Why Everyone's Bored With Atheists

[Frank Apisa]

You are confusing your belief with knowledge

No I am not.

But if your happiness and contentment depend on that being the case...continue to suppose it is. I wish you all the happiness and contentment possible.

 

[Frank Apisa]

Thanks for finally agreeing that there are no gods, whether you realized you were agreeing or not.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Thank you.

And now your game goes to run and deflect instead of supporting your assertion.

I have supported my assertions.

You refuse to accept it.

Okay, that happens often in conversations with atheist types.

 

[Frank Apisa]

A false statement that you refuse to even support with anything other than repeating the false statement

Hey you said the same thing and I was just agreeing with you.

 

[Frank Apisa]

So, God has now been established as impossible on an internet message board?

Big if true.

Several of these people disagree with these two things:

1) It is possible there are no gods.

2) It is possible that there is at least one god.

Don't know why. But since they do disagree with them, they obviously are of the opinion that one of them has been established as impossible.

 

[Frank Apisa]

We don't know whether God has been established as impossible or not.

Unless you have some kind of evidence that God has not been established as impossible, what reason is there to assume that God has not been established as impossible?

Ahhh, there it is.

I knew that element of your game would enter the arena at some point.

 

[Mulefoot]

We don't know whether God has been established as impossible or not.

Unless you have some kind of evidence that God has not been established as impossible, what reason is there to assume that God has not been established as impossible?

If you don't think reasons exist, there's not much you can do about that.

For those who do believe, I assume they value various reasons that have been hashed on this site for years, as evidential.

 

[AConcernedCitizen]

If you don't think reasons exist, there's not much you can do about that.

For those who do believe, I assume they value various reasons that have been hashed on this site for years, as evidential.

Sure. The faithful have faith in their various gods. That doesn't prove that gods haven't been established as impossible.

 

[soylentgreen]

We don't know whether God has been established as impossible or not.

Unless you have some kind of evidence that God has not been established as impossible, what reason is there to assume that God has not been established as impossible?

That is not how logic or good reasoning works. Do you have any evidence that harry potter does not exist? Or any fictional character. It is up to the person making a claim to establish that claim. Not for others to prove it is impossible.
And the very fact that the theists cannot come up with even one good reason for a god to exist is in itself a good enough reason to consider that a god does not exist.

 

[soylentgreen]

Sure. The faithful have faith in their various gods. That doesn't prove that gods haven't been established as impossible.

Faith is what happens when there is a lack of evidence and good reasons.

 

[watsup]

What's a blind guess?

Ask Frank. He’s the one who started it.

 

[Mulefoot]

Sure. The faithful have faith in their various gods. That doesn't prove that gods haven't been established as impossible.

Well no. But have they?

 

[watsup]

So, God has now been established as impossible on an internet message board?

Big if true.

God has been established as a figment of human imagination.

 

[Mulefoot]

God has been established as a figment of human imagination.

Please expound.

 

[Gordy327]

So, God has now been established as impossible on an internet message board?

Big if true.

Impossible from a logic standpoint.

 

[Quag]

It is not a belief...it is a fact. It is possible there are no gods.

Don't you agree?

The FACT that it is a possible that no gods exist is not a belief. It is a fact.

If you disagree that it is possible there are no gods...and you seem to be saying that you do...

...then you are saying it is impossible that there are no gods.

That does reverse the burden.


You, and all the rest, use repetition just as much as I...and for the same reason.

Try to enjoy the interaction as much as I am. It will make things go easiesr.


It is possible does not need more support than...If it has not been established as impossible...IT IS POSSIBLE.

But if you are saying it is not possible...that requires much more.


The existence of gods IS unknown. The possibility of gods is known. Either it can be established that one IS (meaning at that point the possibility of the other cannot be)...then both ARE POSSIBLE.

Have no idea of why you folk cannot see that, but I suspect it is because none of you want for me to be correct.

Sorry, Guys...I AM CORRECT. It is possible there are no gods.

My position is given above.

I'm here to respond to whatever you want to dispute about it.

Still pretending your belief is knowledge and still no attempt to support your statement

 

[Quag]

Hey you said the same thing and I was just agreeing with you.

Another attempt to reverse the burden of proof which would be bad on its own but as I have already repeatedly disproven the statement it fails on every level

 

[Quag]

That is not how logic or good reasoning works. Do you have any evidence that harry potter does not exist? Or any fictional character. It is up to the person making a claim to establish that claim. Not for others to prove it is impossible.
And the very fact that the theists cannot come up with even one good reason for a god to exist is in itself a good enough reason to consider that a god does not exist.

Frank is the one making the claim ACC is merely pointing out the absurdity of that claim

 

[Frank Apisa]

Another attempt to reverse the burden of proof which would be bad on its own but as I have already repeatedly disproven the statement it fails on every level

You have a very, very, very low threshold for "prove" and "disprove." You have not disproven any statement of mine pon any level.

But it is cute how often you claim to have done so.

 

[Quag]

No I am not.

But if your happiness and contentment depend on that being the case...continue to suppose it is. I wish you all the happiness and contentment possible.

Yes you are.
You are free to do so but I will point it out when you do

 

[Frank Apisa]

Frank is the one making the claim ACC is merely pointing out the absurdity of that claim

There is nothing absurd about any claim I have made in this thread.

 

[Frank Apisa]

Yes you are.
You are free to do so but I will point it out when you do

I am not mistaking belief with knowledge at all.

But it seems you are going to insist that I am....so enjoy your delusion.

 

[Quag]

You have a very, very, very low threshold for "prove" and "disprove." You have not disproven any statement of mine pon any level.

Yes I have repeatedly, so have others

But it is cute how often you claim to have done so.

You have never ever ever tried to defend your statement you have dishonestly claimed you have.

 

[Quag]

There is nothing absurd about any claim I have made in this thread.

Oh look another absurdly false claim from Frank must be a day that ends in Y

 

[Frank Apisa]

Yes I have repeatedly, so have others

You have not...and neither has anyone else.

You have never ever ever tried to defend your statement you have dishonestly claimed you have.

Baloney.

 

[Quag]

I am not mistaking belief with knowledge at all.

But it seems you are going to insist that I am....so enjoy your delusion.

Then prove it

Yeah I thought not