• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Fire A Single Shot In WWIII? (2 Viewers)

rhinefire

DP Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
12,303
Reaction score
4,241
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
Why contemplate bombs etc. in a WWIII when satellites and computers control everything we do? Shut down power means no jobs, no cash, no food, no transportation, no water resulting in mass chaos and violence everywhere. Agree?
 
Why contemplate bombs etc. in a WWIII when satellites and computers control everything we do? Shut down power means no jobs, no cash, no food, no transportation, no water resulting in mass chaos and violence everywhere. Agree?

No. If no shots are fired, the rich dudes who make bullets and bombs will suffer financially.

Billionaires must be protected at all costs.
 
Why contemplate bombs etc. in a WWIII when satellites and computers control everything we do? Shut down power means no jobs, no cash, no food, no transportation, no water resulting in mass chaos and violence everywhere. Agree?

And well placed bombs on electricity step-up transformer stations, can achieve just that.
 
No. If no shots are fired, the rich dudes who make bullets and bombs will suffer financially.

Billionaires must be protected at all costs.

it's not about protecting Billionaires IMHO,...regardless they will all be down in their well protected bunkers, and you will not.

study the concept of 'shock and awe' for starts.

they fully intend to reduce the surface population significantly and efficiently. that is what the nuuuks and other weapons of mass destruction are for.

it seems that the Oligarchy has sped up the WW three time line because the B-61 weapons were hustled out 7 months early; me thinks they did that for a clear reason, basically obvious for me.


well as i noted last week we are 7 months ahead of schedule in producing the B61 latest model of nuclear weapons. The U.S. has fast-tracked production of its latest nuclear gravity bomb with the first unit completed seven months ahead of schedule. The B61-13 replaces some older B61-7 models and offers improved flexibility for targeting. https://www.msn.com/en-us/public-sa...ear-bomb-built-seven-months-early/vi-AA1CC4sg


.
 
it's not about protecting Billionaires IMHO,...regardless they will all be down in their well protected bunkers, and you will not.

study the concept of 'shock and awe' for starts.

they fully intend to reduce the surface population significantly and efficiently. that is what the nuuuks and other weapons of mass destruction are for.

it seems that the Oligarchy has sped up the WW three time line because the B-61 weapons were hustled out 7 months early; me thinks they did that for a clear reason, basically obvious for me.


well as i noted last week we are 7 months ahead of schedule in producing the B61 latest model of nuclear weapons. The U.S. has fast-tracked production of its latest nuclear gravity bomb with the first unit completed seven months ahead of schedule. The B61-13 replaces some older B61-7 models and offers improved flexibility for targeting. https://www.msn.com/en-us/public-sa...ear-bomb-built-seven-months-early/vi-AA1CC4sg


.
You do know there is an entire section for this kind of stupidity right? And this isn’t it.
 
You do know there is an entire section for this kind of stupidity right? And this isn’t it.

This isn't a conspiracy and is why nuclear plants are never connected to the internet.
If a nation can take out the elctricity for an enemy it won't need to bother fighting. If the UK could cut power to a few major US cities for a few weeks it would be chaos as you'll be busy sending in people to help the millions who need to be evacuated.

Just think how many in urgent care hospitals would die in the first hour or so.
 
This isn't a conspiracy and is why nuclear plants are never connected to the internet.
If a nation can take out the elctricity for an enemy it won't need to bother fighting. If the UK could cut power to a few major US cities for a few weeks it would be chaos as you'll be busy sending in people to help the millions who need to be evacuated.

Just think how many in urgent care hospitals would die in the first hour or so.
The conspiracy is his nonsense about billionaires intening to reduce the surface population significantly and efficiently. Or that the Oligarchy has sped up the WW three time line.

That you don’t see that is odd.
 
The conspiracy is his nonsense about billionaires intening to reduce the surface population significantly and efficiently. Or that the Oligarchy has sped up the WW three time line.

That you don’t see that is odd.

I don't agree with both of those ideas.
I don't see how killing vast numbers of people helps the rich and how a world war would benefit anyone.
 
Why contemplate bombs etc. in a WWIII when satellites and computers control everything we do? Shut down power means no jobs, no cash, no food, no transportation, no water resulting in mass chaos and violence everywhere. Agree?

We're working on that.
 
Sure, but you’d need a nuclear warhead to generate it and that counts as a shot. 😁


That is just one way

A stuxnet type virus is a countries electric grid computers could do it. All it requires is a few idiots plugging their infected phones to networked computers
 
That is just one way

A stuxnet type virus is a countries electric grid computers could do it. All it requires is a few idiots plugging their infected phones to networked computers
Any sufficiently advanced country can overcome that relatively quickly. We saw that with Stuxnet. To have the effect you want you’ll need to cause physical damage on a massive scale. That’s what an EMP does.
 
Any sufficiently advanced country can overcome that relatively quickly. We saw that with Stuxnet. To have the effect you want you’ll need to cause physical damage on a massive scale. That’s what an EMP does.
Stuxnet can cause systems to damage themselves ie override safety protocols. Enough systems damage and a countries grid shuts down
 
Try firing a missile without power
 
what a question

A very valid one when someone asks how many missiles can be fired without power.

Missiles have their own power systems independent of the civilian power grid. No amount of attacks on electrical systems (kinetic or cyber) will stop the firing of missiles.
 
A very valid one when someone asks how many missiles can be fired without power.

Missiles have their own power systems independent of the civilian power grid. No amount of attacks on electrical systems (kinetic or cyber) will stop the firing of missiles.
and those missiles are guided by what?
 
and those missiles are guided by what?
You don’t seem to know too much about this topic for someone with a rather obvious attitude.

US ballistic missiles use both inertia and celestial navigation in the event of GPS jamming or satellites being destroyed.

And how exactly do you think the power to nuclear powered submarines is going to be destroyed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom