• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why did insurance companies pull out of California right before the wild fires?

I did. But instead of quoting me and showing where I did not articulate the point you just whine... was that what your degree was in?

Please... do no debate. Do not quote. Do not show what a person actually said... just whine. Please. Whine away. Have fun! 🌻 😂🌻
Bodi? You do realize you are the one whining about me not understanding your “ point”
Right?
Lmao
 
Bodi? You do realize you are the one whining about me not understanding your “ point”
Right?
Lmao
Yep, but it is more like you don't agree with my point but you refuse to say why or to show what I have said that is wrong... with quotes.


Just the same ol' same ol' really... LOL
 
The millions of people that have claims denied...

A KFF survey of adults with health insurance found that roughly 6 in 10 insured adults experience problems when they use their insurance. Problems studied include denied claims, network adequacy issues, preauthorization delays and denials, and others.
The thread is about PROPERTY insurance and not health insurance. But is the solution on health insurance is to just pay every claim without audit or question then? I can't make heads or tails of the link as it talks about denied claims and doesn't say what those claims were or if the denials were justified. There are appeals processes as well and the link makes no mention of that. By way of example, let's say someone insures with Farmers and has a house and car insured with them and his wife dies. He asks Farmers for $100,000.00 and the claim is denied because he didn't buy life insurance.
 
Yep, but it is more like you don't agree with my point but you refuse to say why or to show what I have said that is wrong... with quotes.


Just the same ol' same ol' really... LOL
No. I don’t think anyone but you understands what “ point” you were trying to make.

I don’t think you even understand your point since you haven’t even bothered to try to articulate it in another way or clarify it.

Same old same old from you.
 
No. I don’t think anyone but you understands what “ point” you were trying to make.

I don’t think you even understand your point since you haven’t even bothered to try to articulate it in another way or clarify it.

Same old same old from you.

I still don't know what you don't understand because you refuse to tell me what you don't understand. Highest degree! LOL
 
I still don't know what you don't understand because you refuse to tell me what you don't understand. Highest degree! LOL
You are the one that said I missed your point.
So obviously you don’t think I understand.
So it’s up to you to explain how I missed your point.
 
If the insurance companies knew that the risk was so high, the State also knew. The State did nothing to fix it.
 
60 Minutes ran a piece on 3/30/25 on the post fire destruction in California highlighting the toxic conditions from asbestos insulation in older homes and buildings, lead fumes from burnt pipes and lead based paint, electric batteries in electric cars, etc.
 
If the insurance companies knew that the risk was so high, the State also knew. The State did nothing to fix it.
The state doesn’t and can’t control the weather
 

Why did insurance companies pull out of California right before the wild fires?​

Simply because Insurance companies are not stupid. They are in the business to make a profit insuring risk. The lower the risk the more chance for profit. The higher the risk the more chance for loss.

Those companies were well-aware of both California's crazy water use (read waste) policies, as well as the high risk of annual fires in spring and summer. Especially when the State and local governments were not properly clearing dried brush and fallen timber in order to help prevent such fires. Add to that the improper maintenance of reservoirs, and it was a disaster waiting to happen.
If only they’d raked, like trump suggested.
 
The silly thing is, that you don't know that my post had nothing to do with the weather.
Then you don’t know anything about wild fires, specifically this wild fire in CA 😂
 
Of course you know he lied.

Nobody cares about what you believe. Or the lies you tell.
Who lied?

If you didn't care, you would not respond.
 
@aocisonedumbho lied.

Because you tagged me. Don’t jump into conversations you aren’t equipped to handle. You end up looking silly. Like in this thread.
You care. You responded.
If you didn't care, you'd ignore or use the ignore function.

But, you care. You know I am correct.
 
To point out the stupidity of your post.

I don’t ignore posters. Only ******s use the ignore feature.

I enjoy pointing out out stupidity. So when you post stupidity, and I see it, I will call you on it.
The only stupidity is a post that claims to not care and never stop responding. Like you do.
The definition of stupidity, is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Just stop doing that.

If you enjoy pointing out stupidity, you should read your posts and respond.
 
The only stupidity is a post that claims to not care and never stop responding. Like you do.
I’m pointing out the stupidity of your post. I will continue doing so until you cease posting stupidity.
The definition of stupidity, is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Just stop
That’s not the definition 😂
If you enjoy pointing out stupidity, you should read your posts and respond.
Why? My posts are dedicated to pointing out the stupidity you post. I’m happy to actually debate you, but that would require you posting something intelligent.
 
I’m pointing out the stupidity of your post. I will continue doing so until you cease posting stupidity.

That’s not the definition 😂

Why? My posts are dedicated to pointing out the stupidity you post. I’m happy to actually debate you, but that would require you posting something intelligent.
It is the definition. For the insane.
 
Back
Top Bottom