- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Typical of an ambulance chaser mentality to hide behind the details of the law and their own anonimity.
Wow, Winston is back, where have you been?
ambulance chasers are the people who give dems more money than any group save perhaps the teachers' union. I protect people from ambulance chasers
In your parlance, you suckle off their teat. Thanks for teaching me that all purpose retort.
A wise choice -- always best to be gracious.Decided it was Easter and that I would do my charity work for the day and take you off ignore.
No, I never said they are to be ignored, I said that Conservatives and Republicans are hypocrites for whining about Obama when their own selections for president can't even carry Obama's jock strap.Guess liberal results are to be ignored so you can continue to bash Bush and Reagan?
Sadly for you, you won't be around to see it.One of these days you are going to grow up and realize what a fool liberalism has made out of you, hope I am around to see it.
Too funny!!!Now you're projecting, Conservative, that is what you do. Who do you credit for the good economy from 1983 through 1988 -- Reagan or the Democrat-led House? Who do you credit for the good economy from 1992 through 2000 -- Clinton or the Republican-led House? Who do you blame for not imposing restrictions on the GSE's between 2002 and 2006 which might have averted the financial meltdown -- the Republican majority party in Congress or the Democrat minority party?
Reagan as it was his economic policy that passed. When Tip ONeil said the economic policy of Reagan was DOA, Reagan went to the people on TV and sold it. The pressure was put on the Congress to pass the agenda. If you were old enough and around during that period you would have known that, instead you read leftwing bs and buy it as fact.
In the 90's it was the GOP Congress that was elected after the Clinton tax increase and it was the GOP Congress through the Contract with America that led to the economic results we had. Clinton was smart enough to sign the legislation including the repeal of his tax increases in 1997.
The results are there for all to see but you refuse to consider you just could be wrong. I lived and worked during both periods of time, how old were you?
Well I certainly hope you can back that with a quote of mine before you put me back on ignore.Looks like you are the one that cannot tell the truth...
A wise choice -- always best to be gracious.
No, I never said they are to be ignored, I said that Conservatives and Republicans are hypocrites for whining about Obama when their own selections for president can't even carry Obama's jock strap.
Sadly for you, you won't be around to see it.
Still waiting for an answer ... you said that, "Obama has a been a disaster economically"
Still waiting for an answer ... you said that, "Obama has a been a disaster economically"
The Dow is up 51% since Obama became president; NASDAQ is up 85%; S&P500 is up 57% ...
Does your superior intellect inform you that people invest that heavily in the stock market amid "economic disaster?"
A whimsical fancy of which Conservatives cling to. It's no more accurate than their faith based economic fancies that tax cuts increase tax revenue.what did Churchill say-if you aren't a conservative at age 30 you do not have a brain?
A whimsical fancy of which Conservatives cling to. It's no more accurate than their faith based economic fancies that tax cuts increase tax revenue.
Poor haymarket. you have spent so many years sucking on the public teat you project your situation to everyone else
Its called PROJECTION
when (and if) you get to thirty let me know. tax cuts increased my net income. that's good enough a reason to support them especially since I pay more in federal income taxes than 50 million or more people who have the same citizenship rights as I do
what is the true unemployment rate?
what did S&P do last week
what is the current trade deficit
how is the dollar faring?
Poor Turtle - your have spent so many years suckling from the rich you now hate everyone who is not.
Its called ELITISM.
Still have not found out how to use the search function I see.
and yet again for time beyond calculation you lay attempt to lay the ideological groundwork for the stripping scores of millions of Americans of the Constitutional rights.
All in the pursuit of Mammon and radical Republicanism.
A wise choice -- always best to be gracious.
No, I never said they are to be ignored, I said that Conservatives and Republicans are hypocrites for whining about Obama when their own selections for president can't even carry Obama's jock strap.
Sadly for you, you won't be around to see it.
Too funny!!!
I point out that you're the one in this forum who selectively decides who gets credit or blame based on political party and how do you respond ... ?
... by selectively deciding who gets credit or blame based on political party. Thanks for proving me right, Conservative! You did a better job at that than I did.
I really like how you think in the 80's, the president was responsible for a strong economy but in the 90's, it was the Congress which was responsible for a strong economy. What changed between the 80's and the 90's ... ?
Oh yes, political parties.
Thanks again for making my point for me! :2wave:
You're thoroughly confused as usual. I wasn't seeking to understand how this forum works; I'm well aware of that -- I was seeking to understand how you work.That is the way it works, unfortunately others that I value respond to you and thus your post is there so when I read their posts I have to read what they are responding to. I understand your lack of understanding of how this works but surely thought you were smarter when it came to the use of a computer especially since you are so young.
still cannot understand the socratic method
So let's establish some credibility here, how old were you when Reagan was President?
greed is your game-Look at your quote
we have to steal from others for "the greater good"
his age has nothing to do with credibility, you seek to use to discredit the argument he has make against you....age has nothing to do with this debate.So let's establish some credibility here, how old were you when Reagan was President?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?