universe of Big Gummit Badguys
You are one gullible liberal. Never question the benevolence of the Nanny State.
Higher learning and libertarianism are a contradiction in terms.
The propaganda film is a fraud like all libertarian rhetoric: it counts the burdens of government but not the benefits. Adolescent.
All that information you learn is NOTHING, if it is not used to free humanity from the bonds of stupidity and tyranny.
A nonsequitur. No surprise.
Yeah, the tyranny of corporations and the rich and their hatred of knowledge. I'm with you brother. Wait . . .
No surprise in your answer either. As brainwashed as it gets.
Funny how you hate corporations and the rich, yet these are the very same people that run the government whose benevolence you trust without question.
It's not funny at all. Tyranny is the exercise of power and they have it. You want them to have more power by removing governmental restraints on them. Pretty stupid.
There are the government. The only way they have more power is by increasing the power of government. What is stupid is your belief that the government restrains them. The tail does not wag the dog.
So democratic=big government now? Let's not conflate terms.Your hatred of our democratic way of life is well documented, and is a typical idee fixe of the right. But thanks for sharing.
Your hatred of our democratic way of life is well documented, and is a typical idee fixe of the right. But thanks for sharing.
How is corporate control of the people's government a democracy?
Let's try a little experiment:
Name one Congressman, Obama Administration cabinet member or SC Justice that is NOT a 1%er.
Alcee Hastings, (D-FL)
If you have a household net worth of $6,816,200, you are in the top 1%
In a 2011 survey of U.S. lawmakers, the Center for Responsible Politics named Hastings the "Poorest Member of Congress," with a 2010 average net worth of -$4,732,002.
Technically we have a winner, but lets be honest, you don't get that far in debt without playing the game.
Winning Technically is good enough for me.
There are no prizes for 2nd place, eh?
BTW - I will agree that the money that he owes was spent on something.
So democratic=big government now? Let's not conflate terms.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?