• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why did the US decide to go to war with Iraq?

honesty

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Can someone provide me a non-bias link to a document or inform me in a non biased honest way the answer? I never paid attention to the reason why we went to war and now, embarassingly, I'd like to know why. I'm not here to debate, just to get honest answers.
 
Whose motive are you looking for? Bush's? Mine?
 
Can someone provide me a non-bias link to a document or inform me in a non biased honest way the answer? I never paid attention to the reason why we went to war and now, embarassingly, I'd like to know why. I'm not here to debate, just to get honest answers.
seriously? there are no non biased links.
 
it was we belived that their leader was involved with 9/11 it may also have been that bush wanted to finish were his father left off I dont know if that was bias or not
 
Afghanistan was not enough payback to the Muslim world, so we went back and knocked over the last Muslim Leader to shake his fist at us, who had already given us ample casus belli with his ceasefire violations, while geographically dividing Iran from its proxies in Gaza and Lebanon.

These moves weaken Islam and its contiguity, and thus were excellent moves when one admits the real enemy, you know, who attacked us and why, Muslims, for Jihad.
 
These moves weaken Islam and its contiguity, and thus were excellent moves when one admits the real enemy, you know, who attacked us and why, Muslims, for Jihad.

Nothing weakens Islam as long as we Muslims walk on this earth and keep faith. Only Muslims can damage Islam, never can a outsider do it.
 
Nothing weakens Islam as long as we Muslims walk on this earth and keep faith. Only Muslims can damage Islam, never can a outsider do it.

Silly. We could nuke your black rock 40 minutes from now.

Everyone finishing the fifth pillar goes home with a lethal dose of radiation.

Q.E.D. Islam can be damaged from the outside, and if it doesn't reform, it will be.
 
Nothing weakens Islam as long as we Muslims walk on this earth and keep faith. Only Muslims can damage Islam, never can a outsider do it.

Imagine people carpeted Morocco to Indonesia with nukes, and rounded up and shot muslims in all other countries. I think that'd damage Islam.
 
Whose motive are you looking for? Bush's? Mine?
is there an official government document that highlights the reasons?
 
it was we belived that their leader was involved with 9/11 it may also have been that bush wanted to finish were his father left off I dont know if that was bias or not
we did not believe that, imo. i didn't anyway, because he was NOT involved. as for bush's daddy motive, i have no clue.
 
Imagine people carpeted Morocco to Indonesia with nukes, and rounded up and shot muslims in all other countries. I think that'd damage Islam.

Doesn't matter.
As long as one Muslim lives, Islam will survive and continue on.
Nothing can damage Allah's words.
 
Silly. We could nuke your black rock 40 minutes from now.

Everyone finishing the fifth pillar goes home with a lethal dose of radiation.

Q.E.D. Islam can be damaged from the outside, and if it doesn't reform, it will be.

My Mecca is important to me yes but it will not damage beyond repair Islam. Nothing will hurt the Qu'ran but other Muslims.
 
Afghanistan was not enough payback to the Muslim world, so we went back and knocked over the last Muslim Leader to shake his fist at us, who had already given us ample casus belli with his ceasefire violations, while geographically dividing Iran from its proxies in Gaza and Lebanon.

These moves weaken Islam and its contiguity, and thus were excellent moves when one admits the real enemy, you know, who attacked us and why, Muslims, for Jihad.
i have no problems with self interest and self protection. the fact is, iraq was no threat to us.

and i also have no interest in weakening islam, only marginalizing radical muslims who wage unprovoked war.
 
And if you kill that last Muslim?

The Qu'ran will live on and someone will convert eventually.
But the chances of finding and killing 1 billion Muslims is small to say the least
 
i have no problems with self interest and self protection. the fact is, iraq was no threat to us.

Iraq is between Iran and the proxies they use to make war on our ally Israel.

A unified caliphate IS a threat to us, and controlling the area between the Iranians and Mecca prevents a unified caliphate.

and i also have no interest in weakening islam, only marginalizing radical muslims who wage unprovoked war.

Don't buy the "radical" part, there is only Dar al Harb and Dar al Islam.
 
The Qu'ran will live on and someone will convert eventually.
But the chances of finding and killing 1 billion Muslims is small to say the least

I'm not saying it will ever happen, or that it should. But it's possible. Nuclear winter, anyone?
 
Iraq is between Iran and the proxies they use to make war on our ally Israel.

A unified caliphate IS a threat to us, and controlling the area between the Iranians and Mecca prevents a unified caliphate.
A unified caliphate is never going to happen. Too many political differences.


Don't buy the "radical" part, there is only Dar al Harb and Dar al Islam.

Because everyone in Islam always gets along, right.
 
A unified caliphate IS a threat to us, and controlling the area between the Iranians and Mecca prevents a unified caliphate.

:lamo

United? Muslims united?
 
I'm not saying it will ever happen, or that it should. But it's possible. Nuclear winter, anyone?

Never will it happen.
Muslims exist in every corner of the Earth. A nuclear that can take out the world is the only way.
 
I'm a complete newbie, and I just wanted to understand the war. I really didn't want this to turn into 'radical muslim' this and 'daddy's war' that. There must be some official documents highlighting the reasons for war. Maybe those are the reasons, but I'd just like to know what the 'official' reason is.
 
A unified caliphate is never going to happen. Too many political differences.

Poitical differences get subsumed when there is an external enemy.

The fact that two quarterbacks don't like each other, and vie for the same starting position, does not mean they are not on the same team.

Preventing unification is not all it accomplishes. It also prevents and hinders collusion by the "loose confederation acting in concert" that is Islam.
 
I'm a complete newbie, and I just wanted to understand the war. I really didn't want this to turn into 'radical muslim' this and 'daddy's war' that. There must be some official documents highlighting the reasons for war. Maybe those are the reasons, but I'd just like to know what the 'official' reason is.

Welcome to the forums.

Almost every thread on Iraq end up somehow on this line.
 
I'm a complete newbie, and I just wanted to understand the war. I really didn't want this to turn into 'radical muslim' this and 'daddy's war' that. There must be some official documents highlighting the reasons for war. Maybe those are the reasons, but I'd just like to know what the 'official' reason is.

If you want official documented reasons, look up Saddam's litany of ceasefire violations. Undeniable Casus Belli.
 
If you want official documented reasons, look up Saddam's litany of ceasefire violations. Undeniable Casus Belli.

thank you, is this outlined in a us government document anywhere regarding the reasons for war?
 
Back
Top Bottom